Info

Posts from the all other stuff Category


The Lie We Were Sold

You were told to be useful. To be productive. To be competent.

You learned the tools. You hit the targets. You optimized your LinkedIn.

And now?

You’re watching AI do in 3 seconds what took you 3 days. Clean. Fast. Tireless.

That’s not the future. That’s the present.

If your job can be done by AI, it already has.

The only question left: Can you do what it can’t?


What AI Can’t Do (Yet)

Software engineer using EEG headset translating thoughts into PC commands using brainwave signals. IT admin controlling computer functions using mind, helped by biosensor technology research

AI can write. But it can’t originate.

It can mimic style. But it can’t summon soul.

It can predict outcomes. But it can’t challenge paradigms.

The machines have mastered execution. What they lack is intention.

This is your opening.

Not to compete with AI. But to become uncopyable by it.


From Competence to Irreplaceability

AI nuclear energy, future innovation of disruptive technology

In the industrial age, being reliable made you valuable.
In the AI age, being original makes you indispensable.

AI is devouring:

  • Administrative work
  • Marketing fluff
  • Technical repetition

But it still can’t:

  • Invent new categories
  • Read unspoken tension in a room
  • Translate emotion into insight
  • Make intuitive leaps under pressure

The future belongs to people who stop trying to be impressive—and start being impossible to clone.


AI nuclear energy, future innovation of disruptive technology

How to Become Uncopyable

This isn’t about being louder. It’s about being sharper.

1. Cultivate Creative Intelligence
Not just ideas—unexpected relevance. Train your mind to fuse dots no one else sees. Be less predictable than the prompt.

2. Make Taste Your Trademark
Curation is now creation. Develop an eye for what matters, what lasts, what cuts through. Taste is the new talent.

3. Train Your Contradictions
AI is linear. You are paradox. Use it. Be the strategist and the poet. The analyst and the dissenter.

4. Build Signature Thinking
Have a POV so distinct it echoes. Write, speak, design in ways that feel like you even without your name on it.

5. Don’t Package Yourself. Pattern-Break.
Forget being “easy to understand.” Be unforgettable. Obsessively useful. Weirdly specific. Culturally surgical.


This Isn’t About AI. It’s About You.

AI didn’t steal your job. It just exposed how replaceable your skillset was.

Now you have a choice:

  • Optimize for safety, or train for distinction
  • Follow formulas, or originate frameworks
  • Be a tool user, or become a category of one

The algorithm can do everything except be you.

So make yourself worth copying—and then impossible to copy.


Be Uncopyable.

Not louder. Not faster. Just unmistakably human.

*images from freepic

Why Weak Thinking Is Starving Creativity


A strange thing is happening in adland.

Budgets are holding. Tools are multiplying. Content is everywhere.
And yet—campaigns are feeling flatter, safer, forgettable.
We’re showing up more. But saying less.

According to Lions’ State of Creativity 2025 report, we now know why:

51% of brands say their insights are too weak to fuel bold creativity.

The very oxygen of original work—insight—is running low.


Creativity Isn’t Dead. It’s Malnourished.

The study surveyed 1,000 marketers and creatives globally.
Only 13% said they were “very good” at developing high-quality insights.
And over half admitted their strategic thinking wasn’t strong enough to support brave ideas.

This isn’t about copy or color palettes.
It’s about the starting point—the thinking beneath the campaign.

When that’s soft, everything collapses.
We don’t create culture. We decorate it.


The Great Disconnect

Here’s where it gets messier.

26% of brands believe they’re good at generating insights.
Only 10% of agencies agree.

That’s not a disagreement. That’s a misalignment.
And it shows up in the work: campaigns with zero tension, zero edge, and zero memory.

It’s a quiet crisis—because no one gets fired for playing it safe.
But no one gets remembered for it, either.


Why This Is Happening

The report points to three key reasons:

  1. No one agrees on what a “good insight” actually is.
    29% of agencies said the core problem is not knowing how to define it.
  2. Insight development isn’t prioritized.
    It’s not funded. It’s not briefed. It’s not protected.
    (But production timelines? Always urgent.)
  3. Brands struggle to react to culture in real time.
    57% said they can’t respond fast enough to cultural moments.
    Insight, by the time it surfaces, is already stale.

As one respondent put it:

“Capturing cultural moments requires real-time data and courage. But fear of failure gets in the way.”


What Insight Isn’t

  • It’s not a stat.
  • Not a demographic.
  • Not “Millennials love experiences.”
  • Not pulled from a deck last year and recycled today.

Insight is friction. It’s clarity on a human truth your category hasn’t touched yet.
It’s the gut-punch behind the campaign—not the headline.

Without it, the work may look good.
But it won’t feel anything.


What This Means for Brands

If creativity is how we stand out, insight is how we break in.
Into minds. Into culture. Into relevance.

Without it, your ad becomes wallpaper.
With it, your ad becomes signal.

And right now, in an industry that can generate 10,000 versions of an idea with AI in under a minute,insight is the last unfair advantage.


This isn’t a creativity crisis. It’s a thinking one.

We’ve never had more tools, more channels, more data—
and yet, we keep mistaking noise for impact.

Without real insight, we’re just adding color to the void.
Insight is what gives a campaign a spine, a soul, and a shot at mattering.
Without it, we’re not communicating—we’re just performing.

And in a world flooded with content,
only the brands that see deeper will ever be seen at all.

“Hopefulness is adversarial. It is the warrior emotion.”
– Nick Cave

via

In spring 2025, the European Commission quietly released a truth it didn’t mean to.
Not a scandal. Not a leak. A statistic.

