Info

Posts from the all other stuff Category

Choose another category?

In today’s Europe, the most powerful protest doesn’t always happen on the streets. It happens at the checkout counter.

A quiet revolution is unfolding in fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG). While most headlines focus on political elections or street demonstrations, the real shift is happening in everyday transactions. Consumers are no longer just buyers—they’re participants in a decentralized, daily form of activism.

YouGov’s latest European shopper research confirms it: price fairness, political sentiment, and brand origin are now driving purchase behavior across Europe in ways brands are failing to track, let alone respond to.

Consumer Trust Is Collapsing—and It’s Hitting the Shelf

According to YouGov’s Spring 2025 Behavior Change study, 70% of Europeans say they are worried about global political and economic instability. That’s not a mood—it’s a market signal.

Add to that YouGov’s EuroTrack data showing falling government approval ratings, and a clear picture emerges: as public trust in institutions erodes, people redirect their control to what they can influence—their purchases.

This isn’t abstract. It’s visible in cart data, loyalty drop-offs, and brand health declines.

Shopper Activism Is Not Loud. It’s Consistent.

The YouGov study maps out how activism plays out differently across Europe. Four shopper types are emerging:

  1. The Boycotter – Avoids products based on political origin (Nordics, Ukraine).
  2. The Buycotter – Intentionally supports national or local brands (Romania, Bulgaria).
  3. The Inflation Rebel – Reacts to price increases with long-term disloyalty (Serbia).
  4. The Emotional Shifter – Changes brand perception based on broader global sentiment (Denmark).

Each group expresses dissatisfaction differently, but they all operate with a shared logic: “My money has a message.”

Serbia: The Cost of Ignoring Frustration

In Serbia, a boycott sparked by perceived price-fixing led to a 35% drop in footfall at targeted retailers. Market share dropped from 46% to 35% in just one day, according to YouGov’s local panel.

While the initial impact was dramatic, follow-up efforts had less effect—likely because shoppers had limited alternatives. But this doesn’t mean the threat is gone. It shows that once the frustration is voiced, expectations shift. Retailers who respond late are already behind.

Denmark: Sentiment Over Supply

In Denmark, sentiment—not product quality—is driving brand value. With 92% holding an unfavorable view of Donald Trump and 36% likely to boycott based on country of origin, U.S. FMCG brands are seeing sharp consequences.

YouGov BrandIndex shows two major U.S. brands lost over 20% of their market value in Q1 2025, while a Danish competitor gained +330%, powered by a campaign that emphasized Danish roots and values.

Consumers didn’t just change products. They switched stories.

The Role of Localism and Identity

In Romania and Bulgaria, over two-thirds of consumers prefer local or national brands. Not because of political sentiment, but because they trust what they can trace.

In Germany and France, “locally produced” ranks above “national brand” in importance—highlighting a shift from emotional nationalism to practical proximity.

Retailers like Denmark’s Salling Group are adapting fast, using visual labeling systems (e.g., star-shaped icons) to help shoppers identify European-made products instantly.

Price Is No Longer Just Economics—It’s Ethics

The most underestimated insight from YouGov’s data is that price fairness is now a trigger for rebellion.

Consumers are not just looking for low prices. They are actively punishing brands they believe are manipulating pricing, inflating costs unjustifiably, or capitalizing on crisis.

This is the rise of the Inflation Rebel—a consumer who may not march or tweet, but who silently shifts loyalty, tells friends, and never comes back. They don’t write angry reviews. They just delete the brand from their wallet.

Strategic Implications for FMCG Brands

Most FMCG companies are still thinking in terms of cost and convenience. That’s no longer enough. In this climate, every product must pass four silent tests:

  1. Is this brand politically neutral—or politically problematic?
  2. Is this price fair—or opportunistic?
  3. Is this product local—or foreign in a tense climate?
  4. Is this brand acting transparently—or hiding behind marketing?

If your brand fails even one, you’re at risk.

