What an extraordinary, soul-stirring speech. Watch it …it will move you to tears. She speaks raw truth, and the truth thunders louder than all the lies. For the first time in a long while, it gave me hope especially in a world suffocated by corrupt politicians, oligarchs and ceos
Posts tagged politics
Choose another tag?
The Rule of a Hundred: How the World’s Dynasties Quietly Captured Democracy
A century ago, royal families held crowns. For some strange reason Kings and Queens still exist today, In a supposedly rational, democratic world, crowns should be relics, but the system keeps monarchs around because they make inherited power seem traditional rather than predatory !
But today we have also the new royals, about one hundred dynasties of families whose fortunes stretch across oil fields, banks, tech platforms, and retail empires wield a quieter, but no less absolute, power. They do not command armies. They command accountants, lawyers, lobbyists, and media empires. Their strength lies not in overthrowing governments but in reshaping them, invisibly, until entire nations mistake oligarchy for democracy.
How they play the system
From the Waltons in Arkansas to the Mars family, the Kochs, the Ambanis in India, the Quandts in Germany, the Bettencourts in France, the Lee dynasty in South Korea, the Al Nahyans in Abu Dhabi — the list is long but finite. Roughly one hundred families sit at the heart of today’s oligarchic order. Collectively, they control trillions. Collectively, they have written tax codes, trade rules, and labor laws that preserve their grip.
- In Delaware filings, Koch-aligned nonprofits show how donations created tax deductions while financing lobbying that gutted environmental rules.
- In European court records, Quandt trusts routed profits through Guernsey, trimming hundreds of millions from their tax bills.
- In India, Ambani family subsidiaries secured spectrum licenses under favorable terms after generous political donations.
Each example on its own is outrageous. Together, they show a system functioning exactly as designed: rules bent so dynastic wealth compounds, while accountability shrinks.
The architecture of impunity
Leaks from Panama, Paradise, and Pandora Papers made it clear: offshore secrecy is not a loophole. It is infrastructure. Law firms from Panama to Zurich, accountants in London, and banks in New York build mirrored worlds where money is both everywhere and nowhere. Ordinary citizens cannot enter. Politicians rarely challenge it, because their own campaigns depend on it.
The human cost
In Greece, austerity hollowed out hospitals and schools while shipping families paid virtually nothing in taxes. In the U.S., billionaires’ pandemic tax breaks coincided with mass evictions. In Africa, mining royalties were siphoned offshore while local communities drank poisoned water. Every line in an offshore trust deed has a cost — measured in closed wards, unpaid teachers, and poisoned rivers.
The laundering of legitimacy
Philanthropy is the modern confessional. A dynasty funds an art museum wing or a global health initiative. The donation wins headlines and tax write-offs. But the power remains untouched. Sometimes the very money that closed a hospital is recycled into the nameplate above its replacement wing.
The reckoning
The TikTok video above of “ 100 families” is probably right in number and right in spirit. The truth is actually grimmer: about one hundred dynasties have captured democracy not with tanks, but with tax codes and shell companies. They have built an invisible crown, shared among them, passed silently from generation to generation and the whole planet, more than 8 billion people most of them living with scraps are OK with this.
So I have to ask: in a world where billionaires already play kings without crowns, why do we still bow to the ones who wear them? Why do we cheer for monarchs who inherit palaces while we inherit debt, precarity, and silence? Haven’t we had enough of crowns and dynasties, of bloodlines and backroom empires, of living as subjects instead of citizens? The pageantry is a distraction; the slavery is real. The time has come to wake up, tear off the invisible crown, and choose a future where no family, royal or billionaire, owns the destiny of billions. Maybe it is time for the 8 billion to wake up and claim the life they want.
