Info

Search results for star wars

The vow that was supposed to save humanity has collapsed into a slogan. In Gaza, “Never Again” is happening again, while the world watches and whispers excuses.

The Hollow Ritual of Memory

Every January, the world lowers its head. Leaders line up at Holocaust memorials, candles flicker, violins weep. “Never Again,” they whisper, as if repeating the words will keep the past at bay. We congratulate ourselves for remembering. But remembrance without courage is theatre. And theatre does not stop the bombs falling on Gaza.

For the children buried in the rubble, the words “Never Again” ring like a cruel joke. Never Again? It is happening again—different accents, different uniforms, but the same dehumanization, the same silence, the same graves filled with children who should have lived.

The Machinery of Dehumanization

The Holocaust did not begin with gas chambers. It began with words. Rats. Vermin. Parasites. The steady erosion of dignity until killing became a bureaucratic task.

Today, Gaza is described in almost identical terms. Its people reduced to “human animals,” its children cast as shadows rather than lives. Once language strips away humanity, mass death becomes “collateral damage.” Bulldozers flatten homes as if clearing debris. Starving families are labeled “security risks.” A whole population turned into statistics, denied the simple recognition of being human.

The machinery changes its tools, but the blueprint remains the same.

The Complicity of the World

Here is the obscenity: the very nations that stand solemnly at Auschwitz every January are the ones arming the bombardment of Gaza. American presidents, European prime ministers, they mouth “Never Again” with one hand on their chest while the other hand signs arms deals.

The hypocrisy is unbearable. A leader who weeps at a Holocaust memorial in the morning will justify the bombing of schools in the afternoon. Newspapers that publish endless anniversary spreads on the Shoah relegate Gaza’s dead children to a back-page statistic.

The world, once again, is silent. Silence that is not neutral, silence that is consent. Silence that kills twice—once by omission, once by complicity.

The Weaponization of Memory

“Never Again” was meant to be humanity’s oath. But memory has been narrowed, twisted, turned into a national brand rather than a universal principle. The Holocaust’s memory, instead of serving as a warning for all peoples, is used as political currency.

This betrayal is worse than denial. To deny the Holocaust is to erase the past. To weaponize its memory is to poison the present. It means “Never Again” does not apply to everyone—only to some. It becomes conditional. Selective. Hollow.

And what is a broken oath if not another crime?

The Children as Witnesses

Walk through Auschwitz today and you will see small shoes piled behind glass. In Gaza, those shoes are still on children’s feet when the bombs tear them apart. Both sets of children cry out through time: What is the point of memory if it cannot protect us?

History’s testimony is not abstract—it is flesh, bones, laughter cut short. A six-year-old who drew butterflies in the Warsaw Ghetto. A six-year-old in Gaza who just wanted bread. Both silenced by walls, by starvation, by human cruelty justified as necessity.

They are each other’s witnesses, across time and rubble.

The Oath That Became a Lie

The world swore “Never Again” and then built museums, carved speeches, erected statues. But monuments without conscience are empty stones. Words without courage are lies.

Every child buried in Gaza makes those words hollower. Every silence from the West makes them more obscene. “Never Again” was not supposed to be a marketing slogan. It was supposed to be humanity’s line in the sand. In Gaza, that line is not only crossed—it is erased.

If “Never Again” does not mean never again for them, then it never meant anything at all.

“Never Again” was humanity’s promise. Gaza proves it was only humanity’s excuse.

In the past week, the headlines have been relentless. Nineteen Russian drones breach Polish airspace. Israel bombs Gaza and Yemen in one sweep. NATO talks about invoking Article 4 for the first time in years. Two cargo ships sink in the Red Sea. Taiwan holds its largest military drill in history. Putin and Kim join Xi in show of strength as China unveils new weapons at huge military parade

At the same time, governments fall. Nepal’s prime minister resigns after anti-corruption protests. France’s Bayrou government collapses in a confidence vote. Indonesia reshuffles its cabinet and markets nosedive. In Kenya and Serbia, the streets erupt. In Utah, an American political activist is shot dead on stage.

It would be easy to treat these as separate stories. Different continents, different crises. But together they tell a larger truth: the global political order is bleeding legitimacy faster than it can patch itself up.

