Info

Posts tagged Ai

Choose another tag?

Meet Lil Miquela. She’s a 19-year-old Brazilian-American model with over 2,5 million Instagram followers. She wears the latest streetwear, collaborates with top fashion brands like Prada and Calvin Klein, and engages her fans with heartfelt captions about social justice. But here’s the catch: Lil Miquela isn’t real. She’s a computer-generated character brought to life by a Los Angeles-based company called Brud.

And she’s not alone. Shudu, often dubbed the world’s first digital supermodel, graces magazine covers and partners with luxury brands like Balmain. Imma, a pink-haired Japanese virtual influencer, is a staple in the fashion and tech industries. These AI influencers don’t just exist—they thrive, raking in millions and reshaping the influencer marketing landscape.

This raises a question we can’t afford to ignore: When influencers are no longer human, what happens to authenticity, creativity, and trust?


The AI Advantage: Flawless and Forever

AI influencers like Lil Miquela have distinct advantages over their human counterparts. They don’t age, they don’t get tired, they never go off-brand and they never sound like idiots. They’re meticulously designed to be relatable yet aspirational, operating 24/7 to engage their audiences without ever slipping up.

For brands, this is a dream come true. AI influencers offer complete creative control. They can be programmed to align perfectly with a campaign’s values, adjust their appearance for different demographics, and respond to trends at lightning speed.

Consider this: According to Statista the global influencer marketing market size has more than tripled since 2019. In 2024, the market was estimated to reach a record of 24 billion US dollars.

With AI influencers offering cost efficiency and reliability, their slice of this pie is growing exponentially.

But what happens when perfection becomes the norm? Are we trading human connection for digital consistency?


One of the most polarizing aspects of AI influencers is the question of transparency.

When you double-tap on a post by Shudu, do you know you’re engaging with a digital creation? Many followers of these AI influencers believe they’re interacting with real people—an illusion that companies are often happy to maintain.

This blurring of lines raises ethical concerns. Should brands be required to disclose when an influencer isn’t human? Are these digital personas stealing opportunities from real creators, especially as companies allocate their budgets toward AI campaigns?

In 2023, Calvin Klein faced backlash for featuring Lil Miquela in a campaign where she shared a kiss with supermodel Bella Hadid.

Critics argued that the campaign commodified identity and blurred the lines of authenticity in an exploitative way. Calvin Klein later apologized, but the controversy sparked a broader debate: Is it ethical to present AI influencers as equals—or even replacements—for human voices?


The Emotional Disconnect: Can We Trust What Isn’t Real?

Authenticity has long been the cornerstone of influencer marketing. Followers gravitate toward influencers who share their struggles, joys, and imperfections. But what happens when those imperfections are replaced with algorithmic precision?

Fans of Imma, the Japanese virtual influencer, might marvel at her perfectly curated feed. Yet, can someone who’s never experienced joy, heartbreak, or growth truly connect on a human level? And if they can’t, are they still influencers—or are they just marketing tools?


The rise of AI influencers isn’t just a technological trend—it’s a societal shift.

We’re moving into a world where human experience is being outsourced to machines. For brands, this offers unparalleled creative possibilities. For society, it raises profound questions about what we value in our interactions and connections.

The influencer economy was built on relatability, the idea that someone like you could rise to fame by being authentic and accessible. But as AI influencers dominate, we must ask: Are we ready to embrace a future where the most influential voices in our culture aren’t even human?


This isn’t a rally against AI influencers.

Technology has always pushed us forward, challenging our ideas of what’s possible. But as we move deeper into this digital frontier, we must demand transparency, ethics, and a commitment to preserving what makes us human.

The question isn’t whether AI can influence us—it already does. The question is, how do we ensure that as technology advances, it serves our humanity, not replaces it?

So, the next time you scroll through your feed and see a flawless smile staring back at you, ask yourself: Who—or what—is behind it? And more importantly, what does that say about the world we’re building? Stay Curious!

When Algorithms Make Decisions, What Happens to Us?


