Info

Posts tagged advertising

“Empathy is not a nice-to-have. It’s not a soft skill. It’s the one thing separating a society that thrives from one that tears itself apart.”

Think about the last time you truly felt heard. Not just acknowledged. Not just nodded at. But heard—on a level where someone didn’t just understand your words but understood you.

Now ask yourself—how often does that happen?

We live in a world that celebrates logic, efficiency, and data. Numbers drive decisions. Spreadsheets justify actions. Policies are built on economic forecasts, not lived experiences. But here’s the problem: when we ignore empathy, when we forget that real people are at the heart of every decision, we create systems that may function well on paper but fail spectacularly in practice.

Empathy isn’t a weakness. It’s not some feel-good concept that belongs in TED Talks and therapy rooms. It’s the secret ingredient of leadership, the cornerstone of good policy, the difference between a brand people tolerate and a brand people love. And yet, we continue to undervalue it.

Why?

Why Do We Keep Pushing Empathy Aside?

The world rewards decisiveness, strength, and results. It tells leaders: “Make the hard choices. Stick to the data. Don’t let emotions cloud your judgment.” And sure, numbers matter. Efficiency matters. But when they come at the expense of human connection, we create a world where:

  • Politicians craft policies that look great in reports but devastate communities.
  • CEOs chase profits without realizing they’re crushing the morale of the people keeping their company alive.
  • Brands pour millions into marketing but fail to actually understand their customers.

This isn’t about being soft. It’s about being smart. Because a world without empathy is a world where people feel disconnected—from their leaders, from their jobs, from each other. And when that happens, trust erodes. Loyalty disappears. Progress stalls.

What Happens When Empathy Goes Missing?

Let’s be real: we’re seeing the effects of empathy’s decline everywhere.

  • In politics: Leaders who talk, but don’t listen. Voters who feel unheard and turn to extremes. Policies built for efficiency, not for people.
  • In business: Companies that optimize everything—except human experience. Employees who feel like numbers. Customers who are just data points.
  • In society: Conversations that feel more like battles. Social media debates where the goal isn’t understanding—it’s winning. A world where compassion feels like a liability.

When empathy disappears, society doesn’t collapse overnight. It just starts to fray—slowly, quietly—until one day, we look around and wonder how we got here.

The Leaders Who Get It Right

Now, let’s flip the script.

What do the most respected leaders have in common? What makes certain politicians, CEOs, and cultural icons stand out?

They connect. They listen. They understand not just what people say—but what they mean.

Take @barackobama, for example. Whether you agreed with his politics or not, his ability to connect with people was undeniable. He made people feel seen. He understood that facts alone don’t move people—stories do. Connection does.

Or think about the brands that people love—not just tolerate. The ones that don’t just sell products, but make you feel something Nike. Patagonia. They don’t just talk at you. They get you.

That’s not an accident. That’s empathy.

So, What Do We Do?

If we want a world where leadership actually serves people, where businesses actually understand customers, where conversations actually bring us closer instead of pushing us apart, we need to stop treating empathy like a footnote.

Here’s how:

  1. Redefine Strength. Being “tough” doesn’t mean ignoring emotions. It means understanding them—and making decisions with that understanding in mind.
  2. Make Listening the First Step, Not the Last. Before leaders make policies, before businesses launch products, before we hit “send” on that email—pause. Listen first. Because the best decisions come from understanding, not assumptions.
  3. Reward Connection. Right now, we measure success by profits, efficiency, and speed. But what if we also measured how well we connect? What if we valued emotional intelligence as much as technical skills?

The Bottom Line

Empathy isn’t optional. It’s not a side note. It’s the foundation of everything that works in society.

Great leaders? Empathy.
Great businesses? Empathy.
Great relationships, great movements, great change? It all starts with one thing: the ability to understand and care about someone who isn’t you.

So let’s stop treating empathy like an afterthought. Let’s stop acting like logic and emotion are enemies. Because if we really want to move forward—not just efficiently, but meaningfully—we need to start putting empathy back where it belongs: at the center of everything we do.

Because progress isn’t just about moving forward. It’s about moving forward together.