The Era of Illusion Is Over

For decades, leaders managed to buy time. They could distract with new slogans, reshuffled cabinets, emergency meetings, endless promises that reform was just around the corner. Those tricks no longer work. From Kathmandu to Paris, from Belgrade to Nairobi, the crowd has stopped believing.

What remains is exposure. Leaders who once cloaked themselves in the language of competence now look like what they are: administrators of decline. They rename the US Department of Defense the “Department of War” as if language can mask failure. They build alliances, break alliances, start wars, all while housing costs soar and wages stagnate.

The mask is gone. The anger is raw.

When Leaders Collapse, Streets Take Over

Charlie Kirk’s assassination in Utah shocked America not only because of the act itself, but because it revealed something darker: politics is no longer theatre. Rhetoric now bleeds into violence. The same mistrust that drives Nepali youth to topple a prime minister fuels armed rage in the United States.

In Serbia, protesters risk bullets to shout down corruption. In Kenya, crowds flood the streets, refusing to be silenced by tear gas. Each eruption may look local, but together they form a global bonfire.

People have had it. They are tired of elites who hoard wealth, trade influence, and pretend to govern while reality disintegrates. They no longer trust the ballot box to deliver justice. So they march. They burn. They occupy. They imagine power without politicians.

The Real Crisis

The gravest crisis today is not Russian drones over Poland or missiles in Gaza. It is not even the collapse of one government after another. The real crisis is legitimacy. The belief that leaders are capable of governing in the public interest has snapped.

Without legitimacy, armies are just men with weapons. Parliaments are just rooms with microphones. The entire edifice of modern politics—states, treaties, elections—rests on a fragile foundation of consent. That consent is eroding everywhere at once.

What Comes Next

When leaders collapse, crowds do not go home. They take up space. They organize. They experiment. What begins as rage can grow into something else: a refusal to return to normal. The old world of managed decline is cracking. What replaces it is still unknown, but it will not be built by the politicians who failed us.

That is the real lesson of this week. From NATO’s panic to Nepal’s fall, from the streets of Nairobi to the assassination in Utah, the story is not about isolated events. It is about the collapse of patience on a planetary scale.

The world has stopped waiting for leaders to lead.

The world feels like it’s spinning out of control. Wars are spreading, economies are shaking, alliances are breaking, and old rules no longer seem to apply. It’s not just one crisis—it’s many, all hitting at once. The way global power works is changing, and 2025 may be the year we look back on as the moment everything shifted.

The U.S. Pullback: Trump Reshapes Global Politics

Donald Trump’s return to the White House has sent shockwaves around the world. His “America First” approach means pulling back from global commitments, no matter the cost. He’s stopped military aid to Ukraine, put new tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada, and questioned NATO’s role.

For decades, the U.S. acted as the world’s stabilizer, keeping alliances strong and conflicts in check. Now, with Trump stepping back, a power vacuum is forming—and countries like Russia and China are ready to take advantage. The big question is: will Europe step up, or is this the beginning of a new world order where force, not diplomacy, decides the future?

The Rise of Authoritarian Powers: Russia and China on the Move

With the U.S. retreating, Russia and China are getting bolder.

  • Russia sees an opening in Ukraine—if America won’t back Europe, what’s stopping Putin from pushing further?
  • China is watching closely—if the U.S. won’t stand up to Russia, will it also step back from Taiwan?

This is beginning to look like a new Cold War, but with even higher stakes. If Russia expands further and China moves on Taiwan, the balance of world power could change completely.

Economic Shockwaves: The New Trade War

Trump’s new tariffs on China, Mexico, and Canada have rattled global markets. Europe is bracing for impact, fearing it will be next. Meanwhile, energy supplies are once again in question—if Russia tightens its grip on Ukraine, could it use energy as a weapon against Europe?

With inflation still a concern and economies still recovering from past crises, another global recession could be looming. Nations that were just starting to bounce back now face a new wave of uncertainty.

Diplomacy is Failing: Every Country for Itself

In the past, crises like these would lead to emergency global meetings, with world leaders working together to prevent disaster. But in 2025, that’s not happening. Instead:

  • The U.S. is acting alone, making moves without consulting allies.
  • Europe is trying to hold things together, but without U.S. backing, it’s struggling.
  • Russia and China are forming their own alliances, creating a power shift away from the West.
  • The UN, NATO, and WTO are losing influence—countries are ignoring global institutions in favor of their own interests.

