Little Berlin / LensBaby + tilt-shift from Giovanni Antico on Vimeo.
This time lapse presents Berlin in a stunning and very cute way!You will definitely enjoy watching this
Little Berlin / LensBaby + tilt-shift from Giovanni Antico on Vimeo.
This time lapse presents Berlin in a stunning and very cute way!You will definitely enjoy watching this
Evolution (Burning Man time lapses) from Delrious on Vimeo.
Time lapses at Burning Man 2009.Music by Roy Two Thousand.
What if the future of artificial intelligence was already mapped out—month by month, twist by twist, like a Netflix series you can’t stop binging but also can’t stop fearing?
That’s what AI-2027.com offers: a meticulously crafted timeline by Scott Alexander and Daniel Kokotajlo that projects us forward into the near-future of AI development. Spoiler: It’s not science fiction. It’s disturbingly plausible. And that’s the point.
But this isn’t just a speculative sci-fi romp for AI nerds. It’s a psychological litmus test for our collective imagination—and our collective denial.
The Future Has a Calendar Now
The site lays out an eerily realistic month-by-month narrative of AI progress from 2023 through 2027. The breakthroughs. The existential questions. The human reactions—from awe to panic to collapse.
It feels like a prophetic script, written not in the stars, but in Silicon Valley boardrooms.
But here’s the uncomfortable twist: The most shocking thing about this speculative future is how… reasonable it sounds.
We’re not talking about Terminators or utopias. We’re talking about:
Is This a Forecast—Or a Mirror?
What makes AI-2027 so fascinating—and so chilling—isn’t just its content. It’s the format: a timeline. That subtle design choice signals something terrifying. It doesn’t ask “if” this will happen. It assumes it. You’re not reading possibilities; you’re reading inevitabilities.
That’s how we talk about weather. Or war.
The real message isn’t that the timeline will come true. It’s that we’re already living as though it will.
The Comfort of Fatalism
There’s a strange comfort in deterministic timelines. If AI will do X in June 2026 and Y in October 2027, then we’re just passengers on the ride, right? There’s no need to ask messy questions like:
The AI-2027 narrative doesn’t answer those questions. It forces you to.
Luxury Beliefs in the Age of AGI
This timeline exists in the same cultural moment where billionaires spend fortunes on yacht-shaped NFTs while workers are told to “reskill” for jobs that don’t yet exist and may never come. We’re living in a dystopia disguised as a tech demo.
In this context, AI isn’t a tool—it’s a mirror held up to power. It reflects a world that prioritizes acceleration over reflection, data over wisdom, and product releases over public good.
So What Now?
If AI-2027 is right, then the time to think critically about what we’re building—and who we’re becoming—is now. Not in 2026 when the genie’s out. Not in 2027 when the market’s crashed and ethics panels are writing blog posts in past tense.
This timeline isn’t a prophecy. It’s a provocation.
The future is being imagined for us. The question is: do we accept the script?
Or do we write our own?
By the time you finish reading this, a TikTok from a Chinese factory worker will have reached more people than a Hermès campaign ever will—and done more damage than any critic ever could.
Welcome to the collapse of the luxury illusion.
Across Chinese TikTok (Douyin), manufacturers are lifting the curtain on fashion’s most guarded secret: what luxury goods actually cost to make. The numbers aren’t just embarrassing—they’re revolutionary.
No glossy editorials. No influencers. Just raw footage, pricing receipts, and factory walk-throughs. And people are watching—millions of them.
This isn’t a trend. It’s a reckoning.
Luxury was never about the object.
It’s about what the object says about you.
A logo is a social passport. A flex. A shield against invisibility. We don’t buy luxury for the leather—we buy it for the lie: that owning it means we’ve arrived.
But what happens when the people who make these items show up on your feed saying,
“This costs $6 to make. Here’s the link if you want it without the markup”?
What happens is chaos.
Because luxury depends on distance. Mystique. A carefully orchestrated silence between the sweatshop and the storefront. These TikToks smash that silence like a hammer through glass.
French theorist Jean Baudrillard warned us: when reality becomes too ugly, society turns to symbols. We stop consuming things—we consume the idea of them.
That’s luxury: the hyperreality of status.
