Info

Posts from the all other stuff Category

Choose another category?

In 1928, Edward Bernays argued that shaping public opinion was not only inevitable but essential in a democratic society. His groundbreaking work, Propaganda, laid the foundation for modern public relations, casting persuasion as a neutral tool.

Fast forward to 2019, and Shoshana Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism paints a far darker picture: a world where personal data is weaponized, and human behavior is engineered for profit. Together, their perspectives offer a powerful lens through which to examine today’s Propaganda 2.0—a digital phenomenon that manipulates minds invisibly, blurring the line between persuasion and control.

The Dual Nature of Propaganda

Bernays saw propaganda as a means of organizing public opinion in an increasingly complex world. “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” he wrote. For him, propaganda could rally a nation during wartime, promote public health initiatives, or drive social change.

But even Bernays acknowledged the potential for abuse. Today’s digital propaganda takes his vision to an extreme. Unlike the overt messaging of his era, Propaganda 2.0 operates stealthily. Algorithms track every click, every pause, every scroll, tailoring messages to exploit our emotional triggers. This isn’t just persuasion—it’s manipulation, designed to bypass rational thought and tap directly into our subconscious.

The Surveillance Machine

Here, Zuboff’s critique comes into sharp focus. Surveillance capitalism, as she describes it, turns human experience into raw material for behavioral prediction and modification. The personal data harvested by tech giants fuels micro-targeted ads that don’t just persuade—they shape behavior in real-time, often without the user’s awareness.

Take the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where data from millions of Facebook users was weaponized to influence political outcomes. These “dark ads” exploited psychological vulnerabilities, crafting personalized messages that nudged voters toward specific candidates or policies. The result was a seismic shift in political landscapes, achieved through invisible, unaccountable means.

“This is not just about marketing,” Zuboff warns. “It’s about power—the power to shape human behavior at scale.”

The Ethical Quagmire of Corporate Activism

It’s not just political campaigns leveraging these tactics. Brands, too, have embraced Propaganda 2.0, often under the guise of social responsibility. Following the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020, corporations flooded social media with messages of solidarity. Yet behind closed doors, some of these same companies were funding political actions or policies that contradicted their public stances.

This performative activism raises a critical question: Are brands genuinely committed to the causes they champion, or are they simply exploiting societal issues to build consumer loyalty? Bernays might argue that such campaigns can unify and inspire, but Zuboff would likely see them as another layer of manipulation, reinforcing surveillance capitalism’s grip on society.

The Feedback Loop of Polarization

One of the most insidious effects of Propaganda 2.0 is its role in deepening societal divisions. Algorithms prioritize content that maximizes engagement, which often means amplifying the most emotionally charged and polarizing messages. Over time, this creates echo chambers where individuals are exposed only to information that reinforces their existing beliefs, further entrenching political and cultural divides.

Consider the events surrounding the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In the months leading up to the vote, false narratives about election fraud spread rapidly on social media, fueled by targeted misinformation campaigns. These messages weren’t random—they were designed to sow doubt about the integrity of the election and erode trust in democratic institutions. The result was a deeply divided electorate and, ultimately, the storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Bernays and Zuboff offer complementary solutions to this crisis

Bernays would advocate for professional codes of ethics, urging advertisers and political strategists to use their tools responsibly. He believed in the power of persuasion to educate and unite, provided it was wielded with integrity.

Zuboff, on the other hand, demands systemic reform. She calls for stricter regulations on data collection and use, greater transparency from tech platforms, and robust public education to equip individuals with the critical thinking skills needed to resist manipulation. “We must fight for a future where the digital world serves humanity, not the other way around,” she insists.

The stakes in this fight couldn’t be higher

In an era where information is both ubiquitous and weaponized, the battle for public opinion is a battle for democracy itself. Propaganda 2.0 offers unparalleled power to influence—but with that power comes a profound responsibility. By combining Bernays’ emphasis on ethical persuasion with Zuboff’s call for systemic accountability, we can envision a future where advertising and political messaging inform and inspire without undermining autonomy. The health of our democracy depends on it.

via

via

I had an interesting chat today about whether magic in advertising still remains .