We’re Experts in Fascism. We’re Leaving the U.S. | NYT Opinion
Legal residents of the United States sent to foreign prisons without due process. Students detained after voicing their opinions. Federal judges threatened with impeachment for ruling against the administration’s priorities. In this Opinion video, Marci Shore, Timothy Snyder and Jason Stanley, all professors at Yale and experts in authoritarianism, explain why America is especially vulnerable to a democratic backsliding — and why they are leaving the United States to take up positions at the University of Toronto. Professor Stanley is leaving the United States as an act of protest against the Trump administration’s attacks on civil liberties. “I want Americans to realize that this is a democratic emergency,” he said. Professor Shore, who has spent two decades writing about the history of authoritarianism in Central and Eastern Europe, is leaving because of what she sees as the sharp regression of American democracy. “We’re like people on the Titanic saying our ship can’t sink,” she said. “And what you know as a historian is that there is no such thing as a ship that can’t sink.” She borrows from political and apolitical Slavic motifs and expressions, arguing that the English language does not fully capture the democratic regression in this American moment. Professor Snyder’s reasons are more complicated. Primarily, he’s leaving to support his wife, Professor Shore, and their children, and to teach at a large public university in Toronto, a place he says can host conversations about freedom. At the same time, he shares the concerns expressed by his colleagues and worries that those kinds of conversations will become ever harder to have in the United States. “I did not leave Yale because of Donald Trump or because of Columbia or because of threats to Yale — but that would be a reasonable thing to do, and that is a decision that people will make,” he wrote in a Yale Daily News article explaining his decision to leave. Their motives differ but their analysis is the same: ignoring or downplaying attacks on the rule of law, the courts and universities spells trouble for our democracy.
The Liberalism to Fascism Pipeline
Is Democracy Safe from AI—Or Just on Borrowed Time?
The end of democracy rarely arrives with sirens and flames. More often, it fades quietly—choice by choice, habit by habit, until the rituals remain but the substance has gone.
In their timely paper, Don’t Panic (Yet), Felix Simon and Sacha Altay remind us that the AI apocalypse never arrived in 2024. Despite a frenzy of deepfakes and fears of algorithmic manipulation, the great elections of that year were not decided by chatbots or microtargeted propaganda. The decisive forces were older and more human: politicians who lied, parties who suppressed votes, entrenched inequalities that shaped turnout and trust.
Their conclusion is measured: mass persuasion is hard. Studies show political ads, whether crafted by consultants or large language models, move few votes. People cling to their partisan identities, update beliefs only at the margins, and treat most campaign noise as background static. The public is not gullible. Even misinformation, now turbocharged by generative AI, is limited in reach by attention, trust, and demand.
In this sense, Simon and Altay are right: the panic was misplaced. AI was not the kingmaker of 2024.
But here is the danger: what if reassurance itself is the illusion?
The great risk of AI to democracy does not lie in a single election “hacked” by bots. It lies in the slow erosion of the conditions that make democracy possible. Simon and Altay diagnose panic as a cycle society overreacts to every new medium. Yet what if this is not a panic at all, but an early recognition that AI represents not another medium, but a structural shift?
Democracy depends on informational sovereignty citizens’ capacity to orient themselves in a shared reality. Generative AI now lives inside search engines, social feeds, personal assistants. It does not need to persuade in the crude sense. It reshapes the field of visibility what facts surface, what stories disappear, what worlds seem plausible.
Simon and Altay show that persuasion is weak. But erosion is strong.
- Trust erodes when deepfakes and synthetic voices make truth itself suspect.
- Agency erodes when predictive systems anticipate our preferences and feed them back before we form them.
- Equality erodes when the wealthiest campaigns and nations can afford bespoke algorithmic influence while the rest of the citizenry navigates blind.
In 2024, democracy endured not because AI was harmless, but because old buffers mainstream media, partisan loyalty, civic inertia still held. These reserves are not infinite. They are the borrowed time on which democracy now runs.
So yes: panic may be premature if we define it as fearing that one election will be stolen by machines. But complacency is suicidal if we fail to see how AI, fused with the logics of surveillance capitalism, is hollowing democracy from within.
The question is not whether AI will swing the next vote. The question is whether, by the time we notice, the very meaning of choice will already have been diminished.
Democracy may survive a storm. What it cannot survive is the slow normalization of living inside someone else’s algorithm.
Diella: The AI Minister That Might End Corruption or Perfect It
Only in Albania could such a mythic gesture occur: appointing an algorithm as cabinet minister. Diella, we are told, will cleanse public procurement of corruption, that timeless Balkan disease. The government proclaims that, at last, software will succeed where generations of politicians failed.
Permit me some skepticism.
Public procurement remains the deepest vein of corruption not because ministers are uniquely wicked, but because the system demands it. Contracts worth billions hinge on opaque decisions. Bribes are not accidents; they are the lubricant that keeps political machines alive. To imagine an algorithm can sterilize this mistake mathematics for morality.