Only 32% of EU citizens trust their national governments.
Only 36% trust political parties.
Only 38% trust the media.
(Eurobarometer 103, Spring 2025)

And yet—people keep voting, paying, complying.
Not with conviction. With inertia.

This isn’t just a crisis of politics.
It’s a crisis of belief.


The Obedient Disbeliever

We obey because we were trained to.
Not by tyranny—but by trauma disguised as routine.

Two decades of economic collapse, viral panic, war footage, price shocks, migrant “waves,” algorithmic overload, and institutional gaslighting have rewired the average European. Not to think—but to flinch.

You were taught to “trust the process”—even when it forgets your name.
To believe the system is broken, but still sacred.
To fear chaos more than corruption.

This is not democracy.
This is cognitive containment.


The Rise of the Expert God

The same Eurobarometer reveals something else.
A new pantheon of trust:

Trust in doctors: 89%
Scientists: 86%
Universities: 84%
(Eurobarometer 103, T210–T212)

This is not accidental.
We now believe competence is safety.
But representation is danger.

Governments speak. Experts solve.
One performs. The other produces.

So we’ve begun migrating our trust—not upward to leaders, but inward to systems.
Europe doesn’t crave vision anymore.
It craves stability without ideology.

The result?
A technocracy without consent.
Power has slipped—not to the people, but to the calibrated.


Voting Inside a Loop

European Union EU Flag

“I vote, but nothing changes.”
“I protest, and nothing moves.”
“I know they’re lying. But I still do what I’m told.”

This isn’t apathy. It’s ritualized despair.
You still vote—not because you believe. But because you fear what happens if you stop.

This year, 71% of Europeans say they intend to vote in the upcoming European Parliament elections.
(Eurobarometer 103, T140)

But what are they voting for?

  • Rising cost of living is the #1 concern.
  • Migration, security, and inflation follow.
  • Climate change, once a priority, is fading from urgency in many nations.

In other words, people are not voting for the future.
They’re voting against further collapse.

This is how obedience is maintained in exhausted empires.


The Philosophy of Submission

So here’s the raw riddle:
What does it mean to obey a system you don’t believe in?

It means freedom has been reduced to a performance.
A shape you wear. A checkbox you tick.
You feel free because you can “choose”—but only from a menu designed by those you mistrust.

This is post-democracy.
Where participation is mandatory.
But transformation is off the table.

Where “truth” is not what you believe.
It’s what you’re allowed to repeat.

Where trust isn’t earned.
It’s managed, measured, manufactured.


The End of Trust, or Its Evolution?

Perhaps we’re not asleep.
Perhaps we’re evolving past the need to believe in anyone.
Past figureheads. Past slogans. Past salvation by system.

But evolution is not escape.
Unless you name it, you’re still inside it.

So here’s the final incision:

If you no longer trust the system—then who are you still obeying?

Is it fear?
Habit?
Hope?
Or is it simply this:

Obedience is easier than becoming dangerous.

Ad spend is falling. Only what proves ROI will survive.


Let’s start with the headline stat:
📉 54% of marketers worldwide plan to cut ad budgets in 2025.
📉 In Europe, it’s even worse—60%.

This isn’t a trend.
This is a reset.

And in a world where money is tight, there’s one new rule:

No proof, no budget.


Why It’s Happening

According to Nielsen’s 2025 Annual Marketing Report, marketers are reacting to:

  • Economic uncertainty
  • Supply chain instability
  • Sluggish consumer demand
  • Pressure from the CFO to cut anything that isn’t measurable

The result?
Marketing teams are being told:
👉 “Do more with less.”
👉 “Show me it worked, or don’t do it again.”


What It Means for You

Here’s how the landscape is shifting:

What StaysWhat Gets Cut
Digital with clear metricsBrand campaigns with no follow-up
Performance marketingAwareness-only TV buys
Retail Media Networks (RMNs)“Spray and pray” display ads
Connected TV with targetingVanity metrics (reach, impressions)
Tools that show ROITactics you can’t track

The Big Takeaway: ROI or Die

Nielsen found that 60% of marketers globally now prioritize return on investment—not just reach or awareness.
And guess what?
Most marketers still can’t measure their full campaigns properly.

Only 32% measure digital and traditional media together.
In Europe, it’s even lower—just 23%.

That means most brands are spending blind.


So What’s Working?

📈 Connected TV (CTV):
56% of marketers plan to increase spending here—it’s digital, trackable, and can replace expensive TV spots.

📈 Retail Media Networks (RMNs):
Think Amazon, Walmart, Uber, or even big travel apps. They offer closed-loop measurement—you can see exactly who saw your ad and bought your product. That’s budget gold.

📈 AI-powered campaigns:
Marketers love it for speed, personalization, and media optimization.
(And yes, it’s cheaper than hiring 5 analysts.)


What to Do Now

You don’t need to panic.
You need to prove.

Here’s your 3-part playbook:

1. Only run what you can measure.

Every campaign should show how it impacts revenue, conversions, or growth.

2. Switch to ROI-first channels.

If you can’t show what worked—on paper—it’s a risk.
CTV, retail media, search, and email are safer bets than brand ads with no call to action.

3. Bring finance into marketing.

Treat your campaigns like investments.
Every dollar spent should have a thesis, a goal, and a post-mortem.


This Isn’t Budget Cuts. It’s Budget Evolution.

You’re not losing money.
You’re losing unaccountable spending.

From now on, your best campaign isn’t your most creative.
It’s the one that comes with a receipt.

Page 6 of 3596
1 4 5 6 7 8 3,596