Info

Posts tagged marketing

Choose another tag?

Two years ago, marketers used ChatGPT to draft blog posts.
Today, those who kept up are using AI to rebuild their entire marketing departments.

The shift is deeper than most realize.
We’re not just automating tasks.
We’re replacing entire teams with in-house AI agents.

And most agencies?
They won’t survive it.

The Hidden Transformation

Most small businesses are still stuck in 2023.
They think AI means asking ChatGPT for content ideas.
They don’t see what’s really happening.

But the smartest brands already do.

They don’t outsource anymore.
They build internal systems powered by custom GPTs and Gemini agents.
AI workflows that replicate the core functions of a digital agency—only faster, cheaper, and more aligned to the brand.

This isn’t a theory. It’s live.

The In-House Revolution

Here’s how it works.

Smart businesses now set up:

  • A brand-trained content engine that writes SEO-rich posts, links properly, and follows brand tone.
  • An internal brand assistant that remembers every meeting, every product detail, every customer persona.
  • A PR strategist that drafts releases and finds outreach targets.
  • A design agent that adapts templates to new offers and launches.
  • A media buyer that helps test and optimize ads.

Each of these is an AI.
Each one improves over time.
Each one lives inside the business.

So instead of paying $10,000 a month to an agency, they pay a few hundred for intelligent workflows that never sleep, forget, or outsource your voice.

The Future of Marketing Is Internal

Let’s break it down.

If you’re a business with under $2,000/month to spend on marketing
You’ll use software that does everything in-house.
Blog posts. Ads. Funnels. Designs. Email. All done instantly with your data and tone.

If you’re spending $2,000–$20,000/month
You won’t hire an agency.
You’ll hire an AI architect to build systems tailored to your brand.
One-time setup, continuous payoff.

Only if you’re spending over $50,000/month
Will it still make sense to bring in elite humans.
The visionaries. The top-tier creatives.
Even then, they’ll work with your AI stack—not in place of it.

Why Digital Agencies Will Vanish

This is the part people don’t want to hear:

Most digital marketing agencies will go extinct.

Not because marketing dies.
But because the need to outsource it dies.

Small and medium businesses will realize they don’t need external teams when internal systems do a better job.

And once that realization hits, it’s over.

Agencies that don’t evolve will fade.
The few that survive will become AI consultants, builders, or strategic partners—no longer execution factories.

The Only Thing AI Can’t Replace

What still matters?

Judgment.
Insight.
Taste.

The ability to ask the right question.
To find the right story.
To decide what not to do.

Everything else—copy, design, ads, funnels—is systematized and scalable.

Your only competitive edge will be your mind.

By 2027, marketing won’t be something you outsource.


It will be something you run internally, powered by your own intelligent agents.

Businesses that realize this will move faster, grow leaner, and make better decisions.

Those that don’t?
They’ll keep paying bloated retainers for work AI could have done better in seconds.

The age of digital agencies is ending.
Not because they failed.
But because they’re no longer necessary.

images via @freepic

Why Weak Thinking Is Starving Creativity

A strange thing is happening in adland.

Budgets are holding. Tools are multiplying. Content is everywhere.
And yet—campaigns are feeling flatter, safer, forgettable.
We’re showing up more. But saying less.

According to Lions’ State of Creativity 2025 report, we now know why:

51% of brands say their insights are too weak to fuel bold creativity.

The very oxygen of original work—insight—is running low.

Creativity Isn’t Dead. It’s Malnourished.

The study surveyed 1,000 marketers and creatives globally.
Only 13% said they were “very good” at developing high-quality insights.
And over half admitted their strategic thinking wasn’t strong enough to support brave ideas.

This isn’t about copy or color palettes.
It’s about the starting point—the thinking beneath the campaign.

When that’s soft, everything collapses.
We don’t create culture. We decorate it.

The Great Disconnect

Here’s where it gets messier.

26% of brands believe they’re good at generating insights.
Only 10% of agencies agree.

That’s not a disagreement. That’s a misalignment.
And it shows up in the work: campaigns with zero tension, zero edge, and zero memory.

It’s a quiet crisis—because no one gets fired for playing it safe.
But no one gets remembered for it, either.

Why This Is Happening

The report points to three key reasons:

  1. No one agrees on what a “good insight” actually is.
    29% of agencies said the core problem is not knowing how to define it.
  2. Insight development isn’t prioritized.
    It’s not funded. It’s not briefed. It’s not protected.
    (But production timelines? Always urgent.)
  3. Brands struggle to react to culture in real time.
    57% said they can’t respond fast enough to cultural moments.
    Insight, by the time it surfaces, is already stale.

As one respondent put it:

“Capturing cultural moments requires real-time data and courage. But fear of failure gets in the way.”