A Hermès bag isn’t a bag. It’s a narrative: wealth, taste, power.
But when the factory shows the exact same bag being made for pennies, the narrative falls apart.
And we’re left staring at a sobering truth:
You’ve been paying for permission to feel worthy.
This wave of viral transparency isn’t just financial—it’s philosophical.
It doesn’t just question what luxury costs.
It questions what luxury is.
Suddenly, luxury becomes indistinguishable from fast fashion—except with better PR.
This new generation isn’t just style-savvy. They’re system-savvy.
They’re not asking, “Where can I buy this?”
They’re asking, “Who made this, how much were they paid, and why am I being manipulated?”
And that’s what terrifies the luxury world:
Not knockoffs, but informed consumers.
Because when status is no longer about price but principle, the entire luxury model—built on secrecy, seduction, and shame—starts to collapse.
If luxury is no longer a price tag, maybe it’s time we redefine it.
Maybe the new luxury is:
Luxury isn’t dead. But its costume is rotting.
And the people who made your favorite “It” bag?
They just set the costume on fire—and filmed it in 4K.
Let’s not sugarcoat it.
The world’s being run by people who shouldn’t be trusted with a toaster, let alone a government. And we’re all living in the group project of history where the dumbest kid somehow became team leader — again.
But how did we get here? And more importantly, what happens when the fools take the wheel and rip out the brakes?
Welcome to the Idiotocracy
Facts? Optional.
Science? “Just a theory.”
Experts? Elitists.
Now your cousin who failed high school biology is giving TED Talks on TikTok about vaccines, geopolitics, and how the moon landing was a hoax.
In the Idiotocracy, reality is whatever gets the most engagement. Truth doesn’t matter — only vibes do.
They don’t lead — they perform.
Every crisis is a photo op. Every speech is a soundbite. Every decision is run through a PR filter and covered in hashtags.
Actual policy? Boring.
Much easier to wrap incompetence in nationalism and stage-manage it like a halftime show — minus the talent.
Why fix a system when you can gut it and sell the parts?
They don’t understand how government, justice, education, or healthcare work — and more importantly, they don’t care. Bureaucracy becomes a playground. Law turns into suggestion. Checks and balances? Rebranded as “red tape.”
We built systems to protect ourselves from tyranny. They’re now held together by duct tape and denial.
Global warming? Ban plastic straws.
Inequality? Tell people to hustle harder.
Education crisis? Fire the teachers and start a podcast.
They slap Band-Aids on bullet wounds, then pat themselves on the back for being “solution-oriented.” Oversimplification isn’t a bug — it’s the entire operating system.
Can’t fix it? Blame someone.
Immigrants. Minorities. Journalists. Scientists. The Illuminati. Take your pick.
When your toolbox is empty, you reach for torches and pitchforks. Fear is easier to sell than facts — and division is the only real skill they have.
The smart people leave. Or worse, they stay and get quiet.
You can’t out-shout stupid. So the scientists step down, the journalists ( the ones that actually do their work )burn out, and the innovators go build crypto startups in bunkers. What’s left? A leadership echo chamber filled with an army of loyal idiots who are as clueless as they are confident.
It’s not just brain drain — it’s a brain evacuation.
We’ve seen this movie before — authoritarianism, economic collapse, mass disinformation. But to learn from history, you have to read it.
And these people don’t read.
So they charge headfirst into disasters we’ve already mapped. Same flames. New hashtags.
You don’t beat idiocy with politeness.
You beat it with clarity. With resistance. With truth spoken louder than the noise.
You speak. You think. You demand better — not perfect, just better than the circus we’ve built around the bonfire of common sense.
Because when idiots rule the world, the only hope left… is that the rest of us remember what smart used to look like — and fight like hell to bring it back
The world feels like it’s spinning out of control. Wars are spreading, economies are shaking, alliances are breaking, and old rules no longer seem to apply. It’s not just one crisis—it’s many, all hitting at once. The way global power works is changing, and 2025 may be the year we look back on as the moment everything shifted.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has sent shockwaves around the world. His “America First” approach means pulling back from global commitments, no matter the cost. He’s stopped military aid to Ukraine, put new tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada, and questioned NATO’s role.