In the golden age of advertising, campaigns weren’t just about selling products—they were about selling ideas, dreams, and emotions. Think of Coca-Cola’s “Hilltop” ad, with its chorus of voices singing about unity and peace, or Apple’s iconic “1984” spot, which heralded the dawn of a new era in personal computing. These weren’t just ads; they were cultural moments, etched into the collective consciousness. They worked because they dared to be different.

But today, the creative spark that once defined advertising seems to be flickering out. In its place, we have an industry increasingly dominated by algorithms and data-driven decision-making. The rise of artificial intelligence and machine learning has brought unprecedented precision to ad targeting and performance measurement. Brands can now tailor their messages to specific audiences with incredible accuracy, optimizing every element of a campaign in real-time. On the surface, it’s a marketer’s dream. But beneath the surface lies a troubling truth: the relentless pursuit of optimization is strangling creativity.

The Algorithmic Trap

At first glance, it’s easy to see the appeal of data-driven advertising. Why take risks when you can use algorithms to predict exactly what will resonate with your audience? Why rely on intuition when machine learning can tell you the perfect color for a call-to-action button or the ideal length of a video ad? The problem is that data only tells us what has worked in the past. And when decisions are made purely based on past performance, the result is often a race to the middle—a homogenized landscape where every ad looks, feels, and sounds the same.

Take the rise of programmatic advertising. By using algorithms to buy and place ads, brands can ensure their messages reach the right people at the right time. But what’s often sacrificed in the process is the human element—the bold, unexpected ideas that grab our attention and linger in our minds. The irony is that while algorithms excel at optimizing for clicks, shares, and conversions, they struggle to account for the intangible qualities that make an ad truly memorable.

The Creativity Crisis

This reliance on data and AI is fostering a culture of risk aversion. In an era where every decision is scrutinized through the lens of performance metrics, there’s little room for experimentation. The result is a flood of safe, formulaic ads designed to maximize short-term gains at the expense of long-term brand building. Creativity thrives on uncertainty, on the willingness to take risks and embrace the possibility of failure. But in a world governed by algorithms, failure is a luxury few are willing to afford.

Consider the case of Super Bowl ads. Once a showcase for daring, innovative storytelling, many of today’s big-game spots feel more like calculated exercises in brand-safe messaging. The stakes are too high, and the data too abundant, for brands to take a chance on something truly groundbreaking. Instead, we get a steady stream of feel-good montages, celebrity cameos, and humor that’s been tested to within an inch of its life.

Finding a Balance

Does this mean data and AI are inherently bad for advertising? Not necessarily. When used thoughtfully, these tools can enhance creativity, providing valuable insights and freeing up time for human ingenuity. The key is to strike a balance—to use data as a guide, not a crutch. Some of the most successful campaigns of recent years have managed to do just that, blending data-driven insights with bold, creative ideas.

Take Spotify’s “Wrapped” campaign, which uses personalized data to create highly engaging, shareable content. Or Nike’s “Dream Crazy” ad featuring Colin Kaepernick, which leveraged data to understand its audience but still took a bold stand on a divisive issue. These campaigns show that it’s possible to harness the power of data without sacrificing originality.

The Way Forward

The future of advertising depends on our ability to reclaim creativity from the clutches of algorithms. This means embracing uncertainty, celebrating bold ideas, and recognizing that not everything can—or should—be optimized. It means trusting in the power of human intuition and storytelling, even when the data says otherwise. Because at the end of the day, the ads that truly resonate aren’t the ones that are perfectly optimized; they’re the ones that dare to be different.

via

now you know

They seem like friends—inviting us into their lives, offering heartfelt advice, and sharing “real” moments. But behind the lens of your favourite influencer lies a billion-dollar machine, quietly shaping your desires, your insecurities, and even your identity. This isn’t just marketing. It’s manipulation. And it’s changing everything.

