Info

Search results for time lapse

Evolution (Burning Man time lapses) from Delrious on Vimeo.

Time lapses at Burning Man 2009.Music by Roy Two Thousand.

“If a single child is trapped under rubble, the world stops. If thousands suffer, we call it a crisis—but we move on. Why?”

We don’t like to admit it, but our empathy has limits. We care deeply about our families, our friends, our communities. But beyond that? Beyond our immediate circles, our borders, our cultures?

Something shifts.

A war breaks out in a distant country. A factory collapse kills hundreds. Refugees flee devastation.

And we scroll past.

Not because we’re bad people. Not because we don’t care. But because something inside us—something ancient, something wired into our survival—tells us: That’s not your problem.

This isn’t just about apathy. It’s about how human nature, technology, and politics work together to turn real people into statistics. And if we don’t challenge it, the consequences are dire.

How Our Brains Trick Us Into Indifference

Science has a name for this: psychic numbing—the way our emotions shut down when faced with large-scale suffering.

  • We feel deeply for one person in pain.
  • We struggle to process the suffering of millions.

Paul Slovic, a researcher on human behavior, calls this the collapse of compassion. The larger the tragedy, the harder it is for our brains to compute.

And it’s not just numbers. It’s distance—physical, cultural, emotional.

  • A friend loses their job? We rally to help.
  • Thousands lose their homes in a country we’ve never visited? We feel bad. But it’s… abstract.

The further someone is from our world, the harder it is to see them as fully human.

This isn’t an excuse. It’s a warning. Because history shows us what happens when we let this instinct go unchallenged.

From Indifference to Dehumanization

We like to believe that atrocities belong to the past. That genocide, war crimes, exploitation—those were the failures of another time.

But here’s the truth: Every mass injustice started with dehumanization.

  • The Holocaust didn’t begin with concentration camps. It began with people being called “vermin.”
  • Slavery didn’t start with chains. It started with the idea that some people were less than others.
  • Refugees drowning in the sea today? We call them a “crisis.” A “wave.” A problem to manage, not people to help.

The moment we stop seeing people as individuals with hopes, fears, and dreams—that’s when anything becomes possible.

And make no mistake: Dehumanization isn’t just something that happens “over there.” It’s happening now. In the way we talk about migrants. Protesters. The poor. The enemy.

This isn’t just about the past. This is about us. Right now.

The Media’s Role: Who Gets to Be a Victim?

Have you ever noticed how some tragedies make headlines for weeks—while others disappear in hours?

It’s not random.

  • A war breaks out in a wealthy country? Wall-to-wall coverage.
  • A famine kills thousands in a nation already struggling? Maybe a news brief—if that.

Why? Because we prioritize the suffering of people who look like us, live like us, think like us.

The media doesn’t create bias. It reflects it. It feeds us the stories we’re most likely to engage with—the ones that feel closest to home.

And what happens to the rest? The wars, the famines, the crises that don’t fit a convenient narrative? They fade into the background.

The world keeps turning. And people keep suffering, unseen.

How We Break the Cycle

If human nature, history, and media all push us toward selective empathy—what do we do about it?

1. Make It Personal

Statistics don’t move people. Stories do.

  • One refugee’s journey is more powerful than a thousand faceless numbers.
  • One family struggling through war is more moving than a death toll.

If you want to care more, seek out the human stories. Don’t let crises become headlines without faces.

2. Notice Who You’re Not Seeing

Next time you’re scrolling, ask yourself:

  • Whose suffering is being ignored?
  • Who is missing from the conversation?
  • Whose pain are we comfortable looking away from?

Challenge the instinct to only empathize with people who remind you of yourself.

3. Stop Using Language That Distances

The moment we call people “migrants” instead of families fleeing for their lives, we detach.
The moment we call people “rioters” instead of citizens demanding justice, we lose the story.

Words matter. They shape how we see the world—and who we decide is worth saving.

4. Take Responsibility for Your Attention

We can’t control global suffering. But we can control what we engage with.

  • Follow journalists who cover forgotten stories.
  • Share voices that aren’t being heard.
  • Stay present with crises that are easy to ignore.

Empathy is a muscle. Use it.

There is a reason history repeats itself: The Cost of Looking Away

Every injustice—every war, every genocide, every mass suffering—began with the same excuse:

“That’s not our problem.”

And if we let that thinking take over, if we let ourselves become numb—then we will watch the next crisis unfold in real time, feel bad for a moment, and move on.

But we don’t have to.