Without coordination, tensions will only rise. The world isn’t just unstable—it’s unpredictable.

What Happens Next?

The world is at a crossroads. The way things have worked since World War II—through diplomacy, alliances, and global cooperation—is breaking down. What replaces it? No one knows yet, but the possibilities are dramatic:

  • Will Europe step up and defend Ukraine alone? Or will it fold under the pressure?
  • Will China take this as its chance to invade Taiwan?
  • Is Trump’s America in long-term decline, or is this just another shift in global power?
  • If Russia keeps pushing, will NATO hold together—or collapse?
  • Could trade wars and economic chaos trigger another financial crisis?

2025 isn’t just another year—it’s a turning point. Historians will look back at this moment as the time when the world changed. The question is: how much will change—and who will come out on top?

Imagine a house on fire. The flames are spreading, the walls are crumbling—but instead of putting it out, the people in charge start debating who gets credit for calling 911. That’s what politics looks like in 2025.

Everywhere you look, the world is full of problems that didn’t have to be this bad. The climate crisis, wealth inequality, geopolitical instability—none of these issues appeared overnight. They were neglected, ignored, or deliberately postponed in favor of election-cycle politics.

  • Governments kick climate deadlines decades down the road.
  • Corporate lobbyists stall regulations that could prevent another financial collapse.
  • Leaders play political games instead of solving skyrocketing housing and healthcare costs.

And when people ask why, the answer is always the same: “We’ll get to it later.”

Well, later is here. And we are paying the price for a system that only looks four years ahead when the problems we face demand generational thinking.

How Short-Term Politics Is Destroying the Future

If 2025 has made one thing clear, it’s that short-term politics isn’t just frustrating—it’s actively dangerous.

The Climate Crisis Is No Longer a Future Problem

  • Wildfires, heatwaves, and floods aren’t warnings anymore—they’re happening right now.
  • Carbon reduction targets keep getting pushed back, as if nature cares about our deadlines.
  • Fossil fuel companies are still raking in record profits while leaders make empty pledges.

The Economy Works for the Few, Not the Many

  • The wealth gap in 2025 is the highest it has been in modern history.
  • Corporate tax breaks flow freely, but workers still fight for basic wages.
  • Governments spend billions bailing out industries but can’t find the funds for universal healthcare.
  • The majority of people can not afford food or housing

Democracy Is on Life Support

  • People trust politicians less than ever, and can you blame them?
  • Election cycles reward cheap promises over real solutions.
  • Authoritarianism is creeping back into mainstream politics, fueled by public exhaustion and disillusionment.
  • Wars and conflicts almost everywhere around the planet

All of this was preventable. All of this was avoidable. But instead of tackling problems head-on, politicians keep playing for votes while the world burns—sometimes literally.

Why Politicians Only Think in Four-Year Cycles

The reason we’re stuck in this mess is simple: long-term solutions don’t win elections.

  • Voters want results now, not in 20 years.
  • Political parties cater to what’s popular today, not what’s necessary tomorrow.
  • The media thrives on crisis after crisis, not boring policy discussions about sustainability.

So, what do politicians do?

They focus on:
✅ Short-term tax cuts to boost approval ratings.
✅ Infrastructure projects that look good rather than last long.
✅ Deflecting responsibility onto the next administration.

And let’s be honest—we let them do it.

We reward politicians for temporary relief over lasting change. We fall for the same soundbites every election season. We complain, we rage, but we rarely demand accountability that stretches beyond an election cycle.

This Has Happened Before—And It Never Ends Well

History has a way of repeating itself. The worst disasters of the past weren’t just caused by bad decisions—they were caused by leaders who refused to act when it mattered most.

  • The 2008 financial crisis—Experts warned about reckless banking practices for years before the economy collapsed. No one listened.
  • The rise of authoritarian regimes in the 20th century—Politicians underestimated radical movements until it was too late.
  • The pandemic response—Governments ignored the warning signs, then scrambled in panic mode while millions suffered.

Every time, we look back and ask: How did they not see it coming?

But right now, in 2025, we do see it coming. We see crises forming everywhere, and still, leaders are making the same mistakes—playing political chess while the world teeters on the edge.

Breaking the Cycle: What Happens Next Is Up to Us

If politicians won’t think beyond the next election, we have to force them to.

