TikTok has been hailed as the great equalizer of modern marketing—a space where brands can reach millions with a single, well-timed post. Its algorithm rewards creativity and engagement, making it a tantalizing platform for brands eager to connect with younger audiences. Yet, new research reveals a troubling truth: much of this content isn’t working.
According to DAIVID, a global creative effectiveness platform, a staggering 84% of branded TikTok videos fail to deliver meaningful emotional engagement or recall. Even more concerning, 24% of these videos evoke intensely negative emotions, such as awkwardness, anxiety, or even disgust. For a platform built on fun and connection, these numbers are a wake-up call.
TikTok’s promise of virality comes with risks, and as more brands jump on the latest dance or hashtag challenge, a deeper issue emerges: When everyone is doing the same thing, what makes you stand out? Are we not supposed to continue building brands on differentiation?
TikTok’s algorithm is a double-edged sword. It rewards content that fits within existing trends, encouraging brands to mimic what’s already working. The result, many brands are producing content that feels interchangeable.
But here’s the problem: TikTok users might engage with these videos, but they don’t always remember the brands behind them. Research shows that TikTok content is 9% less likely to generate intense positive emotions and garners 2.5% less attention than global averages. This isn’t just a numbers game—it’s a question of relevance.
When every coffee shop, sneaker company, and clothing brand participates in the same viral dance, their messages blur together.
TikTok might boost short-term engagement, but does it build long-term loyalty, does it get your message across?
The biggest issue with TikTok marketing isn’t its creativity—it’s its conformity. The pressure to stay relevant on the platform often leads to a flood of repetitive, low-risk, low-value content.
According to Influencer Marketing Hub’s 2024 TikTok Marketing Report, user-generated content (55.7%) outperforms branded challenges (13.1%) in effectiveness. This suggests that audiences value authenticity over slickly produced, trend-chasing videos.
Even worse, DAIVID’s data highlights that 24% of TikTok videos evoke negative emotions, undermining brand trust. Whether it’s a poorly executed challenge or a tone-deaf campaign, these missteps have consequences. Consumers aren’t just disengaging—they’re forming negative associations with the brands involved.
The good news? Brands don’t have to play by TikTok’s rules to succeed on the platform. Instead of chasing trends, they can focus on creating content that reflects their unique voice and values.
TikTok isn’t the problem—it’s how brands use it. The platform offers unparalleled reach and creativity, but only if brands resist the urge to conform. Instead of chasing fleeting trends, the most successful brands will innovate, crafting campaigns that are memorable and meaningful.
Great brands don’t just follow the crowd. They lead with purpose, the differentiate.
In a world of constant content, the challenge isn’t going viral—it’s being remembered.
The path forward is clear, and if the influencer marketing landscape has taught us anything, it’s that authenticity always wins in the long run.
So, the next time your marketing team proposes a TikTok dance or a challenge, ask: “Does this reflect who we are—or just what’s trending?”
In a world where attention spans are short and sameness is everywhere, the boldest move a brand can make is to be itself.
When Algorithms Make Decisions, What Happens to Us?
It starts with a soft chime, just loud enough to catch your attention. You glance at your phone, and there it is: a notification that your groceries are on the way. You didn’t make a list, let alone place an order. Your AI assistant handled everything. It analyzed your pantry, cross-referenced your previous orders, and negotiated the best deals with your preferred stores.
At first, you’re impressed. After all, this is convenience at its finest. But as you unpack the bags later that evening, something feels… off. The coffee is a different brand. The cereal, too. Even the toothpaste isn’t quite right. It’s not what you would’ve chosen.
That’s when it hits you. The assistant didn’t shop for you—it shopped for itself, following priorities set not by your tastes, but by the brands that learned how to win its favor.
This is the new frontier of advertising, where the audience isn’t you anymore. It’s the algorithm. And in this quiet, almost imperceptible shift, the very nature of choice is being rewritten.
Advertising, at its core, has always been about connection. It’s the art of understanding people—their desires, fears, and dreams—and crafting stories that speak to them.
For decades, brands poured their energy into winning hearts and minds. A jingle on the radio. A clever slogan on a billboard. A touching ad during the Super Bowl. It was a dance between creativity and emotion, all designed to resonate with you.
But now, the gatekeepers are changing. Instead of speaking directly to people, brands are starting to learn how to appeal to the machines that make decisions for us. Smart assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Home are no longer passive tools; they’re active participants, deciding what products we see, what services we choose, and how we spend our money.
This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a profound transformation of the relationship between consumers, companies, and the algorithms that now stand between them.
Imagine standing in a grocery store aisle, weighing two options: one cereal is a little cheaper, the other a little healthier. You consider the pros and cons, think about your budget, maybe even remember a jingle from an old commercial. Then you make your choice.