It starts with a soft chime, just loud enough to catch your attention. You glance at your phone, and there it is: a notification that your groceries are on the way. You didn’t make a list, let alone place an order. Your AI assistant handled everything. It analyzed your pantry, cross-referenced your previous orders, and negotiated the best deals with your preferred stores.

At first, you’re impressed. After all, this is convenience at its finest. But as you unpack the bags later that evening, something feels… off. The coffee is a different brand. The cereal, too. Even the toothpaste isn’t quite right. It’s not what you would’ve chosen.

That’s when it hits you. The assistant didn’t shop for you—it shopped for itself, following priorities set not by your tastes, but by the brands that learned how to win its favor.

This is the new frontier of advertising, where the audience isn’t you anymore. It’s the algorithm. And in this quiet, almost imperceptible shift, the very nature of choice is being rewritten.


A World of Gatekeepers

Advertising, at its core, has always been about connection. It’s the art of understanding people—their desires, fears, and dreams—and crafting stories that speak to them.

For decades, brands poured their energy into winning hearts and minds. A jingle on the radio. A clever slogan on a billboard. A touching ad during the Super Bowl. It was a dance between creativity and emotion, all designed to resonate with you.

But now, the gatekeepers are changing. Instead of speaking directly to people, brands are starting to learn how to appeal to the machines that make decisions for us. Smart assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Home are no longer passive tools; they’re active participants, deciding what products we see, what services we choose, and how we spend our money.

This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a profound transformation of the relationship between consumers, companies, and the algorithms that now stand between them.


The Algorithm Decides

Imagine standing in a grocery store aisle, weighing two options: one cereal is a little cheaper, the other a little healthier. You consider the pros and cons, think about your budget, maybe even remember a jingle from an old commercial. Then you make your choice.

Now imagine that choice is made before you ever step foot in the store. Your smart assistant has already placed the order, choosing the cereal that best aligns with its programmed priorities. Maybe it picked the one with a higher profit margin for the platform. Maybe the brand struck a deal to get on the assistant’s “preferred list.”

You didn’t choose. The algorithm did. And the algorithm didn’t choose for you—it chose based on what served its interests.

This isn’t the future. It’s happening now. AI assistants are already shaping purchasing decisions in subtle but powerful ways. They suggest products, reorder supplies, and guide our choices, often without us realizing it. See what Netflix and Spotify do with their AI suggestions.

And for the brands competing in this new arena, the game is changing. Instead of designing ads to capture your attention, they’re designing strategies to influence the algorithms that hold it.


The Cost of Convenience

There’s no denying the appeal of this AI-driven world. It’s efficient, seamless, and tailored to your needs—or so it seems.

But here’s the question we need to ask: what do we lose in this trade-off?

When machines take over the act of choosing, we lose a little bit of agency. We become passengers in a process that was once deeply personal. Decisions that used to involve thought, reflection, and even a touch of joy are reduced to transactions carried out by systems we barely understand.

And it doesn’t stop there. Smaller brands—those without the resources to compete in this algorithmic marketplace—risk being shut out entirely. Innovation suffers when only the biggest players can afford to play.

Most importantly, we lose transparency. How do we know these systems are working in our best interest? Without oversight, it’s impossible to tell whether your assistant is prioritizing your needs or its own bottom line.


A Future Worth Shaping

This moment asks us to confront some hard truths. The machines we’ve built to simplify our lives are becoming decision-makers in ways we didn’t anticipate. And if we’re not careful, we risk losing control of the very systems we created.

But it doesn’t have to be this way. Technology is a tool, not a destiny. With the right choices, we can ensure these systems serve us, not the other way around.

It starts with demanding transparency—from the companies that build these algorithms, from the brands that work with them, and from the policymakers who regulate them. It requires vigilance from all of us to ensure that as technology grows smarter, it also grows fairer.

Most of all, it requires us to stay engaged. To ask questions. To insist on systems that reflect our values, our humanity, and our shared commitment to fairness and choice.


The Responsibility of Progress

Progress isn’t just about what we can build—it’s about who we want to be. It’s not enough to marvel at the efficiency of these systems. We have to ensure they respect our dignity, protect our choices, and serve the greater good.