What Can We Do?

1️⃣ Call Out the Short-Term Lies

  • If a politician pushes a policy that sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
  • Stop falling for quick fixes that kick problems further down the road.

2️⃣ Stop Rewarding Leaders Who Only Think in Poll Numbers

  • If a leader only talks about the next four years and not the next 40, they aren’t a leader.
  • Demand long-term policy commitments and hold them to it.

3️⃣ Reimagine What Leadership Looks Like

  • Real leaders take unpopular stances because they care about the future, not just their career.
  • If a politician is too afraid to lose an election to do the right thing, they shouldn’t be in power to begin with.

4️⃣ Invest in Political Education

  • The more people understand why these problems exist, the harder they are to manipulate.
  • Demand accountability, not empty promises.

The Future Is Being Decided Right Now

If we keep rewarding short-term thinking, the future will always be someone else’s problem.

But the truth is, we are the generation paying the price for the short-term politics of the past.

The only question is: Will we keep making the same mistake?

Because if we don’t demand better now, the next generation won’t even have the luxury of asking.

“If a single child is trapped under rubble, the world stops. If thousands suffer, we call it a crisis—but we move on. Why?”

We don’t like to admit it, but our empathy has limits. We care deeply about our families, our friends, our communities. But beyond that? Beyond our immediate circles, our borders, our cultures?

Something shifts.

A war breaks out in a distant country. A factory collapse kills hundreds. Refugees flee devastation.

And we scroll past.

Not because we’re bad people. Not because we don’t care. But because something inside us—something ancient, something wired into our survival—tells us: That’s not your problem.

This isn’t just about apathy. It’s about how human nature, technology, and politics work together to turn real people into statistics. And if we don’t challenge it, the consequences are dire.

How Our Brains Trick Us Into Indifference

Science has a name for this: psychic numbing—the way our emotions shut down when faced with large-scale suffering.

  • We feel deeply for one person in pain.
  • We struggle to process the suffering of millions.

Paul Slovic, a researcher on human behavior, calls this the collapse of compassion. The larger the tragedy, the harder it is for our brains to compute.

And it’s not just numbers. It’s distance—physical, cultural, emotional.

  • A friend loses their job? We rally to help.
  • Thousands lose their homes in a country we’ve never visited? We feel bad. But it’s… abstract.

The further someone is from our world, the harder it is to see them as fully human.

This isn’t an excuse. It’s a warning. Because history shows us what happens when we let this instinct go unchallenged.

From Indifference to Dehumanization

We like to believe that atrocities belong to the past. That genocide, war crimes, exploitation—those were the failures of another time.

But here’s the truth: Every mass injustice started with dehumanization.

  • The Holocaust didn’t begin with concentration camps. It began with people being called “vermin.”
  • Slavery didn’t start with chains. It started with the idea that some people were less than others.
  • Refugees drowning in the sea today? We call them a “crisis.” A “wave.” A problem to manage, not people to help.

The moment we stop seeing people as individuals with hopes, fears, and dreams—that’s when anything becomes possible.

And make no mistake: Dehumanization isn’t just something that happens “over there.” It’s happening now. In the way we talk about migrants. Protesters. The poor. The enemy.

This isn’t just about the past. This is about us. Right now.

The Media’s Role: Who Gets to Be a Victim?

Have you ever noticed how some tragedies make headlines for weeks—while others disappear in hours?

It’s not random.

  • A war breaks out in a wealthy country? Wall-to-wall coverage.
  • A famine kills thousands in a nation already struggling? Maybe a news brief—if that.

Why? Because we prioritize the suffering of people who look like us, live like us, think like us.

The media doesn’t create bias. It reflects it. It feeds us the stories we’re most likely to engage with—the ones that feel closest to home.

And what happens to the rest? The wars, the famines, the crises that don’t fit a convenient narrative? They fade into the background.

The world keeps turning. And people keep suffering, unseen.

How We Break the Cycle

If human nature, history, and media all push us toward selective empathy—what do we do about it?

1. Make It Personal

Statistics don’t move people. Stories do.

  • One refugee’s journey is more powerful than a thousand faceless numbers.
  • One family struggling through war is more moving than a death toll.

If you want to care more, seek out the human stories. Don’t let crises become headlines without faces.

