Soviet poster warning against the dangers of consumerism (1983). Artwork by B. Rezanov.
Posts from the all other stuff Category
Choose another category?
AI in Politics: When Campaigns Target the Mind, Not the Message
Imagine this: You’re scrolling through your social media feed when an ad catches your eye. It doesn’t just feel relevant—it feels personal. The language, the tone, the imagery—it all resonates in a way that’s almost unsettling. What you don’t realize is that this ad wasn’t crafted for everyone. It was designed for you.
In the past, political campaigns spoke to crowds. Now, they whisper directly into your mind.
Back in 2016, Cambridge Analytica showed us a glimpse of what was possible. By analyzing Facebook likes, they targeted voters with messages tailored to their fears and desires. It was revolutionary—and deeply controversial. But today’s AI has taken that strategy and supercharged it. What was then an experiment in manipulation is now a fully operational playbook for the future of politics.
This isn’t the next chapter in political campaigning. It’s an entirely new book.
The Evolution From Persuasion to Precision Manipulation
Political campaigns used to rely on broad strokes—one message, broadcast to as many people as possible. AI has flipped that strategy on its head. Now, campaigns don’t just speak to you—they adapt to you, learning from your behavior and predicting what will move you most.
Here’s how it works:
- Hyper-Targeted Ads: AI analyzes your online behavior, from your search history to your Instagram likes, building a psychological profile that reveals your deepest motivations. If you’re worried about the economy, you’ll see ads promising financial stability. If you’re passionate about climate change, you’ll get ads highlighting a candidate’s green policies. No two voters see the same campaign.
- Emotionally Engineered Content: AI identifies the emotional triggers most likely to influence your decisions—fear, hope, anger—and crafts messages designed to exploit them. These ads aren’t just persuasive; they’re irresistible.
- Real-Time Adaptation: AI doesn’t just learn from your behavior—it learns from itself. Campaigns can test and refine ads in real time, ensuring that each one is more effective than the last.
The result? Campaigns don’t need to convince you with ideas. They just need to push the right buttons.
Cambridge Analytica Was Just the Beginning
In 2016, Cambridge Analytica scraped data from Facebook to influence elections. They didn’t just advertise—they used psychographic profiling to manipulate voters’ emotions. It was a scandal that rocked the world.
But compared to today’s AI capabilities, Cambridge Analytica looks like a rusty tool. AI doesn’t just scrape your data—it synthesizes it. It doesn’t just profile you—it predicts you. And it doesn’t just create ads—it crafts an experience so personalized, you won’t even realize you’re being influenced.
Imagine this: Two neighbors in the same swing district receive completely different messages from the same campaign. One sees a hopeful ad about unity and progress. The other sees a fearmongering ad about crime and instability. Neither knows the other’s reality. Both think their version is the truth.
This is the future of elections.
When Democracy Becomes Psychological Warfare
AI-driven political advertising isn’t just changing how campaigns operate—it’s changing what we believe. Here’s why it matters:
- Polarization: By feeding voters content tailored to their biases, AI creates echo chambers that deepen divisions. When every voter sees a different version of reality, how can we have a shared understanding of the truth?
- Erosion of Trust: When political campaigns rely on manipulation rather than transparency, voters lose faith—not just in the candidates, but in the democratic process itself.
- Loss of Free Will: At its most extreme, AI doesn’t just influence your decisions—it makes them for you. When algorithms know your thoughts better than you do, are you really in control?
The Dystopian Future of Elections
Picture a future election where AI doesn’t just craft ads—it shapes reality. Political campaigns deploy fleets of AI-generated influencers to flood social media with tailored messages. Bots engage in conversations, posing as real people to sway public opinion. Algorithms decide which news stories you see, steering you toward narratives that align with a candidate’s agenda.
The result? An electorate divided not by ideology, but by manipulated realities. Democracy isn’t just under threat—it’s unrecognizable.
How We Fight Back
Democracy doesn’t just happen. It’s built on trust—trust in our leaders, trust in our institutions, and trust in each other. When campaigns stop appealing to our better angels and start exploiting our fears, we don’t just lose elections. We lose the very essence of democracy itself.
So, how do we fight back?
- Transparency Laws: Campaigns and politicians must disclose when ads are AI-generated and reveal how they target voters. If voters don’t know who or what is behind the message, they can’t make informed decisions.