Imagine a world where every thought, every desire, and every aspiration you’ve ever had was subtly planted in your mind—not by friends, family, or personal experience, but by carefully crafted advertisements you’ve been exposed to since birth. What if your concept of happiness, beauty, or success wasn’t truly your own? This is the world we live in, and the consequences are profound.

Image from free pic

The Unseen Influence: How Ads Build Our Baseline Desires

By the time the average person turns 18, they’ve seen over 2 million advertisements. These aren’t just fleeting images; they’re a systematic programming of our desires and beliefs. Advertising doesn’t just sell products; it sells ideals, aspirations, and a vision of how life “should” be.

For example, consider the iconic Coca-Cola holiday ads. They don’t just promote a beverage; they equate drinking Coke with the joy and magic of the holiday season. Repeated exposure to such messaging subtly shifts our emotional connection to brands, associating them with life’s most meaningful moments. Over time, these narratives construct a baseline—a mental framework of what “normal” looks like.

The Hijacking of Identity and Individuality

One of advertising’s most insidious effects is how it co-opts individuality. In a world where self-expression is commodified, choices that feel personal often stem from a menu of pre-packaged options.

Take fashion, for instance. Global campaigns by brands like Nike or Gucci promise uniqueness, yet their mass appeal ensures conformity within narrowly defined boundaries.

A study by the American Psychological Association found that materialism, fueled by advertising, correlates with lower self-esteem and higher levels of anxiety. This creates a paradox: while ads promise individuality and fulfillment, they often homogenize desires, ensuring we’re all striving for a “unique” ideal that millions of others share.

Normalizing Consumerism: The Birth of Eternal Dissatisfaction

By normalizing a culture of consumption, advertisements perpetuate a cycle of perpetual dissatisfaction. Every product promises a solution to a problem you didn’t know you had.

For example, beauty ads often highlight perceived flaws—wrinkles, acne, or dull skin—that require their products to fix. This strategy keeps fulfillment always just one purchase away.

A striking example is the rise of fast fashion. Brands like Zara and H&M churn out trends at breakneck speed, convincing consumers that last month’s clothing is outdated. This has not only environmental consequences but also psychological ones, fostering a mindset where nothing is ever enough.

The Algorithmic Amplification

In the digital age, advertising’s impact has intensified exponentially. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok use algorithms to deliver hyper-targeted ads, exploiting individual vulnerabilities and these tailored messages are far more effective than traditional methods.

Consider the rise of influencer marketing.

When a celebrity or influencer seamlessly integrates a product into their content, the line between authenticity and advertisement blurs. For young minds, this constant exposure creates a distorted sense of reality, where curated perfection becomes the norm.

Can We Break Free?

Understanding the cumulative psychological impact of advertising is the first step toward reclaiming our autonomy. Awareness allows us to question our desires: “Do I really want this, or have I been taught to want it?” It’s a question that can feel unsettling but is essential in untangling personal identity from corporate influence.

One actionable step is fostering media literacy. Teaching children and adults to analyze advertisements critically can empower them to recognize manipulative tactics. For instance, breaking down how ads use colours, emotions, and scarcity to create urgency can demystify their power. Governments and schools should also prioritize stricter regulations and educational programs to reduce the early and pervasive impact of ads.

As we navigate an era of algorithm-driven advertising, the stakes have never been higher

Advertisements don’t just shape what we buy; they shape who we are. They redefine what we consider beautiful, successful, and worthy—often without our conscious consent. By understanding and addressing this cumulative impact, we can begin to dismantle the hidden architecture of desire and reclaim the freedom to define our own values.

The question we must ask ourselves is this: Are we making choices that reflect our true selves, or are we merely acting on impulses carefully cultivated by an industry that profits from our longing? The answer holds the key to a more authentic and fulfilling existence.

Have you ever realized how deeply an advertisement influenced your choices?

Share your story!

Advertising has always wielded an extraordinary ability to influence perceptions, shape desires, and even create societal norms. But in an age where mental health among young people is in crisis—a phenomenon thoroughly explored in Jonathan Haidt’s The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness—advertisers must confront their role in either deepening this crisis or being part of the solution.

