Info

Posts tagged europe

Today, September 12, the European Union stands at a breaking point. Behind the dry name “Regulation to Prevent and Combat Child Sexual Abuse” hides a law that would scan every private message sent across the continent. WhatsApp. Signal. Telegram. None would escape. Encryption would be gutted before it even begins.

The idea is sold as protection for children. The reality is the birth of mass surveillance in Europe.

Germany is the Decider

Fifteen governments have lined up in support. Yet they lack the population weight to push it through. Germany alone carries enough heft to make or break the law. If Berlin backs it, the measure passes. If Berlin resists, it collapses. If Berlin hesitates, the door opens to a watered-down compromise that is no less dangerous.

This is not just another policy debate. It is a turning point in Europe’s identity. Germany is not voting on a technicality. It is choosing whether every citizen will be treated as a suspect by default.

Why the Law is Rotten

The technology does not work. Filters cannot reliably identify abuse material. False alarms will overwhelm investigators. Real predators will slip through unnoticed. Courts in both Luxembourg and Karlsruhe have already warned against blanket surveillance. The law is built on shaky ground, legally and technically.

And the moral cost is staggering. A society that normalizes scanning every private word has abandoned the presumption of innocence. The right to whisper without permission is not a luxury. It is the bedrock of democracy.

The Mirage of Safety

Child protection is sacred, but it demands real solutions. Better investigators. Faster cross-border cooperation. Proper funding for Europol. Not a blunt instrument that spies on everyone while failing the very children it claims to defend.

Surveillance does not equal safety. It equals control. And once control is given, it is never returned.

The Choice

This is more than a law. It is a declaration of what kind of Europe we want to inhabit. One path leads to a continent of suspicion, where private speech exists only by state permission. The other path preserves Europe as the last great defender of digital freedom in a world where both Washington and Beijing demand backdoors.

The Question

If Germany votes yes, it will not simply pass a regulation. It will write the obituary of Europe’s private life.

The question for today is not what happens if we reject Chat Control. The question is what happens to Europe if we accept it.

Because once the right to whisper is gone, the silence that follows will not belong to the children. It will belong to all of us.

There are moments when history pauses, looks us dead in the eye, and asks: do you understand what is happening? This is one of them.

We are told that “peace” is being negotiated. Cameras flash, leaders shake hands, headlines sigh in relief. But listen more closely: the word “peace” here has been hollowed out. What is being offered is not an end to war but a linguistic trick—territory traded under the table, sovereignty redefined as bargaining chips. It is settlement for some, surrender for others, dressed up as salvation for all.

This isn’t new. Europe has heard this music before. In 1938, the word was “appeasement.” Leaders congratulated themselves for buying peace by abandoning those caught in the path of aggression. What followed was not peace but the validation of violence, the confirmation that might could dictate borders. Every time we accept aggression as fait accompli, we do not prevent the next war—we finance it.

What’s unfolding now is not a “peace process” but the laundering of defeat. The aggressor demands recognition for his spoils. The mediator smiles, relieved to notch a diplomatic “win.” And the victim is told, once again, to swallow the loss for the greater good.

But whose good? Whose peace?

If sovereignty can be traded away without the consent of the sovereign, then the word itself becomes meaningless. If peace means rewarding the invader and isolating the invaded, then peace becomes indistinguishable from surrender. And if Europe accepts this language, it will be complicit in rewriting the postwar order into something unrecognizable: a world where borders are drawn not by law or consent, but by force and fatigue.

We stand at a rhetorical crossroads. One path leads to an honest settlement—messy, difficult, but grounded in consent and legitimacy. The other path leads to surrender disguised as peace, a mask that fools no one but comforts the powerful.

The question is simple. When the mask slips—and it always does—will we admit that we knew all along what we were watching? Or will we pretend we were deceived, when the truth was staring at us from the first handshake


At first glance, it’s harmless:
Singers in silver capes. Pyro. Ballads. Beats.
A kitsch-fest so over-the-top it feels like satire.

But here’s the thing:

Eurovision isn’t just camp. It’s code.

Behind the smoke machines and synthetic choruses is a glitter-soaked simulation of Western unity.

This isn’t just Europe’s Got Talent.
It’s Europe’s Got Allegiances.


The Sparkly Remains of World War II

Eurovision was born from the ashes—literally.
Created in 1956 to help a bombed-out continent “unite through music.”

Translation?

“Let’s stop killing each other and throw a party instead.”

But as NATO grew teeth and borders shifted, so did Eurovision.
It became a stage not just for songs—but for statements.

Who gets cheered. Who gets snubbed. Who gets banned.
It’s a soft-power scoreboard—with better outfits.


This Is How You Know It’s Not Just Music

  • Ukraine wins during war.
  • Russia gets kicked out.
  • The UK gets ghosted post-Brexit.
  • Israel …Moroccanoil .. stays in, Turkey stays out.
  • And bloc voting? Alive and lip-synching.

Songs don’t win. Signals do.
Alignment. Affiliation. Aesthetic diplomacy.

It’s not “best performance.”
It’s “who’s playing nice with the Western order.”


The Real Costume Is Conformity

That dramatic ballad about suffering? Approved.
That flamboyant drag act? Celebrated—but only if it feels safe.
That quirky rebellion anthem? Cool—as long as it doesn’t shake actual power.

You can be radical—but only on schedule.
You can be queer—but keep it exportable.
You can talk politics—but only if the room agrees.

Eurovision lets you say anything—
as long as it sounds like belonging.


What We’re Really Watching

Eurovision is a moodboard for modern Western values:
Peace, but photogenic.
Progress, but polished.
Identity, but Instagrammable.

And beneath it all?
A quiet reminder:

“If you want to be seen, sound like us.”


So Let’s Call It What It Is

Eurovision is NATO in drag.
It’s a velvet-wrapped loyalty test.
A post-war pact turned pop pageant.
Where the winner isn’t the voice—it’s the vibe.

And if you don’t match it?
You don’t make the finals.

Maybe the real performance isn’t on stage—it’s us clapping, thinking it’s just a show!

now you know! via

by Gary motion

Europe Is Lost

by Gary motion

@childishgambino @foureira @eurovision_news_2018 @eurovision not mine via @luben.tv #eurovision #europe #fuego

Page 1 of 8
1 2 3 8