- Regulating Micro-Targeting: Limit the use of personal data to prevent campaigns from exploiting individual vulnerabilities.
- Digital Literacy: Equip voters with the tools to recognize manipulation and think critically about the content they consume.
But will politicians ever pass such laws?
The rise of AI in politics is inevitable. But its impact is up to us.
We need to ask ourselves: What kind of democracy do we want? One where voters are manipulated by algorithms? Or one where campaigns earn trust by speaking to our values, not our fears?
The next great battle for democracy won’t be fought on the streets or in the courts. It will be fought in the algorithms that shape what we see, what we feel, and what we believe.
Because in a world where persuasion is perfect, the real fight is to protect the imperfect, messy process of democracy.
Image via
Dancing Into Sameness: How TikTok Challenges Are Killing Brand Differentiation
TikTok has been hailed as the great equalizer of modern marketing—a space where brands can reach millions with a single, well-timed post. Its algorithm rewards creativity and engagement, making it a tantalizing platform for brands eager to connect with younger audiences. Yet, new research reveals a troubling truth: much of this content isn’t working.
According to DAIVID, a global creative effectiveness platform, a staggering 84% of branded TikTok videos fail to deliver meaningful emotional engagement or recall. Even more concerning, 24% of these videos evoke intensely negative emotions, such as awkwardness, anxiety, or even disgust. For a platform built on fun and connection, these numbers are a wake-up call.
TikTok’s promise of virality comes with risks, and as more brands jump on the latest dance or hashtag challenge, a deeper issue emerges: When everyone is doing the same thing, what makes you stand out? Are we not supposed to continue building brands on differentiation?
The TikTok Trap: Chasing Trends, Losing Identity
TikTok’s algorithm is a double-edged sword. It rewards content that fits within existing trends, encouraging brands to mimic what’s already working. The result, many brands are producing content that feels interchangeable.
But here’s the problem: TikTok users might engage with these videos, but they don’t always remember the brands behind them. Research shows that TikTok content is 9% less likely to generate intense positive emotions and garners 2.5% less attention than global averages. This isn’t just a numbers game—it’s a question of relevance.
When every coffee shop, sneaker company, and clothing brand participates in the same viral dance, their messages blur together.
TikTok might boost short-term engagement, but does it build long-term loyalty, does it get your message across?
The Danger of Sameness
The biggest issue with TikTok marketing isn’t its creativity—it’s its conformity. The pressure to stay relevant on the platform often leads to a flood of repetitive, low-risk, low-value content.
According to Influencer Marketing Hub’s 2024 TikTok Marketing Report, user-generated content (55.7%) outperforms branded challenges (13.1%) in effectiveness. This suggests that audiences value authenticity over slickly produced, trend-chasing videos.
Even worse, DAIVID’s data highlights that 24% of TikTok videos evoke negative emotions, undermining brand trust. Whether it’s a poorly executed challenge or a tone-deaf campaign, these missteps have consequences. Consumers aren’t just disengaging—they’re forming negative associations with the brands involved.
Breaking Free From the Algorithm
The good news? Brands don’t have to play by TikTok’s rules to succeed on the platform. Instead of chasing trends, they can focus on creating content that reflects their unique voice and values.
- Lean Into Authenticity:
TikTok thrives on genuine, relatable content. Instead of mimicking trends, brands can spotlight real stories, user-generated content, or behind-the-scenes glimpses. - Embrace Feedback:
According to the TikTok Marketing Report, 67.8% https://influencermarketinghub.com/tiktok-marketing-report/of marketers consider community feedback critical to their content strategies. Listening to what audiences want—and adapting accordingly—can set brands apart. - Be Bold and Purposeful:
Trends may drive views, but purpose builds loyalty. Brands that align their content with their mission and values will foster deeper connections.
The Opportunity Ahead
TikTok isn’t the problem—it’s how brands use it. The platform offers unparalleled reach and creativity, but only if brands resist the urge to conform. Instead of chasing fleeting trends, the most successful brands will innovate, crafting campaigns that are memorable and meaningful.
Great brands don’t just follow the crowd. They lead with purpose, the differentiate.
In a world of constant content, the challenge isn’t going viral—it’s being remembered.