Haidt’s analysis reveals a stark reality: the widespread adoption of smartphones, social media, and addictive online gaming has “rewired” childhood. This seismic shift, which he dubs “The Great Rewiring of Childhood,” has replaced outdoor play and face-to-face interactions with screen time, leaving children increasingly isolated, vulnerable, and mentally fragile. These conditions provide fertile ground for advertising to both exacerbate and potentially alleviate mental health struggles.

Amplifying Anxiety: How Advertising Contributes to the Problem

Haidt’s research underscores how smartphones and social media, the primary platforms for modern advertising, fuel harmful social comparisons. Teens—particularly girls—are disproportionately affected. The constant stream of curated perfection, from influencers to brand campaigns, reinforces unattainable ideals and intensifies feelings of inadequacy. Studies cited in The Anxious Generation reveal that teenage girls who spend significant time on social media are three times more likely to develop depression. The parallels between these findings and the tactics many advertisers employ are difficult to ignore.

Advertising often preys on these vulnerabilities. Fear-of-missing-out (FOMO) strategies, the glorification of unattainable lifestyles, and the bombardment of “limited-time offers” and the Yolo lifestyle, along with many influencers tap into the very insecurities Haidt identifies as key drivers of teenage mental illness. The constant stream of curated perfection, from influencers to brand campaigns, reinforces unattainable ideals and intensifies feelings of inadequacy. Campaigns designed to exploit anxieties about beauty, success, or social standing can inadvertently (or intentionally) reinforce the “self-esteem crushing vortex” of social media.

Haidt notes that adolescence is a critical stage of emotional and social development. During this period, constant exposure to shallow online interactions and relentless social comparison—both exacerbated by advertising—can be particularly damaging. Smartphones, as Haidt describes, are “experience blockers,” displacing enriching activities and in-person connections with digital engagement that advertisers fuel with precision targeting.

Advertising as an Alleviator: Opportunities for Positive Impact

Despite its complicity, advertising also holds tremendous potential to address and mitigate the very mental health challenges it has helped perpetuate. Haidt emphasizes the need for systemic solutions, including reducing screen time and creating healthier developmental environments. Advertisers can align with these goals by promoting messages that empower, uplift, and foster genuine connection.

Campaigns such as Dove’s “Real Beauty” and initiatives like the Headspace demonstrate how advertising can counteract harmful cultural norms. By challenging narrow standards of beauty or promoting mental wellness, these campaigns resonate with Haidt’s call for a healthier and more balanced childhood. They also showcase how advertising can foster resilience, inclusivity, and self-acceptance.

Haidt also argues for societal interventions, such as school phone bans and raising the age of internet adulthood to 16. Advertisers could amplify these efforts by supporting initiatives that prioritize mental well-being. For example, brands could create campaigns that advocate for screen-free zones or emphasize the value of face-to-face interactions.

Ethical Advertising in the Age of Anxiety

Haidt’s research provides an urgent reminder that the mental health crisis among young people is a societal issue that demands a collective response. Advertising, as a cultural force, could be part of the solution. The industry must rethink how it leverages emotional targeting, shifting from tactics that exploit insecurities to those that inspire hope and connection.

Haidt’s The Anxious Generation is both a dire warning and a call to action

It challenges all of us—policymakers, parents, educators, and advertisers—to confront the systemic factors driving this mental health crisis. For advertisers, this means recognizing their unique power to influence culture and using it responsibly.

The stories advertising tells about beauty, success, and belonging matter deeply, especially to impressionable adolescents navigating a “phone-based” world. By aligning their strategies with Haidt’s recommendations and focusing on the well-being of their audiences, advertisers can help rewrite the narrative. In doing so, they can contribute to a generation that is not defined by anxiety but by resilience, connection, and empowerment.

This is the moment for the advertising industry to choose: amplify anxiety or alleviate it? The answer will shape not just campaigns, but the mental health of an entire generation.

Image via

The reckless consumerism of the 2020s has given way to something new. Every product on the shelf is regenerative, designed to heal the planet and rebuild communities. Every ad you see isn’t just a promise—it’s a commitment.

But this transformation didn’t come easily. It demanded innovation, courage, and a reckoning with the role advertising plays in shaping society.

Because when every product is sustainable, when every company claims to do good, how do brands stand out? How does advertising remain relevant, or even ethical?