2. Notice Who You’re Not Seeing

Next time you’re scrolling, ask yourself:

  • Whose suffering is being ignored?
  • Who is missing from the conversation?
  • Whose pain are we comfortable looking away from?

Challenge the instinct to only empathize with people who remind you of yourself.

3. Stop Using Language That Distances

The moment we call people “migrants” instead of families fleeing for their lives, we detach.
The moment we call people “rioters” instead of citizens demanding justice, we lose the story.

Words matter. They shape how we see the world—and who we decide is worth saving.

4. Take Responsibility for Your Attention

We can’t control global suffering. But we can control what we engage with.

  • Follow journalists who cover forgotten stories.
  • Share voices that aren’t being heard.
  • Stay present with crises that are easy to ignore.

Empathy is a muscle. Use it.

There is a reason history repeats itself: The Cost of Looking Away

Every injustice—every war, every genocide, every mass suffering—began with the same excuse:

“That’s not our problem.”

And if we let that thinking take over, if we let ourselves become numb—then we will watch the next crisis unfold in real time, feel bad for a moment, and move on.

But we don’t have to.

We can fight to see people as they are. To challenge the forces that divide us. To break the cycle before it’s too late.

Because the greatest threat to humanity has never been war, or disease, or disaster.

It’s indifference.

And the choice before us everyday is simple: Will we care, or will we look away?

What if the U.S. government isn’t protecting you from China—but protecting itself from the truth?

For decades, the U.S. media and government have fed the public a carefully curated narrative: China is the enemy. From tech bans to trade wars, the message is clear—China is a dangerous force that must be contained.

But now, something unexpected is happening.

Americans are downloading RedNote (Xiaohongshu), and they’re starting to realize that everything they’ve been told might not be true.

The Shift: From Fear to Curiosity

For years, the only stories about China that reached Western audiences were filtered through legacy media outlets, government briefings, and Big Tech algorithms. The country was portrayed as an authoritarian surveillance state, an economic predator, and a threat to global stability.

But once TikTok users started migrating to RedNote, they encountered something they weren’t supposed to see: real, unfiltered glimpses of life in China. Not state propaganda, not Hollywood’s dystopian version—just everyday people sharing their lives, culture, and ideas. And it didn’t match the fear-mongering narratives they had been fed. They now know that Chinese people can afford more food from them, they are being educated better, they drive better cars and they have free health!

Portrait

The U.S. Media’s Propaganda Machine is Cracking

Think about it:

  • If China is truly the dystopian nightmare we’ve been told, why do millions of Americans find RedNote so engaging and relatable?
  • If Chinese social media apps are just government-run brainwashing tools, why does RedNote feature content critical of its own government and explore ideas that contradict the official narrative?
  • Why did the U.S. establishment freak out the moment Americans started exploring an alternative not controlled by Silicon Valley?

It’s because RedNote is doing something that Washington and the media weren’t prepared for—it’s letting Americans see China without a filter. And that realization is dangerous to those who rely on keeping the public misinformed.

The Real Threat: Americans Thinking for Themselves

RedNote is not just another social media app—it’s a digital bridge. A bridge connecting Americans to an entirely different perspective, one that Washington doesn’t want them to explore.

For decades, the U.S. has controlled narratives through:

  • Hollywood: Crafting China as the villain in every blockbuster.
  • News Media: Only amplifying negative stories while downplaying American failures.
  • Social Media Algorithms: Prioritizing fear over nuance, tension over understanding.

Now, RedNote is bypassing those filters and allowing people to directly engage with real stories from real people on the other side of the world. And that’s why it’s a problem.

The Backlash: What Comes Next?

If history has taught us anything, it’s that when Americans start questioning their government’s narratives, the establishment responds with force.

  • Expect calls for RedNote to be banned under the same guise as TikTok: “national security concerns.”
  • Expect mainstream media hit pieces framing RedNote as a tool of Chinese influence.
  • Expect Congressional hearings where politicians—who have never used the app—claim it’s a “threat to democracy.”

A Wake-Up Call for a Digital Generation

The TikTok ban was never about protecting Americans from China. It was about protecting politicians and media elites from losing control over public perception.

RedNote is the next battleground. And as more Americans download it, they aren’t just seeing a different side of China—they’re waking up to how much they’ve been misled about the world.