What Insight Isn’t

  • It’s not a stat.
  • Not a demographic.
  • Not “Millennials love experiences.”
  • Not pulled from a deck last year and recycled today.

Insight is friction. It’s clarity on a human truth your category hasn’t touched yet.
It’s the gut-punch behind the campaign—not the headline.

Without it, the work may look good.
But it won’t feel anything.

What This Means for Brands

If creativity is how we stand out, insight is how we break in.
Into minds. Into culture. Into relevance.

Without it, your ad becomes wallpaper.
With it, your ad becomes signal.

And right now, in an industry that can generate 10,000 versions of an idea with AI in under a minute,insight is the last unfair advantage.

This isn’t a creativity crisis. It’s a thinking one.

We’ve never had more tools, more channels, more data—
and yet, we keep mistaking noise for impact.

Without real insight, we’re just adding color to the void.
Insight is what gives a campaign a spine, a soul, and a shot at mattering.
Without it, we’re not communicating—we’re just performing.

And in a world flooded with content,
only the brands that see deeper will ever be seen at all.

Ad spend is falling. Only what proves ROI will survive.

Let’s start with the headline stat:
📉 54% of marketers worldwide plan to cut ad budgets in 2025.
📉 In Europe, it’s even worse—60%.

This isn’t a trend.
This is a reset.

And in a world where money is tight, there’s one new rule:

No proof, no budget.

Why It’s Happening

According to Nielsen’s 2025 Annual Marketing Report, marketers are reacting to:

  • Economic uncertainty
  • Supply chain instability
  • Sluggish consumer demand
  • Pressure from the CFO to cut anything that isn’t measurable

The result?
Marketing teams are being told:
👉 “Do more with less.”
👉 “Show me it worked, or don’t do it again.”

What It Means for You

Here’s how the landscape is shifting:

✅ What Stays❌ What Gets Cut
Digital with clear metricsBrand campaigns with no follow-up
Performance marketingAwareness-only TV buys
Retail Media Networks (RMNs)“Spray and pray” display ads
Connected TV with targetingVanity metrics (reach, impressions)
Tools that show ROITactics you can’t track

The Big Takeaway: ROI or Die

Nielsen found that 60% of marketers globally now prioritize return on investment—not just reach or awareness.
And guess what?
Most marketers still can’t measure their full campaigns properly.

Only 32% measure digital and traditional media together.
In Europe, it’s even lower—just 23%.

That means most brands are spending blind.

So What’s Working?

📈 Connected TV (CTV):
56% of marketers plan to increase spending here—it’s digital, trackable, and can replace expensive TV spots.

📈 Retail Media Networks (RMNs):
Think Amazon, Walmart, Uber, or even big travel apps. They offer closed-loop measurement—you can see exactly who saw your ad and bought your product. That’s budget gold.

📈 AI-powered campaigns:
Marketers love it for speed, personalization, and media optimization.
(And yes, it’s cheaper than hiring 5 analysts.)

What to Do Now

You don’t need to panic.
You need to prove.

Here’s your 3-part playbook:

1. Only run what you can measure.

Every campaign should show how it impacts revenue, conversions, or growth.

2. Switch to ROI-first channels.

If you can’t show what worked—on paper—it’s a risk.
CTV, retail media, search, and email are safer bets than brand ads with no call to action.

3. Bring finance into marketing.

Treat your campaigns like investments.
Every dollar spent should have a thesis, a goal, and a post-mortem.

This Isn’t Budget Cuts. It’s Budget Evolution.

You’re not losing money.
You’re losing unaccountable spending.

From now on, your best campaign isn’t your most creative.
It’s the one that comes with a receipt.

How the pitch deck went synthetic—and why your pricing model is next.

1. A Quiet Revolution in the War Room

According to Business Insider, top agencies are no longer pitching with just moodboards and mad men.
They’re pitching with:

  • Midjourney visuals
  • AI-voiced scripts via ElevenLabs
  • AI-written concepts from ChatGPT

And here’s the twist: they’re winning.
Not because the ideas are better. But because they’re faster, cheaper, and more polished in less time.

The creative work didn’t die.
It just got automated—and upgraded.

2. Altman’s Warning Wasn’t Wrong. It Was Understated.

When Sam Altman said, “AI will replace 95% of marketing jobs,” people scoffed.
But read closer: he wasn’t predicting mass unemployment.
He was pointing at the automation of everything repetitive, templated, and slow.

He wasn’t warning marketers.
He was warning their business model.

3. What’s Actually Collapsing?

Not talent. Not creativity.
What’s collapsing is how we charge for it.