The rise of AI advertising isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a test of our values. And as we navigate this new world, let’s remember: the best technology doesn’t replace humans It enhances them. This is our moment to shape the future. Let’s make it one we can be proud of.

image via

Picture this: A teenager sits on their bed, phone in hand, endlessly scrolling through TikTok. One video makes them laugh. Another shows them a product they didn’t know they needed. Hours pass, and when they finally put their phone down, the world feels no different. They feel no different.

This isn’t just a snapshot of today—it’s the chilling reality Aldous Huxley envisioned in Brave New World. A society pacified not by oppression, but by pleasure. A generation distracted, not by force, but by convenience. And the question we must ask ourselves is simple but urgent: Are we raising a generation that will never dream of revolution?


The Role of Technology: Algorithms as the New Conditioning

In Huxley’s world, people were conditioned to love their servitude. Today, we don’t need dystopian conditioning—we have algorithms.

Every swipe, click, and search is analyzed, creating a feedback loop that shapes what we see. TikTok feeds us what’s familiar. Spotify curates playlists that reflect who we already are. Amazon predicts our needs before we voice them.

These tools are convenient, even impressive. But they come with a cost: They narrow our perspectives, flatten our curiosity, and keep us in comfortable bubbles. The result? A generation that rarely questions what lies beyond the algorithm.

When technology decides for us, are we still free to think for ourselves?


Consumerism: Selling Conformity as Individuality

In Brave New World, consumerism wasn’t just an economic system—it was a way of life. People were conditioned to consume endlessly, equating happiness with possessions.

Today, brands don’t just sell products—they sell identities. Social media influencers promote lifestyles that look unique but follow the same template: curated, polished, and monetized. Consumers, especially young people, are encouraged to express individuality through what they buy, wear, or post.

But is this individuality, or just another layer of conformity? When a generation is taught to find meaning through consumption, rebellion becomes harder to imagine.


Education: From Curiosity to Compliance

Education should be the antidote to conformity—a place where young minds are inspired to question, imagine, and innovate. But too often, it isn’t.

Standardized testing prioritizes rote memorization over critical thinking. Curriculums focus on compliance rather than creativity. Students learn what to think, not how to think.

Without curiosity, there is no rebellion. Without imagination, there is no change. If we want a generation that dreams of revolution, we must demand an education system that values exploration over standardization.


Entertainment: The Great Pacifier

Huxley’s society distracted its citizens with shallow entertainment, keeping them too busy enjoying themselves to question the world around them. Sound familiar?

Today, endless content streams—from Netflix binges to viral TikToks—dominate our time and attention. Entertainment is designed to keep us scrolling, laughing, and consuming. But when was the last time a binge-watch session left you inspired to take action?

Entertainment doesn’t have to be a pacifier. It can be a spark. Think of documentaries that ignite movements, campaigns that challenge norms, or art that provokes conversation.

If we demand more from our entertainment, it can do more than distract us—it can drive us to dream.


AI: The Invisible Puppeteer

Artificial intelligence is the most powerful force shaping our generation. It curates our feeds, writes our stories, and even creates our art. But with that power comes a question: Whose values is AI reflecting—ours, or the system’s?

Generative AI is already influencing how we consume and create. From AI-generated influencers to automated content creation, technology is blurring the line between authentic creativity and algorithmic conformity.

But AI can also be a tool for revolution. It can amplify voices, connect communities, and democratize knowledge. The choice is ours: Will AI empower us, or pacify us?


Are we building a world that sparks curiosity—or suppresses it?

Are we raising a generation that dares to dream—or one that’s content to scroll trapped in its own little bubble full of apathy, tired from the constant economic crises, unemployment, and wars?

Let’s choose action. Let’s choose curiosity. Let’s choose revolution—not just in protest, but in thought, creativity, and compassion. The future depends on it.

via


The Perfect Meal, or a Starvation Diet?