Worse, Diella may render corruption not weaker but stronger. Unlike a human minister who can be interrogated, shamed, toppled, an algorithm offers no face to confront. If a contract flows to the prime minister’s cousin’s company, the defense comes immediate and unassailable: the machine decided. How convenient.
Algorithms never impartial. Written, trained, tuned by people with interests. Corruption, once visible in smoky cafés and briefcases of cash, risks migrating invisibly into code—into criteria weighted here, data sets adjusted there. Easier to massage inputs than to bribe a minister. Harder to detect.
This does not resemble transparency. It resembles radical opacity dressed in the costume of objectivity.
So let us be clear: Albania’s experiment counts as bold. It may inspire imitators across a continent exhausted by graft. But boldness and danger travel as twins. Diella will either cleanse the bloodstream of public life or sanctify its toxins in digital armor.
Do not be fooled by rhetoric. If citizens cannot audit code, if journalists cannot interrogate criteria, if rivals cannot challenge outputs, Albania has not abolished corruption. It has automated it.
The irony cuts deep. A government that promises liberation from human vice may have just built the perfect machine for laundering it.
When Leaders Collapse, Crowds Take Over
In the past week, the headlines have been relentless. Nineteen Russian drones breach Polish airspace. Israel bombs Gaza and Yemen in one sweep. NATO talks about invoking Article 4 for the first time in years. Two cargo ships sink in the Red Sea. Taiwan holds its largest military drill in history. Putin and Kim join Xi in show of strength as China unveils new weapons at huge military parade
At the same time, governments fall. Nepal’s prime minister resigns after anti-corruption protests. France’s Bayrou government collapses in a confidence vote. Indonesia reshuffles its cabinet and markets nosedive. In Kenya and Serbia, the streets erupt. In Utah, an American political activist is shot dead on stage.
It would be easy to treat these as separate stories. Different continents, different crises. But together they tell a larger truth: the global political order is bleeding legitimacy faster than it can patch itself up.
The Era of Illusion Is Over
For decades, leaders managed to buy time. They could distract with new slogans, reshuffled cabinets, emergency meetings, endless promises that reform was just around the corner. Those tricks no longer work. From Kathmandu to Paris, from Belgrade to Nairobi, the crowd has stopped believing.
What remains is exposure. Leaders who once cloaked themselves in the language of competence now look like what they are: administrators of decline. They rename the US Department of Defense the “Department of War” as if language can mask failure. They build alliances, break alliances, start wars, all while housing costs soar and wages stagnate.
The mask is gone. The anger is raw.
When Leaders Collapse, Streets Take Over
Charlie Kirk’s assassination in Utah shocked America not only because of the act itself, but because it revealed something darker: politics is no longer theatre. Rhetoric now bleeds into violence. The same mistrust that drives Nepali youth to topple a prime minister fuels armed rage in the United States.
In Serbia, protesters risk bullets to shout down corruption. In Kenya, crowds flood the streets, refusing to be silenced by tear gas. Each eruption may look local, but together they form a global bonfire.
People have had it. They are tired of elites who hoard wealth, trade influence, and pretend to govern while reality disintegrates. They no longer trust the ballot box to deliver justice. So they march. They burn. They occupy. They imagine power without politicians.
The Real Crisis
The gravest crisis today is not Russian drones over Poland or missiles in Gaza. It is not even the collapse of one government after another. The real crisis is legitimacy. The belief that leaders are capable of governing in the public interest has snapped.
Without legitimacy, armies are just men with weapons. Parliaments are just rooms with microphones. The entire edifice of modern politics—states, treaties, elections—rests on a fragile foundation of consent. That consent is eroding everywhere at once.
What Comes Next
When leaders collapse, crowds do not go home. They take up space. They organize. They experiment. What begins as rage can grow into something else: a refusal to return to normal. The old world of managed decline is cracking. What replaces it is still unknown, but it will not be built by the politicians who failed us.
That is the real lesson of this week. From NATO’s panic to Nepal’s fall, from the streets of Nairobi to the assassination in Utah, the story is not about isolated events. It is about the collapse of patience on a planetary scale.
The world has stopped waiting for leaders to lead.