The answer lies at the intersection of technology, transparency, and purpose. This is a future where advertising doesn’t just sell—it inspires. Where AI isn’t just a tool—it’s a force for accountability. And where the stories we tell don’t just move markets—they move humanity forward.


The Shift From Consumption to Connection

Image via

In 2035, advertising is no longer about selling products—it’s about building connections:

  • Connection to the Planet: Ads don’t just highlight features; they showcase how each purchase contributes to restoring ecosystems, from planting forests to cleaning oceans.
  • Connection to People: Brands celebrate equitable supply chains and fair labor practices, proving that every purchase supports communities.
  • Connection to Values: Consumers don’t align with brands for their logos anymore—they align for their leadership in solving humanity’s greatest challenges.

Advertising has always been about more than what we buy. It’s about who we are, what we stand for, and the world we want to leave behind. In this new era, every message must reflect that truth. Because in 2035, what we sell isn’t just a product—it’s a promise to each other and to the future.


The Role of AI in Advertising’s Evolution

Image via

AI has transformed advertising into something more precise, more accountable, and more inspiring than ever before. It’s no longer just about reaching audiences and being only cost-efficient —it’s about understanding them in ways that drive meaningful action.

Here’s how AI shapes the advertising industry in 2035:

  1. Hyper-Personalized Storytelling
    AI doesn’t just create ads—it creates experiences. Every consumer sees a message tailored to their values, their behaviors, and even their emotional state. A single product ad might tell thousands of stories, each uniquely crafted to resonate deeply.
  2. Dynamic Transparency
    AI-powered ads provide real-time updates on sustainability metrics. Tap on a clothing ad, and you’ll see its entire lifecycle: where the cotton was grown, how the factory was powered, and how the garment will be recycled when you’re done with it.
  3. Immersive Campaigns
    With AI and augmented reality, brands create ads that immerse consumers in their impact. Imagine trying on a pair of shoes virtually and watching as forests are replanted in your name.

Radical Transparency: The New Standard

In 2035, trust is everything. Advertising isn’t just about what a product can do—it’s about what it means. Transparency is no longer optional; it’s mandated. Every ad must disclose:

  • The Product’s Lifecycle: From raw materials to end-of-life disposal.
  • Social Impact: How workers were treated and how communities benefit.
  • Regenerative Metrics: The exact carbon offset, water saved, or biodiversity restored by a purchase.

Imagine an ad for a smartphone:

  • Tap the screen, and you’ll see how its recycled components were sourced, the renewable energy powering its production, and the programs it funds to bridge the digital divide in underserved areas.

This isn’t just marketing—it’s accountability and it’s demanded by law from all the governments in our planet


The Consequences of Complacency

But not every brand has leaped. Those who cling to outdated strategies have faded into irrelevance. Greenwashing in 2035 isn’t just unethical—it’s illegal. Brands that fail to deliver on their promises don’t just lose trust—they disappear.

The companies that thrive in this new world are the ones willing to lead—to take risks, to innovate, and to stand for something greater than profit. Because in 2035, doing the right thing isn’t just good business—it’s the only business that matters.


The Role of Advertising in 2035

Advertising in 2035 isn’t about selling dreams—it’s about building futures. It’s about creating movements that inspire people to act, to invest in a better world, and to demand more from the companies they support.

This isn’t just a shift in marketing—it’s a shift in culture.

Picture this:

  • A furniture company’s ad invites you to a virtual experience where you can explore the forests they’ve rewilded through your purchases.
  • A clothing brand runs a campaign offering a subscription for jeans that are repaired, recycled, and replaced—ensuring nothing ends up in a landfill.

These aren’t just ads—they’re promises of a world where business and sustainability work hand in hand.


The stakes have never been higher.

The Advertising Crossroads: Adapt or Become Obsolete

For advertisers, the choice is stark: evolve or vanish. The landscape of advertising has transformed fundamentally by 2035—it’s no longer about mere persuasion, but about creating meaningful platforms for progress.

Each campaign now represents more than a marketing effort; it’s a catalyst for change. Advertisers have the power to educate, inspire, and empower consumers, guiding them towards choices that resonate with their deepest values. But this transformation hinges on a critical element: trust.

