Info

Posts tagged advertising

Choose another tag?

Ad spend is falling. Only what proves ROI will survive.

Let’s start with the headline stat:
📉 54% of marketers worldwide plan to cut ad budgets in 2025.
📉 In Europe, it’s even worse—60%.

This isn’t a trend.
This is a reset.

And in a world where money is tight, there’s one new rule:

No proof, no budget.

Why It’s Happening

According to Nielsen’s 2025 Annual Marketing Report, marketers are reacting to:

  • Economic uncertainty
  • Supply chain instability
  • Sluggish consumer demand
  • Pressure from the CFO to cut anything that isn’t measurable

The result?
Marketing teams are being told:
👉 “Do more with less.”
👉 “Show me it worked, or don’t do it again.”

What It Means for You

Here’s how the landscape is shifting:

✅ What Stays❌ What Gets Cut
Digital with clear metricsBrand campaigns with no follow-up
Performance marketingAwareness-only TV buys
Retail Media Networks (RMNs)“Spray and pray” display ads
Connected TV with targetingVanity metrics (reach, impressions)
Tools that show ROITactics you can’t track

The Big Takeaway: ROI or Die

Nielsen found that 60% of marketers globally now prioritize return on investment—not just reach or awareness.
And guess what?
Most marketers still can’t measure their full campaigns properly.

Only 32% measure digital and traditional media together.
In Europe, it’s even lower—just 23%.

That means most brands are spending blind.

So What’s Working?

📈 Connected TV (CTV):
56% of marketers plan to increase spending here—it’s digital, trackable, and can replace expensive TV spots.

📈 Retail Media Networks (RMNs):
Think Amazon, Walmart, Uber, or even big travel apps. They offer closed-loop measurement—you can see exactly who saw your ad and bought your product. That’s budget gold.

📈 AI-powered campaigns:
Marketers love it for speed, personalization, and media optimization.
(And yes, it’s cheaper than hiring 5 analysts.)

What to Do Now

You don’t need to panic.
You need to prove.

Here’s your 3-part playbook:

1. Only run what you can measure.

Every campaign should show how it impacts revenue, conversions, or growth.

2. Switch to ROI-first channels.

If you can’t show what worked—on paper—it’s a risk.
CTV, retail media, search, and email are safer bets than brand ads with no call to action.

3. Bring finance into marketing.

Treat your campaigns like investments.
Every dollar spent should have a thesis, a goal, and a post-mortem.

This Isn’t Budget Cuts. It’s Budget Evolution.

You’re not losing money.
You’re losing unaccountable spending.

From now on, your best campaign isn’t your most creative.
It’s the one that comes with a receipt.

How the pitch deck went synthetic—and why your pricing model is next.

1. A Quiet Revolution in the War Room

According to Business Insider, top agencies are no longer pitching with just moodboards and mad men.
They’re pitching with:

  • Midjourney visuals
  • AI-voiced scripts via ElevenLabs
  • AI-written concepts from ChatGPT

And here’s the twist: they’re winning.
Not because the ideas are better. But because they’re faster, cheaper, and more polished in less time.

The creative work didn’t die.
It just got automated—and upgraded.

2. Altman’s Warning Wasn’t Wrong. It Was Understated.

When Sam Altman said, “AI will replace 95% of marketing jobs,” people scoffed.
But read closer: he wasn’t predicting mass unemployment.
He was pointing at the automation of everything repetitive, templated, and slow.

He wasn’t warning marketers.
He was warning their business model.

3. What’s Actually Collapsing?

Not talent. Not creativity.
What’s collapsing is how we charge for it.

YesterdayToday
Billable hoursUnlimited iterations via AI
Manual productionAutomated asset generation
Big teamsSmall teams + AI + IP

If you make money by selling time, you’re already behind.
AI doesn’t need time.
It generates volume instantly and variation endlessly.

4. What Clients Are Really Paying For Now

You can’t charge for what machines do better.
You can charge for what machines can’t replicate:

  • Original strategy frameworks
  • Taste + cultural intuition
  • Brand-defining strategy
  • IP assets (reusable, ownable systems)
  • Proprietary data and decision engines

This is what Altman means by strategic leverage—not just prompts, but power structures built on IP.

