Info

Posts tagged data

The data is clear. But the story we’ve been telling about it is broken.

Every year, we get a new “Voice of the Consumer” report from the corporate priesthood. And every year, it’s presented like a sterile oracle: bar charts, consumer personas, a sprinkle of AI buzzwords. But underneath the metrics lies something far more human. And far more troubling.

Good looking woman standing in front of vegetable shelves choosing what to buy.

Because in 2025, your grocery cart has become a battlefield.
Between health and affordability.
Between eco-anxiety and economic survival.
Between what we say we want—and what we’re actually allowed to choose.

Let’s decode the truth behind the data.


60% Are Worried About Processed Foods. But That’s Mostly What They Can Afford.

Consumers are scared of what’s in their food—ultra-processed snacks, pesticide-ridden produce, hormone-laced meat. And yet… sales of junk continue. Why?

Because while 60% say safety trumps price, 100% still live in a system that prices purity as a luxury.

Food has become a class issue. Wellness a branding exercise. And every “healthy choice” is wrapped in a surcharge.


Health Is the New Religion. Tech Is the High Priest.

70% of global consumers now use health-tracking apps and wearables.
9% say it changed their lives.
Yet what’s really changed is the relationship between the body and data.

Every calorie, every step, every purchase now feeds an invisible feedback loop—where AI doesn’t just monitor you. It markets back at you.

Imagine: A world where your fridge syncs with your weight-loss meds. Your cart is optimized not for cravings, but compliance. You don’t eat to live—you log to exist.


80% Fear Climate Change. 44% Say They’ll Pay More. Most Won’t.

Here lies the great paradox: Eco-consciousness is rising. But so is inflation.
People care—but caring is expensive. And the marketplace is cynical.

We say “organic,” but tolerate greenwashed supply chains.
We want “local,” but settle for global giants who slap “farm-fresh” on everything.

It’s not that consumers are hypocrites.
It’s that the system punishes alignment.


GenAI Will Soon Choose Your Meals. But Who’s Choosing GenAI?

Roughly 1 in 2 consumers now say they’re open to using GenAI to plan meals or suggest grocery items. Sounds convenient—until you realize these algorithms don’t just serve you. They shape you.

Ask yourself: When AI curates your cart based on health goals, budget, and brand partnerships… is that still your choice?

The question isn’t will AI influence consumer behavior. It’s: Who owns the algorithm that owns the consumer?


The Most Important Stat? 51% Say Brands Are Responsible for Our Health.

Not governments. Not hospitals.
Brands.

Let that sink in.

Food companies have become de facto health ministries. And the public expects them to behave like it—whether they’re ready or not.

This is the new contract. And most brands are breaking it daily.


Conclusion: The Consumer Is Not Confused. The System Is Rigged.

The 2025 consumer isn’t fickle. They’re fragmented—by design.

We are overfed and undernourished. Digitally empowered, yet algorithmically steered. Climate-aware, yet economically cornered.

And every product, every promise, every “personalized experience” is a mirror—reflecting not just who we are, but who we’re becoming.

The real voice of the consumer?
It’s not just a survey.
It’s a scream.

Check every data over at pwc image via freepic

I had an interesting chat today about whether magic in advertising still remains .

In the golden age of advertising, campaigns weren’t just about selling products—they were about selling ideas, dreams, and emotions. Think of Coca-Cola’s “Hilltop” ad, with its chorus of voices singing about unity and peace, or Apple’s iconic “1984” spot, which heralded the dawn of a new era in personal computing. These weren’t just ads; they were cultural moments, etched into the collective consciousness. They worked because they dared to be different.

But today, the creative spark that once defined advertising seems to be flickering out. In its place, we have an industry increasingly dominated by algorithms and data-driven decision-making. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning has brought unprecedented precision to ad targeting and performance measurement. Brands can now tailor their messages to specific audiences with incredible accuracy, optimizing every element of a campaign in real-time. On the surface, it’s a marketer’s dream. But beneath the surface lies a troubling truth: the relentless pursuit of optimization is strangling creativity.

The Algorithmic Trap

At first glance, it’s easy to see the appeal of data-driven advertising. Why take risks when you can use algorithms to predict exactly what will resonate with your audience? Why rely on intuition when machine learning can tell you the perfect color for a call-to-action button or the ideal length of a video ad? The problem is that data only tells us what has worked in the past. And when decisions are made purely based on past performance, the result is often a race to the middle—a homogenized landscape where every ad looks, feels, and sounds the same.

Take the rise of programmatic advertising. By using algorithms to buy and place ads, brands can ensure their messages reach the right people at the right time. But what’s often sacrificed in the process is the human element—the bold, unexpected ideas that grab our attention and linger in our minds. The irony is that while algorithms excel at optimizing for clicks, shares, and conversions, they struggle to account for the intangible qualities that make an ad truly memorable.

The Creativity Crisis

This reliance on data and AI is fostering a culture of risk aversion. In an era where every decision is scrutinized through the lens of performance metrics, there’s little room for experimentation. The result is a flood of safe, formulaic ads designed to maximize short-term gains at the expense of long-term brand building. Creativity thrives on uncertainty, on the willingness to take risks and embrace the possibility of failure. But in a world governed by algorithms, failure is a luxury few are willing to afford.

Consider the case of Super Bowl ads. Once a showcase for daring, innovative storytelling, many of today’s big-game spots feel more like calculated exercises in brand-safe messaging. The stakes are too high, and the data too abundant, for brands to take a chance on something truly groundbreaking. Instead, we get a steady stream of feel-good montages, celebrity cameos, and humor that’s been tested to within an inch of its life.

Finding a Balance

Does this mean data and AI are inherently bad for advertising? Not necessarily. When used thoughtfully, these tools can enhance creativity, providing valuable insights and freeing up time for human ingenuity. The key is to strike a balance—to use data as a guide, not a crutch. Some of the most successful campaigns of recent years have managed to do just that, blending data-driven insights with bold, creative ideas.

Take Spotify’s “Wrapped” campaign, which uses personalized data to create highly engaging, shareable content. Or Nike’s “Dream Crazy” ad featuring Colin Kaepernick, which leveraged data to understand its audience but still took a bold stand on a divisive issue. These campaigns show that it’s possible to harness the power of data without sacrificing originality.

The Way Forward

The future of advertising depends on our ability to reclaim creativity from the clutches of algorithms. This means embracing uncertainty, celebrating bold ideas, and recognizing that not everything can—or should—be optimized. It means trusting in the power of human intuition and storytelling, even when the data says otherwise. Because at the end of the day, the ads that truly resonate aren’t the ones that are perfectly optimized; they’re the ones that dare to be different.

via

via

Self-initiated visual research by Media around data processing! Lovely stuff

years

Momma always said dyin’ was a part of life. —Forrest Gump. A Flowing Data’s interactive graphic, which shows the years you have left based on your age and sex.

Years You Have Left to Live, Probably

Momma always said dyin’ was a part of life. —Forrest Gump. A Flowing Data’s interactive graphic, which shows the years you have left based on your age and sex.

Page 1 of 2
1 2