Imagine sitting down at a restaurant where every dish has been chosen for you. The menu isn’t based on the chef’s creativity or what you might want to try—it’s based entirely on what you’ve ordered before. Did you like pasta last time? Here’s another plate of pasta. In fact ,every course is pasta.

At first, it feels familiar, comforting even. But after a while, you realize something’s missing: variety, novelty, balance. You’re full, but you’re not nourished.

Now replace that menu with your digital life. Every ad, every article, every video has been carefully chosen—not by you, but by an algorithm trained to give you what it thinks you’ll want. AI curates your reality, one hyper-targeted piece at a time. And while it might feel satisfying in the short term, the long-term effects could leave us all starving for truth, diversity, and connection.


The Algorithm’s Invisible Hand

AI isn’t just deciding which sneakers you’ll see in an ad or which playlist to queue up. It’s shaping your world. Every like, click, and purchase feeds a system designed to predict your behavior and keep you engaged. It doesn’t just show you ads—it decides what news you’ll read, what ideas you’ll encounter, and what version of reality you’ll believe.

This is a filter bubble—a curated, digital echo chamber where your preferences are mirrored back at you. It’s efficient, even ingenious. But it’s also dangerous. Because when AI prioritizes engagement over exploration, we lose the chance to challenge our assumptions and grow.


The Cost of Curated Reality

Let’s be clear: this isn’t just about what brand of coffee you’ll buy next. It’s about something much bigger.

  1. Polarization and Division:
    When algorithms show you content that reinforces your beliefs, they make opposing views feel not just wrong, but incomprehensible. This doesn’t just polarize individuals—it fractures communities, deepens divides, and weakens the very foundations of democracy.
  2. The Death of Shared Truths:
    In the past, we might have argued over what a headline meant, but at least we agreed on the headline itself. Now, with AI-curated realities, even that common ground is disappearing. If two people are seeing entirely different versions of reality, how can they ever meet in the middle?
  3. Manipulation at Scale:
    AI doesn’t just cater to your interests; it shapes them. Ads and content become tools for subtle, invisible manipulation. They exploit your emotions—your fear, your joy, your anger—to nudge you toward decisions you didn’t consciously make.

Who Holds the Power?

This brings us to a critical question: who controls the narrative?

AI isn’t neutral. It’s trained on data that reflects our biases, our inequities, our flaws. And it’s owned by corporations whose primary goal is profit, not the public good. That means the content you see—and the beliefs it reinforces—are shaped by forces far beyond your control.

We’ve seen the consequences. Eroding trust in institutions. A media landscape that feels less like a public square and more like a hall of mirrors. A world where we’re more connected than ever but somehow more divided, too.


Can AI Be a Force for Good?

Here’s the thing: this doesn’t have to be our future. AI isn’t inherently harmful—it’s a tool. And like any tool, its impact depends on how we use it. Imagine an AI that expands your horizons instead of narrowing them.

  • Introducing New Perspectives: What if algorithms prioritized diversity of thought, exposing you to ideas and cultures you’d never encounter otherwise?
  • Fostering Connection: What if AI helped bridge divides, finding common ground between opposing viewpoints?
  • Supporting Truth: What if the systems that curate your content were designed to prioritize accuracy, fairness, and transparency over engagement?

This isn’t just wishful thinking. It’s entirely possible—if we demand it.


A Call to Action

So, where do we go from here? The first step is understanding that we have the power to shape this technology. Transparency must become the norm. People deserve to know why they’re seeing an ad or piece of content, who paid for it, and what data was used to target them. Algorithms shouldn’t be hidden in black boxes—they should be as open as the information they curate.

At the same time, we must demand accountability from the companies designing these systems. These tools are shaping not just what we buy but how we think, how we see the world, and how we connect with one another. That kind of power comes with responsibility. It’s time for businesses to prioritize ethics over profit, creating AI that challenges us to grow instead of simply confirming our biases.

But this isn’t just about corporations or governments. It’s about us, too. We have a role to play. Every time you scroll, click, or share, you’re feeding the system. Ask yourself: Why am I seeing this? Who benefits from my engagement? The more critical and intentional we are about our digital experiences, the harder it becomes for anyone—be it an algorithm or a corporation—to manipulate our choices.