5. Agencies Must Stop Selling Output. Start Selling Ownership.

Here’s where everything changes:

Old ModelNew Model
“We made this campaign”“We built this reusable system”
“We charged for time”“We license our IP”
“We delivered one solution”“We created frameworks you own”

Instead of pitching one-off ideas, agencies must build platforms, not presentations.

Example:
One AI-generated brand voice tool → licensed to 10 clients → €10K/month each.
No team burnout. No time tracking. Just scale.

6. So What Now?

Agencies that survive this shift will:

  1. Build proprietary AI workflows
  2. Own their own data and frameworks
  3. License thinking, not hours
  4. Price for access, not output

The future is fewer meetings, more models.
Fewer revisions, more royalties.

AI didn’t kill the creative industry.
It will force it to grow up.

From time-based billing to value-based ownership.
From pitching ideas to monetizing intelligence.

As Altman warned, the machines are coming.
But the smart ones?
They’re not just automating work.
They’re rewriting the invoice.

The Quiet Rebellion of Becoming a Maker in a World of Shoppers

They told you who you were in price tags.

Your taste? That’s your streaming algorithm.
Your vibe? It’s your sneakers, your iPhone case, your skincare routine.
Your tribe? It’s who you follow, what you order, what you wear.

We used to introduce ourselves with names.
Now we do it with brands. We all try to create our personal brands and interact with them.

And it’s no accident.
Because if they can convince you that identity lives in the checkout cart,
they never have to teach you how to create your own.

The Subtle Lie of Lifestyle

Capitalism doesn’t just sell things.
It sells selves.
Curated. Packaged. Predictable.

You don’t like oat milk. You’re an Oat Milk Person™.
You didn’t just go to Burning Man. You are Burning Man.
You didn’t just buy a Tesla. You bought virtue, tech-savviness, and status in one click.

But here’s the catch:
Consumption is hollow.
No matter how much you buy, you’re always left with more craving than clarity.

Because deep down, we all know:

You don’t become someone by choosing between flavors.
You become someone when you build something real.

Creation: The Lost Mirror

When was the last time you made something that wasn’t for likes or money?
A story.
A garden.
A tool.
A ritual.
A real moment of care that couldn’t be posted?

We’ve forgotten the texture of selfhood that comes from effort.
From choosing your own inputs. From sitting in the friction of making.

Because building is slow. Messy. Unmonetized.
Which is exactly why it’s yours.

You Are Not a Brand. You Are a Builder.

We’ve been trained to curate ourselves like storefronts.
But your soul isn’t a product page.

You are not the shoes you saved up for.
You are the conversation you started.
You are the community you shaped.
You are the words you strung together when you didn’t know if they’d land.
You are the thing you made when no one was watching.

That is identity.


Not what you signal.
What you sow.

A Personal Vow

I don’t want to be remembered for what I owned.
I want to be remembered for what I offered.
I want my life to be proof that I made something out of the chaos—
even if it didn’t scale. Even if it didn’t sell. Even if no one clapped.

Because in a world designed to reduce us to shoppers,

creation is a quiet form of rebellion.

You are not what you buy.
You are what you build.

Don’t forget that.
Everything else is advertising and nonsense!

We didn’t guard it. We leased it. For €380.

The night above Athens lit up—not with constellations or gods, but with a sneaker.
Outlined in drones.
Branded with Adidas.
Floating above the Parthenon like a corporate halo.

€380.
That’s what it cost to turn the sky over Western civilization’s most sacred site into a product launch.

Not per drone.
Not per second.
Total.

The Ministry of Culture said they didn’t know.
Which means they’re either lying, or irrelevant.
Possibly both.

The Ritual of Soft Colonization

@theculturemuse

Stumbled on this in #athens tonight #drone #droneshow #adidas #greece #ellas #ellinikotiktok #foryoupage❤️❤️ #fyp

♬ Light in the Dark – Violin Sky

This wasn’t a marketing stunt. It was a symbolic coup.

The gods have been replaced.
Not by philosophers or poets.
By CMOs and drone operators.