The path forward is clear, and if the influencer marketing landscape has taught us anything, it’s that authenticity always wins in the long run.
So, the next time your marketing team proposes a TikTok dance or a challenge, ask: “Does this reflect who we are—or just what’s trending?”
In a world where attention spans are short and sameness is everywhere, the boldest move a brand can make is to be itself.
Takeaways from the Data
- 84% of TikTok videos underperform in emotional engagement and brand recall.
- 24% of TikTok videos evoke negative emotions, harming brand trust.
- User-generated content (55.7%) outshines branded challenges (13.1%) in effectiveness.
- Community feedback (67.8%) is critical for shaping successful campaigns.
The Rise of the AI Influencer: When Humans Are No Longer Needed
Meet Lil Miquela. She’s a 19-year-old Brazilian-American model with over 2,5 million Instagram followers. She wears the latest streetwear, collaborates with top fashion brands like Prada and Calvin Klein, and engages her fans with heartfelt captions about social justice. But here’s the catch: Lil Miquela isn’t real. She’s a computer-generated character brought to life by a Los Angeles-based company called Brud.
And she’s not alone. Shudu, often dubbed the world’s first digital supermodel, graces magazine covers and partners with luxury brands like Balmain. Imma, a pink-haired Japanese virtual influencer, is a staple in the fashion and tech industries. These AI influencers don’t just exist—they thrive, raking in millions and reshaping the influencer marketing landscape.
This raises a question we can’t afford to ignore: When influencers are no longer human, what happens to authenticity, creativity, and trust?
The AI Advantage: Flawless and Forever
AI influencers like Lil Miquela have distinct advantages over their human counterparts. They don’t age, they don’t get tired, they never go off-brand and they never sound like idiots. They’re meticulously designed to be relatable yet aspirational, operating 24/7 to engage their audiences without ever slipping up.
For brands, this is a dream come true. AI influencers offer complete creative control. They can be programmed to align perfectly with a campaign’s values, adjust their appearance for different demographics, and respond to trends at lightning speed.
Consider this: According to Statista the global influencer marketing market size has more than tripled since 2019. In 2024, the market was estimated to reach a record of 24 billion US dollars.
With AI influencers offering cost efficiency and reliability, their slice of this pie is growing exponentially.
But what happens when perfection becomes the norm? Are we trading human connection for digital consistency?
One of the most polarizing aspects of AI influencers is the question of transparency.
When you double-tap on a post by Shudu, do you know you’re engaging with a digital creation? Many followers of these AI influencers believe they’re interacting with real people—an illusion that companies are often happy to maintain.
This blurring of lines raises ethical concerns. Should brands be required to disclose when an influencer isn’t human? Are these digital personas stealing opportunities from real creators, especially as companies allocate their budgets toward AI campaigns?
In 2023, Calvin Klein faced backlash for featuring Lil Miquela in a campaign where she shared a kiss with supermodel Bella Hadid.
Critics argued that the campaign commodified identity and blurred the lines of authenticity in an exploitative way. Calvin Klein later apologized, but the controversy sparked a broader debate: Is it ethical to present AI influencers as equals—or even replacements—for human voices?
The Emotional Disconnect: Can We Trust What Isn’t Real?
Authenticity has long been the cornerstone of influencer marketing. Followers gravitate toward influencers who share their struggles, joys, and imperfections. But what happens when those imperfections are replaced with algorithmic precision?
Fans of Imma, the Japanese virtual influencer, might marvel at her perfectly curated feed. Yet, can someone who’s never experienced joy, heartbreak, or growth truly connect on a human level? And if they can’t, are they still influencers—or are they just marketing tools?
The rise of AI influencers isn’t just a technological trend—it’s a societal shift.
We’re moving into a world where human experience is being outsourced to machines. For brands, this offers unparalleled creative possibilities. For society, it raises profound questions about what we value in our interactions and connections.
The influencer economy was built on relatability, the idea that someone like you could rise to fame by being authentic and accessible. But as AI influencers dominate, we must ask: Are we ready to embrace a future where the most influential voices in our culture aren’t even human?
This isn’t a rally against AI influencers.
Technology has always pushed us forward, challenging our ideas of what’s possible. But as we move deeper into this digital frontier, we must demand transparency, ethics, and a commitment to preserving what makes us human.