If we take these steps together, we can create a digital landscape that doesn’t just cater to our preferences but broadens our horizons. A place where technology is a tool for connection, understanding, and truth, rather than division and manipulation.


The power of AI is immense

It can divide us, or it can unite us. It can exploit our weaknesses, or it can amplify our strengths. The choice isn’t up to the algorithms—it’s up to us.

We stand at a crossroads. Let’s choose a future where technology doesn’t just cater to our preferences, but broadens our horizons. A future where AI serves humanity, not the other way around. Because when it comes to the stories we see, the ideas we believe, and the realities we inhabit, the most important question isn’t what AI can do—it’s what we’ll allow it to become.

image via


AI Wants to Make You Cry… But Can It?

Picture this: a bot walks into a bar, tries to write an emotional ad, and the bartender says, “Nice try, buddy.” That’s where we are with AI in advertising. Sure, it can churn out 500 headlines before you’ve finished your coffee, but let’s face it—it’s still got the emotional range of a toaster.

Take O2’s “Daisy” campaign. It’s an AI scam-busting superhero that talks like your sweet old granny. Clever? Yes. Emotional? Maybe. But does it really move you? That’s where the rubber meets the road.


AI: The Shiny New Toy Everyone’s Fighting Over

Let’s get one thing straight: AI is everywhere. It’s optimizing your ad placements, writing your copy, and probably deciding what color your brand’s logo should be by the time you finish this paragraph. Tools like DALL·E and ChatGPT are the industry’s new darlings, cranking out visuals and taglines faster than you can say “focus group.”

And then there’s Daisy, O2’s AI-powered fraud fighter. She’s not selling you soda or sneakers—she’s wasting the time of scammers who prey on the elderly. It’s a genius concept: while Daisy chats about knitting and her cat, the scammers are tied up, unable to swindle real people. Brilliant, right? But here’s the twist: the genius lies not in the AI’s tech but in the human-designed persona that makes Daisy believable. Daisy’s personality sounds like someone your grandma would adore, so it became a media darling, showcasing AI’s potential for good while making us chuckle at its charm.


Where AI Falls Flat: The Emotional Void

Let’s be real. AI can write an ad, but can it write one that gives you goosebumps? The kind of ad that makes you tear up during the Super Bowl? Not yet. Because great advertising isn’t just about the right words or images—it’s about human truth. And truth isn’t in the data; it’s in the messy, unpredictable emotions that come with being alive.

Think about the “Real Beauty” campaign by Dove or Nike’s “You Can’t Stop Us”.

Those weren’t just ads; they were cultural moments. AI could’ve written the slogans, sure, but it couldn’t have captured the cultural pulse that made them iconic.

According to the Marketing AI Institute, 98% of marketers now use AI in their campaigns, but the fact remains that AI lacks true emotional understanding and the ability to navigate complex human interactions. That’s the gap, folks. AI can crunch numbers and spit out copy, correct tex, but it can’t replicate the lived experiences that resonate on a gut level.


Where AI Shines: Efficiency, Precision, and Scale

Let’s not throw the robot out with the bathwater. AI is a beast when it comes to:

  • Speed: Need 50 versions of a headline? Done.
  • Personalization: Hyper-targeted ads based on your Spotify playlist? No problem.
  • Optimization: Real-time tweaking based on performance data? AI’s got it covered.


The Future: Man and Machine, Not Man vs. Machine

Here’s the truth: the future of advertising isn’t about choosing between humans and AI. It’s about finding the sweet spot where both shine. Think of AI as your trusty sidekick—it’s Batman’s Alfred, not Batman. It can handle the grunt work, leaving creatives to do what they do best: tell stories that stick.

Coca-Cola’s “Masterpiece” campaign used AI to animate iconic artworks, but the emotional hook—the journey of the Coke bottle—was 100% human storytelling. Without that heart, the ad would’ve been just another flashy animation.