Adidas didn’t run a campaign.
They performed a ritual:
— Erase the sacred
— Replace it with spectacle, replace it with nonsense
— Watch the cameras roll

Art Gets Denied. Ads Get Airspace.

Oscar-nominated director Yorgos Lanthimos was denied access to film at the Acropolis.
But Adidas?
They get prime time, front row to eternity—no questions asked.

Because in this new Greece:
If you tell stories, you wait.
If you sell shoes, the sky is yours.

Who’s Really Behind the Curtain?

Let’s be clear:
Adidas didn’t do this alone.
They had help—from the local agency and brand teams who knew the terrain, looped the loopholes, and signed off.

Let’s name what this is: Cultural laundering.

They didn’t just drop drones.
They laundered visibility through heritage—and turned sacred space into a hype reel.

To the Greek agency who helped this happen:
You didn’t elevate the brand.
You sold your history for a case study.

To the marketers who called this visionary:
You don’t understand legacy.
You understand reach.

This Wasn’t Creativity. It Was Cowardice.

Agencies love to posture about purpose, storytelling, culture.
But when faced with power, they fold.

Because it’s easier to fly a logo over the Acropolis than to build meaning that lasts.

The Real Cost of the Campaign

€380.
That’s all it took to dim the light of Athena.

That’s not clever.
That’s not disruptive.
That’s desperate.

If we sell our myths for the price of a sneaker,
What will we have left
When the batteries die?

The gods didn’t leave us.
We traded them.


For impressions.
For metrics.
For branded content.

The Parthenon glows now—not with truth or triumph—but with product.

And maybe that was the point all along.

Because just days before this stunt lit up the sky, Greek politicians quietly voted to allow family members of public officials to own companies abroad.
No scrutiny. No shame. No uproar.

So maybe the sneaker in the sky dominating the news today was no accident. Maybe this is a way to deflect public opinions.
Maybe it’s just branding catching up with politics.
A culture where everything sacred is for sale, and everyone with power is off the record.

The question is no longer “How did this happen?”
It’s:

What haven’t we sold yet? If our myths, monuments, and morals are all for sale—what does it even mean to be a nation?

Jaguar’s failed rebrand reveals more than bad creative. It exposes the cowardice of brand leadership.

Jaguar’s latest campaign said, “Copy Nothing.”
But what they launched copied one thing perfectly: the corporate tradition of blaming the agency when leadership gets it wrong.

No cars. No curves. No roar.
Just abstract visuals, minimalist slogans, and a branding exercise so out of touch, even Elon Musk publicly mocked it. The campaign was lambasted as empty, confusing, and emotionally tone-deaf. A luxury car brand… that showed no cars.

The public hated it.
Critics laughed at it.
And @Jaguar?
They fired the ad agency.

But here’s the real story: Who briefed the agency? Who approved the decks? Who nodded in the boardroom and said, “Yes, let’s hide the cars”?

The creatives didn’t conjure this campaign in a vacuum. Someone paid for it, approved it, championed it.

That someone is still sitting in Jaguar’s leadership.

The Real Problem: Vision Without Accountability

This isn’t about a bad campaign. This is about a broken model—one where agencies are hired as scapegoats, not strategic partners.

In today’s brand world, storytelling is strategy. The brief is the vision. If that vision is flawed, no amount of creative genius can salvage it. You can’t out-art direct a confused identity.

And Jaguar’s identity right now? A luxury brand sprinting toward electric futurism while ghosting its legacy, its product, and its soul.

What did they expect the agency to do—turn vapor into velocity?

When the Brief Is Rotten, the Brand Fails

Let’s be clear: agencies aren’t perfect. But they don’t control the product, the pricing, or the internal politics. They don’t choose whether the car appears in the campaign. That comes from the client.

We’ve seen this before:

Agencies don’t greenlight madness. They’re handed it.

The Cowardice of Creative Blame

What we’re watching isn’t just a brand misstep. It’s a case study in corporate cowardice. A company trying to reinvent itself—without the courage to own its decisions.

The truth? Jaguar’s problem isn’t the ad agency. It’s that the people steering the ship don’t know what destination they’re heading toward—so they blame the compass when they get lost.

A New Standard for Brand Leadership

We need to stop letting executives escape through the back door while their agencies are thrown under the bus.