The fundamental challenge isn’t about technological innovation or narrative craft. It’s about rebuilding genuine connection in an age of unprecedented transparency and AI-driven precision. Can brands reimagine their role from sellers to partners in collective progress?

The pathway forward demands extraordinary courage. Ethical action is no longer a optional strategy—it’s the fundamental currency of relevance. Brands must recognize that their impact extends far beyond product sales; they are architects of societal transformation.

In 2035, every product is more than a commodity. It’s a promise—to consumers, to communities, to our shared planet. The brands that don’t just make this promise, but fully embody it, will do more than survive. They will be the architects of our collective future.

The choice is clear: Evolve with purpose, or be left behind.

When Algorithms Make Decisions, What Happens to Us?


It starts with a soft chime, just loud enough to catch your attention. You glance at your phone, and there it is: a notification that your groceries are on the way. You didn’t make a list, let alone place an order. Your AI assistant handled everything. It analyzed your pantry, cross-referenced your previous orders, and negotiated the best deals with your preferred stores.

At first, you’re impressed. After all, this is convenience at its finest. But as you unpack the bags later that evening, something feels… off. The coffee is a different brand. The cereal, too. Even the toothpaste isn’t quite right. It’s not what you would’ve chosen.

That’s when it hits you. The assistant didn’t shop for you—it shopped for itself, following priorities set not by your tastes, but by the brands that learned how to win its favor.

This is the new frontier of advertising, where the audience isn’t you anymore. It’s the algorithm. And in this quiet, almost imperceptible shift, the very nature of choice is being rewritten.


A World of Gatekeepers

Advertising, at its core, has always been about connection. It’s the art of understanding people—their desires, fears, and dreams—and crafting stories that speak to them.

For decades, brands poured their energy into winning hearts and minds. A jingle on the radio. A clever slogan on a billboard. A touching ad during the Super Bowl. It was a dance between creativity and emotion, all designed to resonate with you.

But now, the gatekeepers are changing. Instead of speaking directly to people, brands are starting to learn how to appeal to the machines that make decisions for us. Smart assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Home are no longer passive tools; they’re active participants, deciding what products we see, what services we choose, and how we spend our money.

This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a profound transformation of the relationship between consumers, companies, and the algorithms that now stand between them.


The Algorithm Decides

Imagine standing in a grocery store aisle, weighing two options: one cereal is a little cheaper, the other a little healthier. You consider the pros and cons, think about your budget, maybe even remember a jingle from an old commercial. Then you make your choice.

Now imagine that choice is made before you ever step foot in the store. Your smart assistant has already placed the order, choosing the cereal that best aligns with its programmed priorities. Maybe it picked the one with a higher profit margin for the platform. Maybe the brand struck a deal to get on the assistant’s “preferred list.”

You didn’t choose. The algorithm did. And the algorithm didn’t choose for you—it chose based on what served its interests.

This isn’t the future. It’s happening now. AI assistants are already shaping purchasing decisions in subtle but powerful ways. They suggest products, reorder supplies, and guide our choices, often without us realizing it. See what Netflix and Spotify do with their AI suggestions.

And for the brands competing in this new arena, the game is changing. Instead of designing ads to capture your attention, they’re designing strategies to influence the algorithms that hold it.


The Cost of Convenience

There’s no denying the appeal of this AI-driven world. It’s efficient, seamless, and tailored to your needs—or so it seems.

But here’s the question we need to ask: what do we lose in this trade-off?

When machines take over the act of choosing, we lose a little bit of agency. We become passengers in a process that was once deeply personal. Decisions that used to involve thought, reflection, and even a touch of joy are reduced to transactions carried out by systems we barely understand.

And it doesn’t stop there. Smaller brands—those without the resources to compete in this algorithmic marketplace—risk being shut out entirely. Innovation suffers when only the biggest players can afford to play.

Most importantly, we lose transparency. How do we know these systems are working in our best interest? Without oversight, it’s impossible to tell whether your assistant is prioritizing your needs or its own bottom line.


A Future Worth Shaping

This moment asks us to confront some hard truths. The machines we’ve built to simplify our lives are becoming decision-makers in ways we didn’t anticipate. And if we’re not careful, we risk losing control of the very systems we created.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Technology is a tool, not a destiny. With the right choices, we can ensure these systems serve us, not the other way around.