The question isn’t whether AI can influence us—it already does. The question is, how do we ensure that as technology advances, it serves our humanity, not replaces it?
So, the next time you scroll through your feed and see a flawless smile staring back at you, ask yourself: Who—or what—is behind it? And more importantly, what does that say about the world we’re building? Stay Curious!
Advertising to AI: The New Target Audience
When Algorithms Make Decisions, What Happens to Us?
It starts with a soft chime, just loud enough to catch your attention. You glance at your phone, and there it is: a notification that your groceries are on the way. You didn’t make a list, let alone place an order. Your AI assistant handled everything. It analyzed your pantry, cross-referenced your previous orders, and negotiated the best deals with your preferred stores.
At first, you’re impressed. After all, this is convenience at its finest. But as you unpack the bags later that evening, something feels… off. The coffee is a different brand. The cereal, too. Even the toothpaste isn’t quite right. It’s not what you would’ve chosen.
That’s when it hits you. The assistant didn’t shop for you—it shopped for itself, following priorities set not by your tastes, but by the brands that learned how to win its favor.
This is the new frontier of advertising, where the audience isn’t you anymore. It’s the algorithm. And in this quiet, almost imperceptible shift, the very nature of choice is being rewritten.
A World of Gatekeepers
Advertising, at its core, has always been about connection. It’s the art of understanding people—their desires, fears, and dreams—and crafting stories that speak to them.
For decades, brands poured their energy into winning hearts and minds. A jingle on the radio. A clever slogan on a billboard. A touching ad during the Super Bowl. It was a dance between creativity and emotion, all designed to resonate with you.
But now, the gatekeepers are changing. Instead of speaking directly to people, brands are starting to learn how to appeal to the machines that make decisions for us. Smart assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Home are no longer passive tools; they’re active participants, deciding what products we see, what services we choose, and how we spend our money.
This isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a profound transformation of the relationship between consumers, companies, and the algorithms that now stand between them.
The Algorithm Decides
Imagine standing in a grocery store aisle, weighing two options: one cereal is a little cheaper, the other a little healthier. You consider the pros and cons, think about your budget, maybe even remember a jingle from an old commercial. Then you make your choice.
Now imagine that choice is made before you ever step foot in the store. Your smart assistant has already placed the order, choosing the cereal that best aligns with its programmed priorities. Maybe it picked the one with a higher profit margin for the platform. Maybe the brand struck a deal to get on the assistant’s “preferred list.”
You didn’t choose. The algorithm did. And the algorithm didn’t choose for you—it chose based on what served its interests.
This isn’t the future. It’s happening now. AI assistants are already shaping purchasing decisions in subtle but powerful ways. They suggest products, reorder supplies, and guide our choices, often without us realizing it. See what Netflix and Spotify do with their AI suggestions.
And for the brands competing in this new arena, the game is changing. Instead of designing ads to capture your attention, they’re designing strategies to influence the algorithms that hold it.
The Cost of Convenience
There’s no denying the appeal of this AI-driven world. It’s efficient, seamless, and tailored to your needs—or so it seems.
But here’s the question we need to ask: what do we lose in this trade-off?
When machines take over the act of choosing, we lose a little bit of agency. We become passengers in a process that was once deeply personal. Decisions that used to involve thought, reflection, and even a touch of joy are reduced to transactions carried out by systems we barely understand.
And it doesn’t stop there. Smaller brands—those without the resources to compete in this algorithmic marketplace—risk being shut out entirely. Innovation suffers when only the biggest players can afford to play.
Most importantly, we lose transparency. How do we know these systems are working in our best interest? Without oversight, it’s impossible to tell whether your assistant is prioritizing your needs or its own bottom line.
A Future Worth Shaping
This moment asks us to confront some hard truths. The machines we’ve built to simplify our lives are becoming decision-makers in ways we didn’t anticipate. And if we’re not careful, we risk losing control of the very systems we created.
But it doesn’t have to be this way. Technology is a tool, not a destiny. With the right choices, we can ensure these systems serve us, not the other way around.
It starts with demanding transparency—from the companies that build these algorithms, from the brands that work with them, and from the policymakers who regulate them. It requires vigilance from all of us to ensure that as technology grows smarter, it also grows fairer.
Most of all, it requires us to stay engaged. To ask questions. To insist on systems that reflect our values, our humanity, and our shared commitment to fairness and choice.