We can fight to see people as they are. To challenge the forces that divide us. To break the cycle before it’s too late.

Because the greatest threat to humanity has never been war, or disease, or disaster.

It’s indifference.

And the choice before us everyday is simple: Will we care, or will we look away?

“Empathy is not a nice-to-have. It’s not a soft skill. It’s the one thing separating a society that thrives from one that tears itself apart.”

Think about the last time you truly felt heard. Not just acknowledged. Not just nodded at. But heard—on a level where someone didn’t just understand your words but understood you.

Now ask yourself—how often does that happen?

We live in a world that celebrates logic, efficiency, and data. Numbers drive decisions. Spreadsheets justify actions. Policies are built on economic forecasts, not lived experiences. But here’s the problem: when we ignore empathy, when we forget that real people are at the heart of every decision, we create systems that may function well on paper but fail spectacularly in practice.

Empathy isn’t a weakness. It’s not some feel-good concept that belongs in TED Talks and therapy rooms. It’s the secret ingredient of leadership, the cornerstone of good policy, the difference between a brand people tolerate and a brand people love. And yet, we continue to undervalue it.

Why?

Why Do We Keep Pushing Empathy Aside?

The world rewards decisiveness, strength, and results. It tells leaders: “Make the hard choices. Stick to the data. Don’t let emotions cloud your judgment.” And sure, numbers matter. Efficiency matters. But when they come at the expense of human connection, we create a world where:

  • Politicians craft policies that look great in reports but devastate communities.
  • CEOs chase profits without realizing they’re crushing the morale of the people keeping their company alive.
  • Brands pour millions into marketing but fail to actually understand their customers.

This isn’t about being soft. It’s about being smart. Because a world without empathy is a world where people feel disconnected—from their leaders, from their jobs, from each other. And when that happens, trust erodes. Loyalty disappears. Progress stalls.

What Happens When Empathy Goes Missing?

Let’s be real: we’re seeing the effects of empathy’s decline everywhere.

  • In politics: Leaders who talk, but don’t listen. Voters who feel unheard and turn to extremes. Policies built for efficiency, not for people.
  • In business: Companies that optimize everything—except human experience. Employees who feel like numbers. Customers who are just data points.
  • In society: Conversations that feel more like battles. Social media debates where the goal isn’t understanding—it’s winning. A world where compassion feels like a liability.

When empathy disappears, society doesn’t collapse overnight. It just starts to fray—slowly, quietly—until one day, we look around and wonder how we got here.

The Leaders Who Get It Right

Now, let’s flip the script.

What do the most respected leaders have in common? What makes certain politicians, CEOs, and cultural icons stand out?

They connect. They listen. They understand not just what people say—but what they mean.

Take @barackobama, for example. Whether you agreed with his politics or not, his ability to connect with people was undeniable. He made people feel seen. He understood that facts alone don’t move people—stories do. Connection does.

Or think about the brands that people love—not just tolerate. The ones that don’t just sell products, but make you feel something Nike. Patagonia. They don’t just talk at you. They get you.

That’s not an accident. That’s empathy.

So, What Do We Do?

If we want a world where leadership actually serves people, where businesses actually understand customers, where conversations actually bring us closer instead of pushing us apart, we need to stop treating empathy like a footnote.

Here’s how:

  1. Redefine Strength. Being “tough” doesn’t mean ignoring emotions. It means understanding them—and making decisions with that understanding in mind.
  2. Make Listening the First Step, Not the Last. Before leaders make policies, before businesses launch products, before we hit “send” on that email—pause. Listen first. Because the best decisions come from understanding, not assumptions.
  3. Reward Connection. Right now, we measure success by profits, efficiency, and speed. But what if we also measured how well we connect? What if we valued emotional intelligence as much as technical skills?

The Bottom Line

Empathy isn’t optional. It’s not a side note. It’s the foundation of everything that works in society.

Great leaders? Empathy.
Great businesses? Empathy.
Great relationships, great movements, great change? It all starts with one thing: the ability to understand and care about someone who isn’t you.

So let’s stop treating empathy like an afterthought. Let’s stop acting like logic and emotion are enemies. Because if we really want to move forward—not just efficiently, but meaningfully—we need to start putting empathy back where it belongs: at the center of everything we do.

Because progress isn’t just about moving forward. It’s about moving forward together.

The Warning from History

On the morning of January 6, 2021, the world watched as a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol. It was a moment of reckoning—chaos unleashed in the heart of the world’s most celebrated democracy.