A Word of Caution: Don’t Get Lazy

Here’s the danger: as AI gets better, the temptation will be to let it do everything. But great ads don’t come from a machine—they come from sleepless nights, terrible coffee, and people arguing in conference rooms about what will make someone laugh, cry, or think.: Don’t let the machine do your job for you. Let it do the heavy lifting so you can focus on what matters—creating something real, something human.

Oh well, why bother, why work harder? Let’s just celebrate the meaning of Christmas with some very fake AI advert that sucks from humanity all the Christmas joy.

I had an interesting chat today about whether magic in advertising still remains .

In the golden age of advertising, campaigns weren’t just about selling products—they were about selling ideas, dreams, and emotions. Think of Coca-Cola’s “Hilltop” ad, with its chorus of voices singing about unity and peace, or Apple’s iconic “1984” spot, which heralded the dawn of a new era in personal computing. These weren’t just ads; they were cultural moments, etched into the collective consciousness. They worked because they dared to be different.

But today, the creative spark that once defined advertising seems to be flickering out. In its place, we have an industry increasingly dominated by algorithms and data-driven decision-making. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning has brought unprecedented precision to ad targeting and performance measurement. Brands can now tailor their messages to specific audiences with incredible accuracy, optimizing every element of a campaign in real-time. On the surface, it’s a marketer’s dream. But beneath the surface lies a troubling truth: the relentless pursuit of optimization is strangling creativity.

The Algorithmic Trap

At first glance, it’s easy to see the appeal of data-driven advertising. Why take risks when you can use algorithms to predict exactly what will resonate with your audience? Why rely on intuition when machine learning can tell you the perfect color for a call-to-action button or the ideal length of a video ad? The problem is that data only tells us what has worked in the past. And when decisions are made purely based on past performance, the result is often a race to the middle—a homogenized landscape where every ad looks, feels, and sounds the same.

Take the rise of programmatic advertising. By using algorithms to buy and place ads, brands can ensure their messages reach the right people at the right time. But what’s often sacrificed in the process is the human element—the bold, unexpected ideas that grab our attention and linger in our minds. The irony is that while algorithms excel at optimizing for clicks, shares, and conversions, they struggle to account for the intangible qualities that make an ad truly memorable.

The Creativity Crisis

This reliance on data and AI is fostering a culture of risk aversion. In an era where every decision is scrutinized through the lens of performance metrics, there’s little room for experimentation. The result is a flood of safe, formulaic ads designed to maximize short-term gains at the expense of long-term brand building. Creativity thrives on uncertainty, on the willingness to take risks and embrace the possibility of failure. But in a world governed by algorithms, failure is a luxury few are willing to afford.

Consider the case of Super Bowl ads. Once a showcase for daring, innovative storytelling, many of today’s big-game spots feel more like calculated exercises in brand-safe messaging. The stakes are too high, and the data too abundant, for brands to take a chance on something truly groundbreaking. Instead, we get a steady stream of feel-good montages, celebrity cameos, and humor that’s been tested to within an inch of its life.

Finding a Balance

Does this mean data and AI are inherently bad for advertising? Not necessarily. When used thoughtfully, these tools can enhance creativity, providing valuable insights and freeing up time for human ingenuity. The key is to strike a balance—to use data as a guide, not a crutch. Some of the most successful campaigns of recent years have managed to do just that, blending data-driven insights with bold, creative ideas.

Take Spotify’s “Wrapped” campaign, which uses personalized data to create highly engaging, shareable content. Or Nike’s “Dream Crazy” ad featuring Colin Kaepernick, which leveraged data to understand its audience but still took a bold stand on a divisive issue. These campaigns show that it’s possible to harness the power of data without sacrificing originality.

The Way Forward

The future of advertising depends on our ability to reclaim creativity from the clutches of algorithms. This means embracing uncertainty, celebrating bold ideas, and recognizing that not everything can—or should—be optimized. It means trusting in the power of human intuition and storytelling, even when the data says otherwise. Because at the end of the day, the ads that truly resonate aren’t the ones that are perfectly optimized; they’re the ones that dare to be different.

Page 3 of 5
1 2 3 4 5