The Authenticity Scam: Trust for Sale

Authenticity. It’s the currency of the influencer economy. But what happens when that currency is counterfeit? Influencers build empires on relatability, positioning themselves as the voice of the people. Yet, behind the scenes, many are beholden to contracts, scripts, and the relentless pursuit of profit.

That glowing product recommendation? Carefully choreographed. The “spontaneous” life update? Edited and optimized for engagement. The very foundation of influencer marketing rests on a dangerous illusion: that these people are just like you. But they’re not. They’re brands in human form, and their job is to sell—no matter the cost to your trust.

The Silent Crisis: How Influencers Hijack Your Self-Worth

Every scroll through social media is a silent negotiation with your self-esteem. Influencers flaunt picture-perfect lives, effortlessly blending luxury, beauty, and happiness. But these curated realities come at a steep cost.

For many, the impact is devastating. Studies have shown that exposure to influencer content directly correlates with spikes in anxiety, depression, and body dysmorphia. Young audiences, in particular, are left chasing an unattainable standard, sacrificing their mental health on the altar of filtered perfection. And it doesn’t stop there. Influencers don’t just sell products—they sell identities. When you measure your life against their highlight reels, you’re playing a game you can never win.

The Great Commodification: When Identity Becomes a Product

In the influencer economy, everything is for sale—even personal stories. Vulnerability becomes a marketing tactic. Tragedies are repackaged as inspirational content. Joys are monetized.

This isn’t just about influencers themselves—it’s a cultural shift that teaches all of us to view our lives as brands. Authenticity is no longer about being; it’s about performing. And the more we buy into this, the further we drift from genuine connection. In this new world, your worth is measured in likes, shares, and sponsorship deals. Who benefits? Certainly not you.

Blurring the Lines: Advertising in Disguise

Think you can spot an ad? Think again. Sponsored content has become so seamlessly integrated into influencer posts that it’s often impossible to distinguish from genuine recommendations. And while disclosure laws exist, enforcement is laughably inconsistent. The result? You’re constantly consuming ads without even realizing it.

This covert advertising isn’t just unethical—it’s dangerous. When influencers blur the lines between personal endorsement and paid promotion, they erode consumer trust and manipulate your purchasing decisions. It’s a calculated move, designed to make you let your guard down and open your wallet.

The Concentration of Power: When Influence Becomes Dangerous

Influencers don’t just sell products—they shape culture. And as the industry consolidates, a handful of mega-influencers wield immense power over public opinion, trends, and even politics. This isn’t just about who gets to set the latest fashion trend. It’s about who controls the narrative.

With this power comes the potential for abuse. Influencers have the reach to spread misinformation, amplify harmful ideologies, and manipulate their audiences in ways traditional media never could. When influence is concentrated in the hands of a few, democracy itself is at risk.

The Wake-Up Call: Reclaiming Control

It’s time to wake up. The influencer economy thrives on your passivity, counting on you to scroll, like, and buy without question. But you have more power than you think. Start by questioning the content you consume. Who benefits from your engagement? What are they selling—and at what cost to your mental health, your values, and your reality?

Policymakers and platforms must also rise to the challenge. Transparency isn’t optional; it’s essential. Clearer disclosure laws and stricter enforcement are just the beginning. The influencer economy needs guardrails—not just for the sake of consumers, but for the integrity of society itself.

The Future is in Your Hands

The influencer economy isn’t going anywhere. But how it evolves depends on us. We can either let it continue to erode trust, distort reality, and commodify our lives—or we can demand better. Better transparency. Better ethics. Better respect for the power of influence.

So the next time you double-tap a post of your favourite influencer, ask yourself: Am I in control, or am I being controlled? The answer might just change the way you see the world

image via

Page 4 of 3558
1 2 3 4 5 6 … 3,558