It starts with demanding transparency—from the companies that build these algorithms, from the brands that work with them, and from the policymakers who regulate them. It requires vigilance from all of us to ensure that as technology grows smarter, it also grows fairer.

Most of all, it requires us to stay engaged. To ask questions. To insist on systems that reflect our values, our humanity, and our shared commitment to fairness and choice.


The Responsibility of Progress

Progress isn’t just about what we can build—it’s about who we want to be. It’s not enough to marvel at the efficiency of these systems. We have to ensure they respect our dignity, protect our choices, and serve the greater good.

The rise of AI advertising isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a test of our values. And as we navigate this new world, let’s remember: the best technology doesn’t replace humans It enhances them. This is our moment to shape the future. Let’s make it one we can be proud of.

image via

When Progressive Messaging Meets Backlash: Can Brand Balance Evolution and Loyalty?


A High-Stakes Gamble

Imagine this: A beer company partners with a transgender influencer, hoping to celebrate inclusivity and attract younger audiences. But instead of sparking celebration, the campaign triggers boycotts, viral memes, and millions in lost sales.

Or consider a luxury car brand with a legacy of speed and power suddenly rebranding itself as an electric vehicle icon, dropping its classic logo in favor of a sleeker, modern image. Progress? Sure. But for some longtime fans, it felt like a betrayal of everything the brand once stood for.

As you already know, these aren’t hypothetical scenarios—they’re the reality of woke marketing. It’s a strategy as risky as it is bold, where brands take stances on cultural issues to connect with new audiences, knowing full well they might alienate the ones who got them here

When brands take a stand, are they leading us toward progress, or are they leaving their roots—and their customers—behind?


When Woke Meets Backlash

  • Bud Light: Bridging Inclusivity and Boycotts
    In April 2023, Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for a campaign meant to highlight inclusivity. But the move clashed with the brand’s blue-collar identity, sparking backlash from conservative groups and boycotts that made headlines.Within weeks, sales plummeted, leaving the brand scrambling to rebuild trust. It’s a cautionary tale: Progress without alignment can feel like pandering, leaving brands caught in the crossfire.
  • Jaguar: Evolution or Identity Crisis?
    Jaguar, once synonymous with power and luxury, rebranded itself as a sustainable electric vehicle company in late 2024. The sleek campaign features a modernized logo, omitting the iconic “leaper” and embracing vibrant visuals meant to appeal to younger, eco-conscious woke consumers. But for many Jaguar enthusiasts, the shift felt like the brand was erasing its heritage (Jaguar’s main audience is rich white men). Critics are accusing Jaguar of abandoning its iconic identity, questioning whether the move was more about chasing trends than embracing true innovation.
  • Gillette: Redefining Masculinity
    Gillette’s “The Best Men Can Be” campaign tackled toxic masculinity head-on, encouraging men to hold themselves accountable. Some praised it as bold and necessary. Others felt targeted, arguing that the ad vilified its core audience. The resulting boycotts were a reminder that even the best intentions can divide as much as they inspire.

Why Woke Marketing Often Misses the Mark

Woke marketing isn’t inherently flawed—but its execution often is. Campaigns falter when they overlook these key principles:

  1. Authenticity Matters:
    A beer brand with a traditional image can’t pivot to progressive ideals overnight without alienating its base. Jaguar’s transformation felt abrupt, leaving its core audience questioning the brand’s identity.
  2. Understand the Audience:
    Progressive messaging may resonate with younger demographics but can alienate more traditional consumers. The challenge is finding a way to connect with both without alienating either.
  3. The Perception of Opportunism:
    When a campaign feels like a one-off gesture rather than a genuine reflection of a brand’s values, it risks being dismissed as performative. Consumers aren’t just buying products—they’re buying trust.

Can Brands Bridge the Divide?

Gender fluidity, inclusivity, and sustainability aren’t just trends but reflections of a changing world. And while some brands, like Gucci, thrive on pushing boundaries, others face an uphill battle when stepping into these conversations.

When brands address identity and culture, they’re not just shaping their image—they’re shaping our shared story. And that story has to be built on more than a tagline. It has to be built on truth.