Some called it a rebellion, others an insurrection. But to an ancient Greek historian named Polybius, it would have been something else entirely: inevitable.

More than 2,000 years ago, Polybius introduced a concept that few remember today, but whose relevance has never been greater: Anakyklosis—the Cycle of Political Evolution. It’s the idea that all governments, no matter how just or noble, are doomed to fall into predictable patterns of corruption, decay, and rebirth. It’s a cycle we have seen time and again, from the fall of Rome to the rise of authoritarian populism in the 21st century.

And if history tells us anything, it’s that the cycle is turning once more in 2025.


The Cycle of Power: From Democracy to Mob Rule

Polybius laid out the six stages of government like a tragic script, one that civilizations unknowingly follow, again and again:

  1. Monarchy (Rule of One – Benevolent) – A strong, wise leader emerges to bring order to chaos.
  2. Tyranny (Rule of One – Corrupt) – Power corrupts, and the leader becomes despotic.
  3. Aristocracy (Rule of the Best – Benevolent) – The best and brightest take over, governing with wisdom.
  4. Oligarchy (Rule of the Few – Corrupt) – The elites grow greedy, consolidating power for themselves.
  5. Democracy (Rule of the Many – Benevolent) The people rise up, demanding a government that serves them.
  6. Ochlokratia (Mob Rule – Corrupt) – Democracy descends into chaos, manipulated by demagogues and misinformation, leading to collapse and the rise of a new monarchy.

Sound familiar? It should. Because right now, the world’s great democracies are teetering on the edge of ochlokratia—mob rule. The signs are all around us in 2025 and maybe earlier than that!


America, Rome, and the Dangers of Late-Stage Democracy

History doesn’t repeat, but it does rhyme. Consider the fall of the Roman Republic:

  • A democratic system once admired, where power was shared among elected officials.
  • A growing divide between the elite and the working class, fueling discontent.
  • The rise of populist leaders who promised to “fix the system” while eroding its foundations.
  • Political violence becoming normalized, as factions turned to force instead of debate.

By the time Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon in 49 BCE, Rome had already crossed a point of no return. Democracy had rotted from within, paving the way for empire.

Now, look around in 2025. The warning signs are eerily similar:

  • Rising wealth inequality—a handful of billionaires hold more wealth than entire nations, with AI-driven economies exacerbating disparities.
  • Populist strongmen winning elections by exploiting public disillusionment, now amplified by deepfake propaganda and AI-manipulated media.
  • A disinformation crisis, where truth is drowned in a sea of conspiracy theories, with major news organizations struggling to compete with viral AI-generated misinformation.
  • Governments increasingly paralyzed by polarization, unable to solve real problems, as social unrest escalates globally.
  • The rise of authoritarian tendencies, with leaders undermining democratic institutions under the guise of “protecting the people,” now armed with digital surveillance and AI-powered state control.

Like Rome before it, modern democracy is not dying from external threats. It is crumbling from within—now at an accelerated pace thanks to technology.


The Digital Age and the Acceleration of Ochlokratia

Polybius never could have predicted social media, but if he had, he would have seen it as the ultimate accelerator of political decay.

In 2025, the situation has worsened. AI-driven content manipulation, hyper-personalized propaganda, and algorithm-driven outrage cycles have turned democracy into a battleground of perception over reality. Deepfake videos, voice clones, and AI-generated political figures blur the line between truth and fiction. The digital public square, once seen as a beacon of democratic engagement, has become an ecosystem of rage-fueled disinformation, rewarding extremism over nuance, engagement over truth.

And so we find ourselves in the final stage of democracy—the moment where people, manipulated by demagogues, AI-driven propaganda, and digital algorithms, turn against the very system meant to protect them.


Can We Break the Cycle?

If the ancient Greeks were right, the natural next step is a return to authoritarian rule—a strongman rising from the ashes, promising to “fix” the broken system, but at the cost of freedom.

But history is not destiny. The cycle is a warning, not a prophecy.

Democracies do not fail overnight. They erode, piece by piece, as citizens grow complacent, as leaders exploit fear, as institutions weaken under the weight of corruption. And yet, history has also shown that the fate of a nation is not written in stone—it is written by those who refuse to let history repeat itself.

The solution does not lie in nostalgia for the past, but in rebuilding trust, strengthening institutions, and restoring civic engagement. It lies in resisting the allure of simple answers to complex problems. It lies in demanding accountability from leaders, media, and ourselves.