What Comes Next

For brands:

  • US brands need immediate perception repair strategies—transparency, pricing clarity, and local partnerships can help.
  • European brands should double down on heritage, supply chain transparency, and shared values.
  • Retailers must make values visible—through signage, labeling, and curated shelves.

For strategists and marketers:
Stop treating price as a promotional lever. Start treating it as a trust signal. The emotional weight of pricing is heavier now than any time in the last decade.

Final Thought

This isn’t just a consumer trend. It’s a shift in economic behavior that blends politics, identity, and purchasing in ways that make brand strategy more complex—and more important—than ever.

The brands that win in this era will be the ones that read the room before they read the receipts.

Because in 2025, shoppers aren’t just buying products. They’re casting votes. And brands are on the ballot.

Inside the Digital Illusions of the Iran–Israel War

We’re not watching a war. We’re watching a screenplay produced by empires, edited by AI, and sold as reality.

In June 2025, a now-viral image of Tel Aviv being obliterated by a swarm of missiles flooded social media. It looked real—devastating, cinematic, urgent.

But it was fake.
According to BBC Verify journalist Shayan Sardarizadeh  , the image was AI-generated. And yet, it ricocheted across the internet, amassing millions of impressions before truth had a chance to catch up.
A second video claiming to show the aftermath of Iranian strikes on Israel was traced back to footage from entirely different conflicts. It was, quite literally, yesterday’s war dressed in today’s fear.

This is the battlefield now:
Not just land. Not just air.
But perception.

How the West Writes the Script

While both sides—Iran and Israel—have weaponized visuals and emotion, the West plays a more insidious role. Its manipulation wears a tie.

In The Guardian, Nesrine Malik writes that Western leaders offer calls for “diplomacy” without ever addressing the root causes. Israel’s strikes are framed as “deterrence.” Iran’s retaliation is “aggression.” Civilian suffering is background noise.

Even so-called restraint is scripted.
Reuters reported that Britain, France, and Germany urged Iran to return to negotiations—yet all three simultaneously approved arms shipments to Israel.
Their message is not peace.
It’s obedience dressed as diplomacy. Basically, they are hypocrites

Meanwhile, editorials like this one in Time express “grave alarm” at escalating tensions. But they stop short of condemning the architects of escalation. The West has a talent for watching wars it helped create—then gasping at the fire.

Not Just States—Extremists Are Watching Too

This conflict is not unfolding in a vacuum.
ISIS, through its al-Naba publication, is framing both Iran and Israel as enemies of true Islam—using the chaos to stoke hatred, attract followers, and promise vengeance.
They don’t need to fire a shot.
They just wait for our illusions to do the work.

Truth Isn’t the First Casualty—It’s the Target

So what happens when truth is no longer collateral damage, but the goal of destruction?

– A missile hits, and we ask not where, but which version.
– A death toll rises, and we wonder: is it verified? real? current?
– Leaders speak of peace while voting for war behind closed doors.

In this fog, apathy becomes defense. Confusion becomes allegiance.
And war becomes a franchise—a story you consume with your morning scroll.

How to Reclaim Your Mind

  • Verify before you amplify: Use tools like reverse image search, metadata extractors, and independent fact-checkers like AFP and BBC Verify. Search multiple sources.
  • Ask who benefits from the narrative you’re being sold.
  • Notice omissions: If Gaza disappears from the map while Tel Aviv gets front-page coverage, ask why.
  • Resist false binaries: You can oppose both regimes and still demand truth.

We live in mad mad world

You don’t have to pick a side.
You don’t have to parrot the scripts of Tehran or Tel Aviv.
But you do have to stay awake.

Because if they steal your attention…
They’ve already won.

Anna Haifisch via

Why Agencies Must Stop Selling AI Videos to Brands That Can Afford Humans

There’s something off in the air lately.
You feel it too, right?

AI is everywhere. In our workflows. In our brainstorms. Now in our videos.
But the problem isn’t the tool.

It’s who’s using it—and why.

The wealthiest brands on Earth…

…are now cutting costs on creativity.
Not because they have to.
Because they can.