The key is finding balance. Bud Light’s misstep wasn’t in embracing inclusivity—it was in doing so without fully considering its audience. Jaguar’s pivot toward sustainability wasn’t wrong—how quickly it abandoned its legacy and target audience created resistance.


A Path Forward for Conscious Marketing

Woke marketing isn’t about choosing sides. It’s about finding a way to connect across divides. To succeed, brands must:

  • Lead with authenticity, ensuring their actions match their messaging.
  • Understand their audience, balancing tradition with evolution.
  • Focus on human stories that foster empathy, rather than shock value.

It’s not about whether you take a stand—it’s about how you stand. Are you bridging divides, or widening them? Are you leading with purpose, or chasing trends?


Imagine a world where brands take bold stances without losing their roots.

The power of a brand isn’t just in what it sells. It’s in what it stands for. And the brands that lead with courage, authenticity, and purpose will be the ones shaping a better, more connected world.

Because in the end, woke marketing isn’t just about making headlines. It’s about making a difference.

image via

After watching the fascinating documentary below, Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy I was wondering whether increased Transparency in advertising would Change the Game


What’s Really in the Fine Print?

Imagine you’re watching a car commercial. It’s a sleek electric SUV driving through pristine mountains, the narrator extolling its eco-friendly features. But then, instead of ending with a catchy tagline, the screen flashes a message: “This vehicle’s production and transportation generate 17 metric tons of CO₂ emissions.”

Now picture a fast-food ad. A juicy burger spins across the screen, fries perfectly golden, the soda fizzing in slow motion. But beneath the tagline, another line reads: “This meal contributes to a 35% higher risk of obesity if consumed regularly.”

It’s uncomfortable, isn’t it? The kind of transparency that strips away the illusion and forces us to confront the real cost of our choices.

Advertising tells us what to buy, but it rarely tells us what that choice costs—not just in dollars/euros, but in the impact it has on our health, our environment, and our future.


The Case for Radical Transparency

Advertising is storytelling. It’s designed to captivate, persuade, and sometimes distract. But what happens when we demand from all brands to tell us the full story? When the glossy veneer of marketing is peeled back to reveal uncomfortable truths?

What if advertising didn’t just sell us products, but also sold us accountability? What if every ad had to legally came with a receipt—not just for the price tag, but for the cost your choice makes on the world around you?

Here’s what could happen:

  • Empowered Consumers:
    Imagine walking into a store armed with the full picture. You’re not just buying clothes; you’re choosing between a sustainable option and one made under questionable labour practices. Transparency could give consumers the tools to align their spending with their values.
  • Pressure on Brands:
    Brands would no longer be able to greenwash their way out of responsibility. A beauty company couldn’t hide behind the word “natural” if their supply chain harmed ecosystems.
  • A Race for Responsibility:
    In a world where societal impact disclosures are mandatory, the brands with the cleanest records would stand out. Ethical practices would become a competitive advantage, not just a PR strategy.

Real-Life Parallels: We’ve seen hints of this kind of transparency before.

Tobacco companies are required to display health warnings on packaging and more and more people are quitting smoking. Pharmaceutical ads list side effects, sometimes humorously downplayed but still present.

What if these standards extended to every industry? What if every ad—not just for products that harm our health—had to disclose its societal cost and impact?


Would It Lead to Better Choices—or Just Better Ads?

The central question remains: Would transparency drive meaningful change, or would brands simply become better at crafting the illusion of responsibility? Knowing the truth doesn’t always change behaviour. But if we never know the truth, how can we even begin to make better choices?

Transparency, in theory, could transform the way we think about consumption and change our behaviour. But as the Netflix documentary Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy reveals the truth about our purchases is often hidden behind many layers of spin and manipulation and to change that you need government support.


A Vision for Accountability in Advertising

Imagine a world where brands were as proud of their ethical practices as they were of their profits. Where consumers make choices based not just on what they want, but on what aligns with their values.

Transparency won’t solve every problem. But it’s a step—a step toward a society where businesses are accountable for more than their bottom line, and where consumers have the power to demand more for their lives, their society and their planet.

We can’t change what we don’t see. And when we start to see the full picture, we just might create a marketplace where doing good isn’t just possible—it’s profitable.


Page 1 of 21
1 2 3 21