In 2025, it also means tackling the AI-driven erosion of democracy, ensuring that technology serves the people rather than manipulates them. We must regulate AI in politics, educate citizens on digital literacy, and push for transparent governance in an age where deception has never been easier.

Polybius gave us the diagnosis. The question now is: Will we choose a different ending?


We stand at a crossroads, just as Rome did, just as every great civilization has before us.

The forces of history are powerful, but they are not absolute.

As Martin Luther King, Jr1.,  once said, “The arc of the moral universe may bend toward justice, but it does not bend on its own.” We, the people, must be the ones to bend it.

Because democracy is not a given. It is a choice. And that choice is ours to make—before history that always tends to repeat itself makes it for us.

Imagine waking up to a world where no secret is safe. Government strategies, bank accounts, and your personal messages—wide open for anyone to see. That’s the terrifying possibility Google’s Willow quantum chip brings to our doorstep. It’s not just a technological leap; it’s a threat that could upend everything we rely on to keep our digital world secure.

Quantum computing is here, and it’s powerful enough to crack the codes that protect our data. The question is: are we ready for what’s coming?


What Is the Willow Chip, and Why Should You Care?

Quantum computing sounds like something out of science fiction, but it’s very real—and very dangerous in the wrong hands. Traditional computers work in bits, ones and zeroes. Quantum computers, like Google’s Willow chip, use qubits, which can be ones, zeroes, or both at the same time. This makes them exponentially faster.

This isn’t about making your laptop quicker or your phone smarter. This is about processing power so massive that it can break through the encryption that protects everything—our government secrets, financial transactions, and personal data.

Encryption is the backbone of our digital lives. It’s what keeps hackers from stealing your bank information, keeps your emails private, and keeps governments from spying on each other’s secrets. Today, encryption works because even the most advanced computers would take millions of years to crack it.

The Willow chip could do it in hours, maybe in seconds?.


What Happens When Encryption Breaks?

Let’s get real about what this means.

  1. Governments Could Lose Control
    National security is built on encrypted communications—plans, negotiations, military operations. If those secrets are exposed, it’s not just embarrassing—it’s dangerous. Foreign adversaries could access sensitive information, and rogue actors could use it to destabilize nations. Wars have been started for less.
  2. Financial Systems Could Collapse
    Banks and financial institutions rely on encryption to protect trillions of dollars. If a quantum computer breaks through, it could wipe out accounts, reroute funds, or cause widespread fraud. Imagine waking up to find your life savings gone—and the bank unable to do anything about it.
  3. Your Personal Privacy Could Disappear
    Think of everything you’ve ever put online: your medical history, your passwords, your private messages. All of it could be exposed. Hackers wouldn’t need to “guess” your passwords anymore; they could decrypt them instantly. The most personal parts of your life could be used against you.

This isn’t paranoia—it’s a logical outcome of what quantum computers like Willow can do if they’re not controlled.


Why This Isn’t a Future Problem—It’s a Now Problem

The scary part is how fast this is moving. The Willow chip is a significant leap forward in quantum computing. It’s not something our current encryption can withstand. And while governments and tech companies are racing to develop “quantum-proof” encryption, they’re not there yet.

The transition to stronger encryption systems is slow. In the meantime, every encrypted piece of data—from your texts to classified government files—could be stored now and cracked later. That means the data you thought was safe today might be stolen and exposed tomorrow.


What Can Be Done?

The good news is that we’re not completely helpless. But action is needed—fast.

  1. Quantum-Resistant Encryption
    Researchers are working on encryption systems that can survive quantum attacks. But developing these solutions isn’t enough. They need to be implemented across the globe, and quickly.
  2. Global Cooperation
    Quantum threats don’t stop at borders. Governments and industries worldwide need to work together to set standards, share knowledge, and defend against these risks. If countries treat this like a solo race, we all lose.
  3. Strict Controls on Quantum Technology
    Just as nuclear technology is closely monitored, quantum computing needs strict regulations. Who gets to use it, and how, should be tightly controlled to prevent its misuse.

The Clock Is Ticking

The Willow chip is a glimpse into a future that’s both thrilling and terrifying. On one hand, quantum computing can revolutionize medicine, climate modeling, and countless other fields. On the other hand, it threatens to destroy the security systems we depend on to keep our world running.

We’ve been here before. The invention of nuclear weapons forced humanity to grapple with the destructive potential of its own brilliance.

Now, we face a similar reckoning with quantum computing. Will we act in time to protect ourselves, or will we wait until it’s too late?

One thing is clear: the world we know today won’t survive unchanged. Whether we come out stronger or more vulnerable depends on what we do right now.