Multinationals. Banks. Telcos. Luxury giants.
All of them have the money to hire real directors. Real actors. Real crews.

Instead, they’re asking for AI-generated everything.
Because it’s faster. Cheaper. Cleaner. No egos. No union hours. No mess.

But here’s the cost no one’s talking about:

Every time a mega-brand uses AI to replace a human creator, a door quietly closes somewhere in our industry.

AI was supposed to level the playing field.

Instead, it’s being used to bulldoze the little guys.

For years, small businesses, NGOs, and startups couldn’t afford high-end production.
Now, with AI tools, they finally have access to the big leagues.

That’s a good thing. That’s progress.
But when global corporations with billion-dollar budgets start using the same shortcuts?

It’s not innovation.
It’s exploitation.

It’s like the CEO showing up at the food bank.

Agencies, we need to draw a line.

What if we made a pact?
Not a legal one—a moral one.

What if WPP, Omnicom, Publicis, IPG, Dentsu, and Havas could all agree on this. We do not sell AI video production to clients who can afford to pay humans.

Simple as that.

If you’re a major brand, you want a campaign?
Great. Hire a team. Book a studio. Feed the industry you profit from.

Save the AI shortcuts for those who truly need them.
Not for the top 1% to make even more with even less.

What we risk losing is more than jobs.

We lose mentorship.
We lose artistry.
We lose nuance.
We lose culture made by people, not pattern-matching algorithms.

And worst of all?
We normalize the idea that creativity is disposable.

That human input is optional.
That good enough is good enough—as long as it’s cheap.

This isn’t about being anti-AI.

It’s about being pro-choice—for creators, for clients, for culture.

AI can be a tool for empowerment.
But only if we choose to wield it with conscience.

The rich don’t need help making things faster and cheaper.
The rest of us do.

So to every agency out there:

Let the giants pay.

Let the small rise.

Let’s build a future where AI helps the underfunded create—
not helps the overfunded extract.

When a missile falls, something more dangerous than buildings collapses:
your ability to feel.

War doesn’t need your consent.
It just needs your attention.
Your feed.
Your outrage.
Your distraction.

Because when your screen lights up with fire and you instinctively pick a side—
you’ve already lost.
Not your life.
But your clarity.
Your sovereignty.
Your humanity.

You Think You’re Watching War. You’re Watching Theater.

Understand this:
You’re not watching history unfold.
You’re watching a script play out—
funded by arms deals, stabilized by media narratives,
and performed by governments who don’t bleed and don’t really care about people

“Justifiable violence” is the most dangerous oxymoron of the 21st century.

Iran. Israel. Ukraine. Taiwan. Gaza. Russsia
Different stage. Same director.
They light the match.
We argue over who struck it.

Who Profits When You Pick a Side?

Let me ask you something brutal:

What if your “solidarity” is just another gear in the machine?
What if your flags, hashtags, and tribal takes
aren’t signs of justice—
but proof that the hypnosis is working?

The people killing each other are not the ones who ordered the war.
They’re the ones convinced it was necessary.

Every time you reduce a human to a symbol—
you feed the fire.
You stop being a witness.
You become a weapon.

IThis Isn’t About Iran. It’s About You.

You don’t need to live near the blast zone to be a casualty.
If you’ve stopped questioning,
if you’ve stopped grieving,
if you’ve memorized the headlines but forgotten the faces—
you’re already infected.

Because the real bomb is empathy collapse.
The real war is fought inside your ability to care
without condition,
without nationalism,
without needing to be “right.”

They Don’t Fear Nukes. They Fear We’ll Wake Up Together.

You want to know why the machine keeps manufacturing enemies?

Because if the Israeli mother and the Iranian father
ever look at each other and say:
“This isn’t our war”—
the whole game ends.

They can’t allow that.
So they keep us busy.
Fighting over semantics.
Consuming curated horror.
Begging for peace from the architects of violence.

Who Are You When the Missiles Fall?