The Responsibility of Progress
Progress isn’t just about what we can build—it’s about who we want to be. It’s not enough to marvel at the efficiency of these systems. We have to ensure they respect our dignity, protect our choices, and serve the greater good.
The rise of AI advertising isn’t just a technological shift. It’s a test of our values. And as we navigate this new world, let’s remember: the best technology doesn’t replace humans It enhances them. This is our moment to shape the future. Let’s make it one we can be proud of.
image via
The End of Individual Branding: What Happens When We All Sell Ourselves?
If Everyone’s a Brand, Is Anyone Truly Themselves?
Welcome to the Age of the Brand-ividual
Scroll through Instagram. What do you see? Polished vacation shots. Carefully worded captions. Vulnerability dressed up for maximum engagement. Every friend has become a lifestyle influencer, every coworker a thought leader, every teenager a TikTok creator hustling for virality.
We’ve reached a point where living authentically feels like a revolutionary act. In this world, you’re not just you—you’re a brand.
What happens when every moment is curated, every thought is monetized, and every person becomes their own product? Who are we when the lights go off, and the algorithm stops caring?
This is the age of the brand-ividual—a world where personal branding isn’t just a tool; it’s a survival strategy. And while it promises visibility, control, and opportunity, it comes with a cost we haven’t fully reckoned with.
The Rise of the Brand-ividual
Personal branding wasn’t born with social media, but platforms like Instagram, LinkedIn, and TikTok turned it into a global obsession. At first, it felt empowering. No longer confined to corporate gatekeepers, anyone could broadcast their ideas, showcase their talents, and create their own success.
But somewhere along the way, the lines blurred. The professional became personal. The personal became performative. Suddenly, everyone—from high school students to CEOs—felt the need to market themselves, whether they wanted to or not.
Today, it’s not enough to just live your life. You have to package it, post it, and promote it. Every meal is a potential story. Every sunset, a potential Reel. Every moment, a chance to sell yourself.
The Toll of Living for the Algorithm
The problem is, branding isn’t being. The more we curate, the more disconnected we become—not just from others but from ourselves.
- Burnout in the Age of Performance:
The influencer who never logs off, the employee constantly “networking” online, the teenager chasing likes at the expense of their mental health. Studies show that the constant need to maintain an online persona is linked to anxiety, depression, and burnout.A 2023 survey found that 73% of Gen Zers feel pressure to present a perfect version of themselves online, even though it doesn’t reflect their reality. - The Loss of Authentic Connection:
When everyone’s a brand, every interaction becomes a transaction. Friends become followers. Conversations become opportunities to grow your audience. The result? A loneliness epidemic in a world that’s more connected than ever.We’ve traded intimacy for influence, and in doing so, we’ve forgotten the value of simply being.”
When Branding Eclipses Being
The societal implications are staggering.
- Self-Worth Tied to Metrics:
In a world where likes, comments, and shares determine value, self-esteem becomes dangerously tied to external validation. The fear of irrelevance drives people to post more, share more, and curate more, creating a cycle that’s hard to escape. - Performing Vulnerability:
Even the rawest moments—grief, struggle, triumph—are edited and captioned for engagement. When everything is content, nothing feels real. - The Erasure of Complexity:
Branding requires simplicity: a clear message, a consistent image. But people are messy, contradictory, and complex. What happens when we flatten ourselves into a version the world will “like”?
Is There Another Way?
It doesn’t have to be this way. Personal branding isn’t inherently bad—it’s how we use it that matters. The key is reclaiming control, setting boundaries, and remembering that who we are is not the same as what we post.
The challenge isn’t to stop sharing our stories. It’s to share them on our terms. To resist the pressure to perform, and instead, choose to be present. To remember that our worth isn’t in our brand—but in our humanity.
Imagine a world where social media isn’t a stage but a space—where people share their lives, not their personas
Where vulnerability isn’t measured in likes, and the connection isn’t filtered through an algorithm.
The future isn’t about selling yourself—it’s about finding yourself. Because the world doesn’t need more brands. It requires more people willing to show up, unpolished and unfiltered, just as they are. Because if everyone’s a brand, we risk losing the most important thing we have: ourselves.
Woke Marketing and the Risk of Alienating Core Customers
When Progressive Messaging Meets Backlash: Can Brand Balance Evolution and Loyalty?