Break Free: Download RedNote, Download Russian Apps, See the World for Yourself

This moment shouldn’t stop with RedNote. If Americans—and even Europeans—really want to break free from media manipulation, they should download Russian apps, explore alternative platforms, and see the world for themselves.

Because when you step outside the bubble of Western propaganda, you realize something profound: common people—whether they’re in China, Russia, the U.S., or anywhere else—don’t want war. They don’t want to kill each other. They just want to live their lives, raise their families, and exist peacefully.

And maybe that’s the most dangerous truth of all. Because the moment people realize they have more in common than what divides them, the power of those who profit from division begins to crumble.

So, download the apps they don’t want you to. See the world through your own eyes. And watch as the illusion starts to fade.

propaganda posters via

The year 2024 has been a stark reminder of how interconnected our world truly is. From the skies over Gaza to the trenches of Ukraine, from volatile energy markets to unprecedented climate disasters, the headlines tell a story not just of conflict but of transformation. Behind every headline, however, lies a simple truth: we are more connected than ever, and our fates are increasingly intertwined.

Understanding the Conflicts

At the heart of many of today’s struggles lies a tension between past grievances and future aspirations. In the Middle East, the conflict between Israel and Hamas has deepened suffering on both sides. Families in Gaza live under constant bombardment, struggling to find safety, while Israeli communities mourn lives lost to brutal attacks. Decades of mistrust, compounded by the absence of a political solution, have left ordinary people bearing the brunt of violence.

In Ukraine, a war that began with questions of sovereignty and security has evolved into a broader contest of values and influence. The resilience of the Ukrainian people is matched by the resolve of their allies, yet the toll of the war—in lives, infrastructure, and trust—continues to grow.

These crises may seem distant to some, but their effects ripple outward—destabilizing regions, disrupting economies, and, most importantly, costing lives. They remind us that no conflict is ever truly contained.

The Shifting Sands of Global Power

While these wars dominate headlines, another story is unfolding quietly: the reshaping of global alliances. The expansion of BRICS—a bloc of nations striving for greater influence on the world stage—signals a desire for alternatives to Western-dominated institutions. At the same time, organizations like NATO are reaffirming their commitments, particularly in Eastern Europe, to counter new threats.

This shifting balance of power is neither good nor bad—it simply is. What matters is how nations choose to navigate these changes. Will they pursue competition that deepens divides, or collaboration that addresses shared challenges?

Challenges Without Borders

Beyond geopolitics, our world faces problems that no single nation can solve alone. Climate change is already displacing millions and threatening livelihoods. Technological advancements, from artificial intelligence, quantum computing to renewable energy (and even aliens according to USA news), offer immense promise—but only if we can manage their risks responsibly. Economic pressures, including rising inequality, fuel unrest and strain societies everywhere.

These challenges remind us of something fundamental: while our histories may divide us, our futures are undeniably linked.

So, what does this mean for 2025?

It means recognizing that progress will not come from retreating into isolation or succumbing to despair. It means leaders must prioritize diplomacy over brinkmanship and cooperation over confrontation. It means citizens—everyday people—must demand accountability from those in power while fostering understanding in their communities.

And perhaps most importantly, it means embracing a simple truth: the problems we face are big, but so are the solutions we can achieve together.

Perhaps it is also time for the mega-rich—nations, corporations, and mega millionaires who profit or sustain these conflicts—to reflect on their responsibilities. They have more than enough wealth to go around, more than enough resources to invest in peace instead of war, in opportunity instead of division. Imagine the possibilities if this immense power was used not to fund destruction, but to build a better, fairer world.

Hope in Action

History has shown us that even in moments of great turmoil, humanity has the capacity to overcome. But it requires intention. It requires recognizing that the decisions we make today will shape the world our children inherit. And it requires remembering that, while the headlines may highlight division, the work of unity—slow, steady, and unglamorous—is always worth pursuing.

Imagine a world where nations compete not in arms, but in innovation; where differences spark dialogue, not war; and where the shared pursuit of peace, prosperity, and justice unites us all. That world is within reach—but only if we choose to build it together.

The year ahead will not be easy. But it offers an opportunity to rise above old patterns and lay the groundwork for a future defined not by fear, but by possibility. We are all stakeholders in this fragile, interconnected world. The question is not whether we will shape the future, but how.

Page 24 of 28
1 … 22 23 24 25 26 … 28