Are you a spectator?
A soldier of narrative?
A well-fed ghost?

Or are you something else entirely?

Are you the whisper that breaks the spell?
The one who says: “No. I will not become machinery. I will not perform the play.”

Because the most radical act right now
isn’t protest.
It’s perception.
It’s learning to see beyond the script.

There Is No Foreign War Anymore

Every missile is local.
Every dead child is your child.
Every collapsed apartment could’ve been your home
if you were born 200km east.

If your compassion has borders,
your conscience is under occupation.

This Ends When We Say: Enough.

Enough ritual bloodletting for politics. Enough to politicians acting like kings
Enough weaponized narratives.
Enough performance warfare dressed as moral duty.

This ends when we rehumanize the “enemy.”
This ends when we unhook our empathy from identity.
This ends when we refuse to choose sides
in a war none of us truly asked for.

Because there is no side left to choose.
Only this:

We either remember that we belong to each other—
or we burn, divided, while the gods of war count their gold.

In North America, Europe, and beyond, consumers are steering their wallets through churn and unease. This isn’t a crisis—it’s a pivot point. Brands that act with empathy, clarity, and substance will not just survive—they’ll thrive.

🇨🇦🇺🇸 What Canada and the US Reveal

A fresh report from FCB and Angus Reid reveals:

  • 50% of Canadians and Americans are insecure about jobs
  • Over half cite tariffs affecting their ability to pay for essentials
  • 90% fear rising living costs
  • Corporate trust is brittle—over half of Canadians feel disengaged or pessimistic
  • A massive shift in loyalty is emerging: 78% of Canadians plan to buy more Canadian-made products; 59% plan to boycott US brands

Canadians are finding real meaning in local sourcing—not just patriotism. They want proof: origin, ownership, authenticity.

🇪🇺 What’s Happening in Europe

Europe mirrors the sentiment, even amid regional variation:

  • BCG found 54% of consumers in nine EU countries are pessimistic about their national economies, up 7 points since mid‑2024
  • 52% worry daily about personal finances
  • Germany’s GfK index hit a low of −24.7 in March 2025; 62% view their economy negatively; nearly two-thirds fear political instability; 70% dread future price hikes
  • In southern Europe (France, Spain, Italy), concerns extend to politics (57%) and environment
  • Yet pockets of optimism exist: Spain saw rising discretionary spending and higher Gen Z interest in down‑trading

The EU’s flash consumer confidence edged up in May 2025, but remains well below average (−14.5)

What This Means for Brands

  1. Consumers want more than deals
    Savings help—but brands must deliver meaning, agency, and emotional security. Canadians don’t just want low prices—they want brands that stand for them. Europeans aren’t just trading down—they want value aligned with values.
  2. Local is credibility
    “Buy Canadian” isn’t nostalgia—it’s a trust signal. In Europe, private labels are rising as confidence sags
  3. Trust trumps loyalty
    Consumers are demanding transparency in origin, supply chains, ownership, and purpose. Surface-level patriotism no longer cuts it.
  4. Brands as civic actors
    Where governments falter, brands can step in—offering stability, practical support, tangible impact. But it must be authentic, purposeful, and sustained.

Brands must recalibrate across three vectors:

AxisNorth AmericaEurope
Economic anxiety90% fear rising living costs54% pessimistic about national economy
Civic/political worryDisengagement and distrust rampant62% Germans pessimistic; 57% across politics/environment
Local vs global78% Canadians buying domesticPrivate‑label surge across EU markets

Strategy must:

  • Acknowledge the stress—don’t sidestep it
  • Offer honest value—not just promotions
  • Demonstrate accountability—be seen, source clearly, support communities

Consumers are navigating storms.

Consumers are navigating storms. Their wallets and spirits are under pressure. They’re not just shopping—they’re seeking solidarity. Brands that act like citizens—not just companies—will flourish. Those that cling to outdated playbooks will fall behind.

Page 22 of 3615
1 … 20 21 22 23 24 … 3,615