It’s time to wake up—because the future is already here.

By 2040, Elon Musk predicts that robots will outnumber humans. “The pace of innovation is accelerating,” Musk said in a recent interview.

If we keep pushing the boundaries of what machines can do, robots will dominate our workforce and society in ways we can barely imagine.

But here’s the catch: Ι think that this future depends on humanity surviving its own impulses. If we continue to innovate—rather than destroy like we always do with massive-scale wars—this robotic revolution could reshape life as we know it.

Yet the question remains: In a world where robots outnumber humans, who will benefit—and who will be left behind?


Innovation or Destruction? The Path to a Robotic Future

Musk’s vision of a robot-dominated society assumes uninterrupted progress, but history suggests another possibility. Wars, economic collapses, and global unrest have derailed human innovation time and again. If humanity avoids large-scale conflict, the rise of robotics could usher in an era of unprecedented productivity.

But what happens if we don’t? A global war in the age of advanced robotics would transform conflict into a technological arms race, with nations weaponizing machines faster than they can regulate them. What was meant to liberate humanity could be turned against it.


The Companies Building the Future

The robotic revolution isn’t coming out of thin air. The following companies are already leading the charge, creating the machines that could outnumber us by 2040:

  • Tesla: Known for self-driving cars, Tesla is now developing humanoid robots like Optimus, designed to take over repetitive and dangerous tasks.
  • Boston Dynamics: Famous for agile robots like Spot and Atlas, capable of construction, logistics, and even dance routines.
  • SoftBank Robotics: Makers of social robots like Pepper, bridging the gap between humans and machines.
  • Hyundai Robotics: Innovating robots for healthcare, logistics, and urban mobility.
  • Amazon Robotics: Powering warehouse automation with fleets of machines replacing human labor.
  • Fanuc and ABB Robotics: Leading the charge in industrial automation.
  • Agility Robotics: Creators of humanoid robots like Digit, designed for human-centric tasks.

These companies aren’t just building machines—they’re redefining industries.


The Economic Shift: Opportunity or Disaster?

As robots become cheaper, faster, and more efficient, entire industries will be transformed. Some will thrive, while others will collapse under the weight of automation.

  • Jobs Lost: Drivers, factory workers, and retail employees will likely be the first to see their roles automated. Millions could be displaced, with no clear path forward.
  • Jobs Created: Robotics design, AI programming, and ethics oversight will offer new opportunities—but they’ll require advanced skills. Will workers be able to adapt in time?
  • Wealth Inequality: The companies building and owning these robots stand to amass unprecedented wealth. Without government intervention, the divide between the rich and the rest could grow to catastrophic levels.

What Happens to Us?

If robots outnumber humans, do we lose our sense of purpose?

For centuries, work has been central to our identity—our routines, our pride, our place in society. If machines take over, what’s left for us to do?

Some argue that automation could free us to focus on creativity, innovation, and connection. Others worry that mass unemployment will lead to widespread unrest, as billions are left without meaningful roles in society.

As Musk warned, automation could destabilize economies if we’re not careful. The question isn’t whether robots will replace us—it’s what happens when they do.


What Must Be Done

To navigate this future, we need to act now. The robotic age isn’t just a technological challenge—it’s a moral one.

  • Invest in Education: Equip workers with the skills they’ll need in an automated economy. Robotics, coding, and AI should become as foundational as reading and math.
  • Regulate Automation: Governments must ensure that the benefits of robotics are shared equitably, possibly through policies like universal basic income or corporate taxes on automation profits.
  • Foster Global Stability: Without peace, innovation stalls. Nations must prioritize diplomacy and collaboration to prevent conflicts that could weaponize these advances such as the example below.

The Future: A Choice We Must Make

Elon Musk’s prediction isn’t just a vision of technological progress—it’s a test of humanity’s ability to innovate responsibly.

The tools we create have the power to shape the future. But that future is not inevitable—it’s a reflection of the choices we make today.

By 2040, robots may outnumber us, but the question isn’t just what they’ll do—it’s what we’ll become. Will this be a world where machines enhance humanity, or one where they overshadow it?

The robotic revolution is coming. The only question is whether we’ll rise to meet it—or be left behind.

The film records the growth of four types of molds used for food fermentation, namely Rhizopus, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae and Penicillium. Captured by time-lapse supermacro photography, the growth of these molds is magical and charming, revealing a mysterious and gorgeous tiny world. From Beauty of Science

Page 5 of 13
1 3 4 5 6 7 13