YesterdayToday
Billable hoursUnlimited iterations via AI
Manual productionAutomated asset generation
Big teamsSmall teams + AI + IP

If you make money by selling time, you’re already behind.
AI doesn’t need time.
It generates volume instantly and variation endlessly.

4. What Clients Are Really Paying For Now

You can’t charge for what machines do better.
You can charge for what machines can’t replicate:

  • Original strategy frameworks
  • Taste + cultural intuition
  • Brand-defining strategy
  • IP assets (reusable, ownable systems)
  • Proprietary data and decision engines

This is what Altman means by strategic leverage—not just prompts, but power structures built on IP.

5. Agencies Must Stop Selling Output. Start Selling Ownership.

Here’s where everything changes:

Old ModelNew Model
“We made this campaign”“We built this reusable system”
“We charged for time”“We license our IP”
“We delivered one solution”“We created frameworks you own”

Instead of pitching one-off ideas, agencies must build platforms, not presentations.

Example:
One AI-generated brand voice tool → licensed to 10 clients → €10K/month each.
No team burnout. No time tracking. Just scale.

6. So What Now?

Agencies that survive this shift will:

  1. Build proprietary AI workflows
  2. Own their own data and frameworks
  3. License thinking, not hours
  4. Price for access, not output

The future is fewer meetings, more models.
Fewer revisions, more royalties.

AI didn’t kill the creative industry.
It will force it to grow up.

From time-based billing to value-based ownership.
From pitching ideas to monetizing intelligence.

As Altman warned, the machines are coming.
But the smart ones?
They’re not just automating work.
They’re rewriting the invoice.

Because profit lives in your self-loathing. If you ever felt enough, you’d stop buying.
Based on Vogue Business: “Future Beauty Standards Are Extreme—How Should Marketing Respond?”

You were never meant to feel beautiful. Just almost.

Almost confident. Almost worthy. Almost enough.
Enough to chase—but never enough to arrive.

That’s not a flaw in the system.
That is the system.

And now, it’s automated.

THE NEW GOD IS THE FEED

As Vogue Business reports, beauty’s future is extreme—driven by AI, injectables, gene-editing, and weight-loss drugs like Ozempic. But this isn’t evolution. It’s aesthetic escalation. Your face is no longer personal—it’s programmatic.

TikTok and Instagram don’t mirror your taste. They install it.
Every swipe is a biometric confession. Every filter is a blueprint for your next insecurity.

The algorithm isn’t reflecting your desires.
It’s writing them.

Your “ideal self” isn’t who you dream of being—it’s who the feed can monetize.

FLAW IS THE FUEL

The beauty economy doesn’t run on confidence.
It runs on calibrated self-hate.

Not devastation—just dissatisfaction.
A subtle ache. A glitch in the mirror.

That’s the zone where profit lives.
Because if you ever felt enough, you’d stop scrolling, stop purchasing, stop complying.

Instead, you’re served a feed of almosts:

  • Almost natural.
  • Almost achievable.
  • Almost real.

Every ad says the same thing:
You’re one product away from permission to exist.

SKIN AS STATUS, FACE AS FILTER

We’ve entered the era of face capitalism.

Vogue notes how skin quality is becoming the new class divide. Not what you wear—what you’re made of.
You are now your texture, tone, symmetry, inflammation score. There’s no fashion to change. Just flesh to optimize.

And optimization is infinite.

DNA-personalized skincare. AI dermatology. Injectable “tweakments” that promise improvement without identity.
Even your rebellion—your bare face, your stretch marks—has been made into a monetizable aesthetic.

This isn’t self-care.
It’s cosmetic compliance.

BEAUTY ISN’T PERSONAL—IT’S POLITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Vogue surveys over 600 consumers and uncovers a split:
Some dream of more natural, inclusive beauty.
Others sense the trap—ideals are not widening. They’re mutating.

Not just unachievable—unhuman.

Beauty is no longer a preference.
It’s a passport.

Don’t fit the aesthetic protocol?
Fewer likes. No virality. No matches.
No visibility.

The algorithm doesn’t hate you.
It just can’t process your kind of face.

DESIRE HAS BEEN OUTSOURCED

You used to know what you liked.
Now you wait for the algorithm to tell you.

You don’t want to look beautiful.
You want to look machine-readable.

This is the real horror:
The homogenization of attraction.
The standardization of seduction.
The death of human taste.

You’ve been trained to crave conformity—and call it empowerment.

REBELLION IS A SYSTEM ERROR

Vogue is right to ask how marketing should respond.
But the better question is:
How do we burn the script?

Because self-love, as it’s sold now, is just a better brand of bondage.
Even your resistance—“authentic,” “natural,” “unfiltered”—has been co-opted.

Rebellion isn’t a new product.
It’s a refusal.