If you brief it, own it. If you approve it, stand by it. If you kill it, don’t outsource the executioner.

Because marketing isn’t a magic trick. It’s an expression of vision. And when a rebrand collapses, it’s not the messenger who failed—it’s the strategist who didn’t know what they stood for.

Final Words:

If the story sucks, don’t shoot the storyteller.
Fire the author.

“Empathy is not a nice-to-have. It’s not a soft skill. It’s the one thing separating a society that thrives from one that tears itself apart.”

Think about the last time you truly felt heard. Not just acknowledged. Not just nodded at. But heard—on a level where someone didn’t just understand your words but understood you.

Now ask yourself—how often does that happen?

We live in a world that celebrates logic, efficiency, and data. Numbers drive decisions. Spreadsheets justify actions. Policies are built on economic forecasts, not lived experiences. But here’s the problem: when we ignore empathy, when we forget that real people are at the heart of every decision, we create systems that may function well on paper but fail spectacularly in practice.

Empathy isn’t a weakness. It’s not some feel-good concept that belongs in TED Talks and therapy rooms. It’s the secret ingredient of leadership, the cornerstone of good policy, the difference between a brand people tolerate and a brand people love. And yet, we continue to undervalue it.

Why?

Why Do We Keep Pushing Empathy Aside?

The world rewards decisiveness, strength, and results. It tells leaders: “Make the hard choices. Stick to the data. Don’t let emotions cloud your judgment.” And sure, numbers matter. Efficiency matters. But when they come at the expense of human connection, we create a world where:

  • Politicians craft policies that look great in reports but devastate communities.
  • CEOs chase profits without realizing they’re crushing the morale of the people keeping their company alive.
  • Brands pour millions into marketing but fail to actually understand their customers.

This isn’t about being soft. It’s about being smart. Because a world without empathy is a world where people feel disconnected—from their leaders, from their jobs, from each other. And when that happens, trust erodes. Loyalty disappears. Progress stalls.

What Happens When Empathy Goes Missing?

Let’s be real: we’re seeing the effects of empathy’s decline everywhere.

  • In politics: Leaders who talk, but don’t listen. Voters who feel unheard and turn to extremes. Policies built for efficiency, not for people.
  • In business: Companies that optimize everything—except human experience. Employees who feel like numbers. Customers who are just data points.
  • In society: Conversations that feel more like battles. Social media debates where the goal isn’t understanding—it’s winning. A world where compassion feels like a liability.

When empathy disappears, society doesn’t collapse overnight. It just starts to fray—slowly, quietly—until one day, we look around and wonder how we got here.

The Leaders Who Get It Right

Now, let’s flip the script.

What do the most respected leaders have in common? What makes certain politicians, CEOs, and cultural icons stand out?

They connect. They listen. They understand not just what people say—but what they mean.

Take @barackobama, for example. Whether you agreed with his politics or not, his ability to connect with people was undeniable. He made people feel seen. He understood that facts alone don’t move people—stories do. Connection does.

Or think about the brands that people love—not just tolerate. The ones that don’t just sell products, but make you feel something Nike. Patagonia. They don’t just talk at you. They get you.

That’s not an accident. That’s empathy.

So, What Do We Do?

If we want a world where leadership actually serves people, where businesses actually understand customers, where conversations actually bring us closer instead of pushing us apart, we need to stop treating empathy like a footnote.

Here’s how:

  1. Redefine Strength. Being “tough” doesn’t mean ignoring emotions. It means understanding them—and making decisions with that understanding in mind.
  2. Make Listening the First Step, Not the Last. Before leaders make policies, before businesses launch products, before we hit “send” on that email—pause. Listen first. Because the best decisions come from understanding, not assumptions.
  3. Reward Connection. Right now, we measure success by profits, efficiency, and speed. But what if we also measured how well we connect? What if we valued emotional intelligence as much as technical skills?

The Bottom Line

Empathy isn’t optional. It’s not a side note. It’s the foundation of everything that works in society.

Great leaders? Empathy.
Great businesses? Empathy.
Great relationships, great movements, great change? It all starts with one thing: the ability to understand and care about someone who isn’t you.