For decades, the U.S. acted as the world’s stabilizer, keeping alliances strong and conflicts in check. Now, with Trump stepping back, a power vacuum is forming—and countries like Russia and China are ready to take advantage. The big question is: will Europe step up, or is this the beginning of a new world order where force, not diplomacy, decides the future?
With the U.S. retreating, Russia and China are getting bolder.
This is beginning to look like a new Cold War, but with even higher stakes. If Russia expands further and China moves on Taiwan, the balance of world power could change completely.
Trump’s new tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada have rattled global markets. Europe is bracing for impact, fearing it will be next. Meanwhile, energy supplies are once again in question—if Russia tightens its grip on Ukraine, could it use energy as a weapon against Europe?
With inflation still a concern and economies still recovering from past crises, another global recession could be looming. Nations that were just starting to bounce back now face a new wave of uncertainty.
In the past, crises like these would lead to emergency global meetings, with world leaders working together to prevent disaster. But in 2025, that’s not happening. Instead:
Without coordination, tensions will only rise. The world isn’t just unstable—it’s unpredictable.
The world is at a crossroads. The way things have worked since World War II—through diplomacy, alliances, and global cooperation—is breaking down. What replaces it? No one knows yet, but the possibilities are dramatic:
2025 isn’t just another year—it’s a turning point. Historians will look back at this moment as the time when the world changed. The question is: how much will change—and who will come out on top?
“If something is broken for long enough, people stop noticing the cracks. And if you keep people entertained, distracted, or exhausted, they won’t ask why things never change.”
Look around.
The climate is collapsing. Billionaires hoard obscene amounts of wealth while workers scrape by. Governments lie, corporations exploit, media distorts—and yet, where is the outrage?
Sure, people complain. They post their frustrations online. Maybe they march for a weekend. But then? They move on.
And that’s not an accident.
The greatest trick those in power ever pulled wasn’t oppression—it was making people comfortable with oppression.
They don’t need to silence you if they can distract you. They don’t need to fight you if they can exhaust you. They don’t need to defeat you if they can make you fight each other instead.
This is the science of apathy. And it’s being engineered all around us.
There was a time when public outrage could shut down a government, when mass protests could paralyze an economy. Now? People are too busy scrolling.
Tech monopolies and media conglomerates have turned distraction into an industry. The more time you spend plugged in, the less time you spend paying attention.
Power doesn’t fear an informed, organized public. It fears a public that notices the system is rigged—and does something about it.
If distraction doesn’t work, the next best weapon is exhaustion.
Every day, we’re bombarded with so much bad news that it becomes impossible to care about all of it.
The more crises they throw at you, the more powerless you feel. And when people feel powerless, they stop trying.
Ever notice how news cycles burn through tragedies in days? One week, everyone is outraged. The next, they’ve moved on. Not because the problem was fixed—but because another crisis took its place.
Power structures don’t need to hide their corruption if they can just bury it under so much noise that no one can keep up.
There’s one thing that has always scared the ruling class: people uniting against them.
So what’s the best way to prevent that? Turn people against each other instead.
The game is simple: If the working class ever realized their real enemy isn’t each other, they could flip the system overnight.
That’s why mainstream media stokes outrage over culture wars but never class wars. They’ll tell you to hate your neighbor over who they vote for—but never to question why the ultra-rich own everything while you fight for scraps.
Even if you see through the distractions, even if you resist exhaustion, there’s still one thing stopping you from taking action: survival.
A truly free society wouldn’t have its citizens living paycheck to paycheck.
A society where people aren’t constantly on the edge of financial collapse is one where they might have time to think, organize, and resist.
But those in power don’t want that. They want you just comfortable enough to keep going, but too scared to take risks.
That’s not a free society. That’s economic servitude.
The system survives only if we accept its rules. The moment enough people decide they’re done, everything shifts.
If you feel numb, tired, or overwhelmed—it’s not your fault.
That’s exactly how the system wants you to feel.
But the truth is, apathy is a choice that benefits only those in power.
Because once people decide to reject distraction, resist exhaustion, refuse division, and challenge the compliance economy—change is no longer impossible.
It’s inevitable.
They are counting on you to stay silent.
So don’t.