A High-Stakes Gamble
Imagine this: A beer company partners with a transgender influencer, hoping to celebrate inclusivity and attract younger audiences. But instead of sparking celebration, the campaign triggers boycotts, viral memes, and millions in lost sales.
Or consider a luxury car brand with a legacy of speed and power suddenly rebranding itself as an electric vehicle icon, dropping its classic logo in favor of a sleeker, modern image. Progress? Sure. But for some longtime fans, it felt like a betrayal of everything the brand once stood for.
As you already know, these aren’t hypothetical scenarios—they’re the reality of woke marketing. It’s a strategy as risky as it is bold, where brands take stances on cultural issues to connect with new audiences, knowing full well they might alienate the ones who got them here
When brands take a stand, are they leading us toward progress, or are they leaving their roots—and their customers—behind?
When Woke Meets Backlash
- Bud Light: Bridging Inclusivity and Boycotts
In April 2023, Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney for a campaign meant to highlight inclusivity. But the move clashed with the brand’s blue-collar identity, sparking backlash from conservative groups and boycotts that made headlines.Within weeks, sales plummeted, leaving the brand scrambling to rebuild trust. It’s a cautionary tale: Progress without alignment can feel like pandering, leaving brands caught in the crossfire. - Jaguar: Evolution or Identity Crisis?
Jaguar, once synonymous with power and luxury, rebranded itself as a sustainable electric vehicle company in late 2024. The sleek campaign features a modernized logo, omitting the iconic “leaper” and embracing vibrant visuals meant to appeal to younger, eco-conscious woke consumers. But for many Jaguar enthusiasts, the shift felt like the brand was erasing its heritage (Jaguar’s main audience is rich white men). Critics are accusing Jaguar of abandoning its iconic identity, questioning whether the move was more about chasing trends than embracing true innovation. - Gillette: Redefining Masculinity
Gillette’s “The Best Men Can Be” campaign tackled toxic masculinity head-on, encouraging men to hold themselves accountable. Some praised it as bold and necessary. Others felt targeted, arguing that the ad vilified its core audience. The resulting boycotts were a reminder that even the best intentions can divide as much as they inspire.
Why Woke Marketing Often Misses the Mark
Woke marketing isn’t inherently flawed—but its execution often is. Campaigns falter when they overlook these key principles:
- Authenticity Matters:
A beer brand with a traditional image can’t pivot to progressive ideals overnight without alienating its base. Jaguar’s transformation felt abrupt, leaving its core audience questioning the brand’s identity. - Understand the Audience:
Progressive messaging may resonate with younger demographics but can alienate more traditional consumers. The challenge is finding a way to connect with both without alienating either. - The Perception of Opportunism:
When a campaign feels like a one-off gesture rather than a genuine reflection of a brand’s values, it risks being dismissed as performative. Consumers aren’t just buying products—they’re buying trust.
Can Brands Bridge the Divide?
Gender fluidity, inclusivity, and sustainability aren’t just trends but reflections of a changing world. And while some brands, like Gucci, thrive on pushing boundaries, others face an uphill battle when stepping into these conversations.
When brands address identity and culture, they’re not just shaping their image—they’re shaping our shared story. And that story has to be built on more than a tagline. It has to be built on truth.
The key is finding balance. Bud Light’s misstep wasn’t in embracing inclusivity—it was in doing so without fully considering its audience. Jaguar’s pivot toward sustainability wasn’t wrong—how quickly it abandoned its legacy and target audience created resistance.
A Path Forward for Conscious Marketing
Woke marketing isn’t about choosing sides. It’s about finding a way to connect across divides. To succeed, brands must:
- Lead with authenticity, ensuring their actions match their messaging.
- Understand their audience, balancing tradition with evolution.
- Focus on human stories that foster empathy, rather than shock value.
It’s not about whether you take a stand—it’s about how you stand. Are you bridging divides, or widening them? Are you leading with purpose, or chasing trends?
Imagine a world where brands take bold stances without losing their roots.
The power of a brand isn’t just in what it sells. It’s in what it stands for. And the brands that lead with courage, authenticity, and purpose will be the ones shaping a better, more connected world.
Because in the end, woke marketing isn’t just about making headlines. It’s about making a difference.