So let’s stop treating empathy like an afterthought. Let’s stop acting like logic and emotion are enemies. Because if we really want to move forward—not just efficiently, but meaningfully—we need to start putting empathy back where it belongs: at the center of everything we do.

Because progress isn’t just about moving forward. It’s about moving forward together.

Imagine a world where every thought, every desire, and every aspiration you’ve ever had was subtly planted in your mind—not by friends, family, or personal experience, but by carefully crafted advertisements you’ve been exposed to since birth. What if your concept of happiness, beauty, or success wasn’t truly your own? This is the world we live in, and the consequences are profound.

Image from free pic

The Unseen Influence: How Ads Build Our Baseline Desires

By the time the average person turns 18, they’ve seen over 2 million advertisements. These aren’t just fleeting images; they’re a systematic programming of our desires and beliefs. Advertising doesn’t just sell products; it sells ideals, aspirations, and a vision of how life “should” be.

For example, consider the iconic Coca-Cola holiday ads. They don’t just promote a beverage; they equate drinking Coke with the joy and magic of the holiday season. Repeated exposure to such messaging subtly shifts our emotional connection to brands, associating them with life’s most meaningful moments. Over time, these narratives construct a baseline—a mental framework of what “normal” looks like.

The Hijacking of Identity and Individuality

One of advertising’s most insidious effects is how it co-opts individuality. In a world where self-expression is commodified, choices that feel personal often stem from a menu of pre-packaged options.

Take fashion, for instance. Global campaigns by brands like Nike or Gucci promise uniqueness, yet their mass appeal ensures conformity within narrowly defined boundaries.

A study by the American Psychological Association found that materialism, fueled by advertising, correlates with lower self-esteem and higher levels of anxiety. This creates a paradox: while ads promise individuality and fulfillment, they often homogenize desires, ensuring we’re all striving for a “unique” ideal that millions of others share.

Normalizing Consumerism: The Birth of Eternal Dissatisfaction

By normalizing a culture of consumption, advertisements perpetuate a cycle of perpetual dissatisfaction. Every product promises a solution to a problem you didn’t know you had.

For example, beauty ads often highlight perceived flaws—wrinkles, acne, or dull skin—that require their products to fix. This strategy keeps fulfillment always just one purchase away.

A striking example is the rise of fast fashion. Brands like Zara and H&M churn out trends at breakneck speed, convincing consumers that last month’s clothing is outdated. This has not only environmental consequences but also psychological ones, fostering a mindset where nothing is ever enough.

The Algorithmic Amplification

In the digital age, advertising’s impact has intensified exponentially. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok use algorithms to deliver hyper-targeted ads, exploiting individual vulnerabilities and these tailored messages are far more effective than traditional methods.

Consider the rise of influencer marketing.

When a celebrity or influencer seamlessly integrates a product into their content, the line between authenticity and advertisement blurs. For young minds, this constant exposure creates a distorted sense of reality, where curated perfection becomes the norm.

Can We Break Free?

Understanding the cumulative psychological impact of advertising is the first step toward reclaiming our autonomy. Awareness allows us to question our desires: “Do I really want this, or have I been taught to want it?” It’s a question that can feel unsettling but is essential in untangling personal identity from corporate influence.

One actionable step is fostering media literacy. Teaching children and adults to analyze advertisements critically can empower them to recognize manipulative tactics. For instance, breaking down how ads use colours, emotions, and scarcity to create urgency can demystify their power. Governments and schools should also prioritize stricter regulations and educational programs to reduce the early and pervasive impact of ads.

As we navigate an era of algorithm-driven advertising, the stakes have never been higher

Advertisements don’t just shape what we buy; they shape who we are. They redefine what we consider beautiful, successful, and worthy—often without our conscious consent. By understanding and addressing this cumulative impact, we can begin to dismantle the hidden architecture of desire and reclaim the freedom to define our own values.

The question we must ask ourselves is this: Are we making choices that reflect our true selves, or are we merely acting on impulses carefully cultivated by an industry that profits from our longing? The answer holds the key to a more authentic and fulfilling existence.

Have you ever realized how deeply an advertisement influenced your choices?

Share your story!

Page 4 of 25
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 25