So here’s the resistance:

  • Keep the wrinkle.
  • Let the filter glitch.
  • Post the photo that doesn’t perform.
  • Love your face like it’s not a platform.

Because if you ever truly felt enough…
The entire economy of insecurity would collapse.

And they can’t afford that.

How our smallest choices fund the biggest systems — whether we mean to or not.

Most people don’t feel powerful.

The news is overwhelming. The system seems rigged.
So we turn to the familiar:
A coffee on the go. A deal online. Something fast, easy, on sale.

It feels harmless.
But here’s the truth: Every purchase is a vote.

Not a metaphor. A literal endorsement.

When you buy something, you’re saying:

“More of this, please.”

More of how it was made.
More of who made it.
More of what it leads to.

The Quiet Cost of Everyday Things

You don’t need to be evil to fund harm.
You just need to keep clicking without thinking.

No villain.
Just systems. And sleepwalkers.

“It’s Just One Thing”

Sure.
And you’re just one person.

But that’s exactly how this works:
Millions of “just one thing” decisions, repeated daily, on autopilot.

That’s how harm becomes normal.

The System Doesn’t Care What You Say

You say you care about the environment.
Or ethics. Or fairness.

But the system only tracks your behavior — not your beliefs.
The algorithm doesn’t care what you post. It cares what you click, watch, buy.

Your cart is louder than your values.
And what you fund, you fuel.

This Isn’t About Guilt. It’s About Power.

You don’t have to be perfect. No one is.
But you can be conscious.

Because every item you buy is a story — and when you pay for it, you’re signing your name to it.

So ask:

  • Would I still want this if I knew how it was made?
  • Do I believe in what this company stands for?
  • Is this helping build a world I’d want to live in?

One honest answer can shift everything.

Change Doesn’t Start with Protest. It Starts with Pause.

You don’t need to go off-grid.
You just need to stop sleepwalking.

Buy less, but buy real.
Support businesses that align with your values.
Ask why before what.

Small shifts in millions of people — that’s how systems crack.

The Bottom Line

You vote more with your wallet than with any ballot. In fact you vote with it daily and whether you realize it or not, you’re shaping the future.

So next time you buy something, ask:

“Is this a vote I’m proud of?”

Jaguar’s failed rebrand reveals more than bad creative. It exposes the cowardice of brand leadership.

Jaguar’s latest campaign said, “Copy Nothing.”
But what they launched copied one thing perfectly: the corporate tradition of blaming the agency when leadership gets it wrong.

No cars. No curves. No roar.
Just abstract visuals, minimalist slogans, and a branding exercise so out of touch, even Elon Musk publicly mocked it. The campaign was lambasted as empty, confusing, and emotionally tone-deaf. A luxury car brand… that showed no cars.

The public hated it.
Critics laughed at it.
And @Jaguar?
They fired the ad agency.

But here’s the real story: Who briefed the agency? Who approved the decks? Who nodded in the boardroom and said, “Yes, let’s hide the cars”?

The creatives didn’t conjure this campaign in a vacuum. Someone paid for it, approved it, championed it.

That someone is still sitting in Jaguar’s leadership.

The Real Problem: Vision Without Accountability

This isn’t about a bad campaign. This is about a broken model—one where agencies are hired as scapegoats, not strategic partners.

In today’s brand world, storytelling is strategy. The brief is the vision. If that vision is flawed, no amount of creative genius can salvage it. You can’t out-art direct a confused identity.

And Jaguar’s identity right now? A luxury brand sprinting toward electric futurism while ghosting its legacy, its product, and its soul.

What did they expect the agency to do—turn vapor into velocity?

When the Brief Is Rotten, the Brand Fails

Let’s be clear: agencies aren’t perfect. But they don’t control the product, the pricing, or the internal politics. They don’t choose whether the car appears in the campaign. That comes from the client.

We’ve seen this before:

Agencies don’t greenlight madness. They’re handed it.

The Cowardice of Creative Blame

What we’re watching isn’t just a brand misstep. It’s a case study in corporate cowardice. A company trying to reinvent itself—without the courage to own its decisions.

The truth? Jaguar’s problem isn’t the ad agency. It’s that the people steering the ship don’t know what destination they’re heading toward—so they blame the compass when they get lost.

A New Standard for Brand Leadership

We need to stop letting executives escape through the back door while their agencies are thrown under the bus.

If you brief it, own it. If you approve it, stand by it. If you kill it, don’t outsource the executioner.

Because marketing isn’t a magic trick. It’s an expression of vision. And when a rebrand collapses, it’s not the messenger who failed—it’s the strategist who didn’t know what they stood for.

Final Words:

If the story sucks, don’t shoot the storyteller.
Fire the author.

Page 1 of 16
1 2 3 … 16