Now imagine that choice is made before you ever step foot in the store. Your smart assistant has already placed the order, choosing the cereal that best aligns with its programmed priorities. Maybe it picked the one with a higher profit margin for the platform. Maybe the brand struck a deal to get on the assistant’s “preferred list.”
You didn’t choose. The algorithm did. And the algorithm didn’t choose for you—it chose based on what served its interests.
This isn’t the future. It’s happening now. AI assistants are already shaping purchasing decisions in subtle but powerful ways. They suggest products, reorder supplies, and guide our choices, often without us realizing it. See what Netflix and Spotify do with their AI suggestions.
And for the brands competing in this new arena, the game is changing. Instead of designing ads to capture your attention, they’re designing strategies to influence the algorithms that hold it.
There’s no denying the appeal of this AI-driven world. It’s efficient, seamless, and tailored to your needs—or so it seems.
But here’s the question we need to ask: what do we lose in this trade-off?
When machines take over the act of choosing, we lose a little bit of agency. We become passengers in a process that was once deeply personal. Decisions that used to involve thought, reflection, and even a touch of joy are reduced to transactions carried out by systems we barely understand.
And it doesn’t stop there. Smaller brands—those without the resources to compete in this algorithmic marketplace—risk being shut out entirely. Innovation suffers when only the biggest players can afford to play.
Most importantly, we lose transparency. How do we know these systems are working in our best interest? Without oversight, it’s impossible to tell whether your assistant is prioritizing your needs or its own bottom line.
This moment asks us to confront some hard truths. The machines we’ve built to simplify our lives are becoming decision-makers in ways we didn’t anticipate. And if we’re not careful, we risk losing control of the very systems we created.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. Technology is a tool, not a destiny. With the right choices, we can ensure these systems serve us, not the other way around.
It starts with demanding transparency—from the companies that build these algorithms, from the brands that work with them, and from the policymakers who regulate them. It requires vigilance from all of us to ensure that as technology grows smarter, it also grows fairer.
Most of all, it requires us to stay engaged. To ask questions. To insist on systems that reflect our values, our humanity, and our shared commitment to fairness and choice.
Progress isn’t just about what we can build—it’s about who we want to be. It’s not enough to marvel at the efficiency of these systems. We have to ensure they respect our dignity, protect our choices, and serve the greater good.
The rise of AI advertising isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a test of our values. And as we navigate this new world, let’s remember: the best technology doesn’t replace humans It enhances them. This is our moment to shape the future. Let’s make it one we can be proud of.
image via
If Everyone’s a Brand, Is Anyone Truly Themselves?
Scroll through Instagram. What do you see? Polished vacation shots. Carefully worded captions. Vulnerability dressed up for maximum engagement. Every friend has become a lifestyle influencer, every coworker a thought leader, every teenager a TikTok creator hustling for virality.
We’ve reached a point where living authentically feels like a revolutionary act. In this world, you’re not just you—you’re a brand.
What happens when every moment is curated, every thought is monetized, and every person becomes their own product? Who are we when the lights go off, and the algorithm stops caring?
This is the age of the brand-ividual—a world where personal branding isn’t just a tool; it’s a survival strategy. And while it promises visibility, control, and opportunity, it comes with a cost we haven’t fully reckoned with.
Personal branding wasn’t born with social media, but platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, and TikTok turned it into a global obsession. At first, it felt empowering. No longer confined to corporate gatekeepers, anyone could broadcast their ideas, showcase their talents, and create their own success.
But somewhere along the way, the lines blurred. The professional became personal. The personal became performative. Suddenly, everyone—from high school students to CEOs—felt the need to market themselves, whether they wanted to or not.
Today, it’s not enough to just live your life. You have to package it, post it, and promote it. Every meal is a potential story. Every sunset, a potential Reel. Every moment, a chance to sell yourself.
The problem is, branding isn’t being. The more we curate, the more disconnected we become—not just from others but from ourselves.
The societal implications are staggering.
It doesn’t have to be this way. Personal branding isn’t inherently bad—it’s how we use it that matters. The key is reclaiming control, setting boundaries, and remembering that who we are is not the same as what we post.
The challenge isn’t to stop sharing our stories. It’s to share them on our terms. To resist the pressure to perform, and instead, choose to be present. To remember that our worth isn’t in our brand—but in our humanity.
Where vulnerability isn’t measured in likes, and the connection isn’t filtered through an algorithm.
The future isn’t about selling yourself—it’s about finding yourself. Because the world doesn’t need more brands. It requires more people willing to show up, unpolished and unfiltered, just as they are. Because if everyone’s a brand, we risk losing the most important thing we have: ourselves.
